about leaks ... luckily the SORTIR DU NUCLEAIRE network requested an audit of the site following the "declared" leaks, eh Christophe?
otherwise who else would have asked him? the ASN?
I ask: who to trust?
http://www.greenpeace.fr/stop-plutonium ... anium.php3
The treatment of depleted uranium
Before enrichment, uranium (imported at 100% today) undergoes various transformations. The main ones are:
- conversion at the Comurhex plant near Narbonne of uranium (yellow cake) paste into uranium tetrafluoride (UF4),
- then at the Comurhex plant in Pierrelatte the conversion of UF4 to UF6, the form in which the uranium is enriched at the Eurodif plant in Pierrelatte.
The depleted uranium thus comes out of enrichment in UF6 form. This form is particularly unstable.
"Comurhex Pierrelatte specializes in transforming the uranium necessary for the operation of the nuclear fleet. The site produces uranium hexafluoride, essential for enrichment processes."
hexafluoride ...
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hexafluorure_d'uraniumit is therefore enrichment of uranium, which produces depleted uranium as dirt, BUT NOT THAT!
so when we say nuclear, we must know that the entire industry related to the preparation of fuel, pollutes the environment.
Another remark: France is dependent on 100% of imported uranium, energy independence was just a pretext ...
what info?
According to Wise-Paris ** in 2001 2 165 Eurodif has produced tons of enriched UF6 from 18 194 tonnes of natural UF6 provided by Comhurex Pierrelatte. According to the documentation AREVA production 1 kg of enriched uranium from 8 kg of natural uranium corresponds to UTS 5 and 900 MW reactor consumes 100 000 SWU annually.
little reminder of radioactive 2008 summer:
7 JULY
Large leak of uranium (75 kg) in two rivers adjacent to the nuclear site following an overflow of a tank in the enclosure of the Socatri plant, on the site of Tricastin.
17 JULY
A leak is detected on a defective pipeline carrying radioactive effluents and uranium to the Franco-Belgian fuel fabrication (FBFC) in Romans-sur-Isère.
23 JULY
About a hundred people were "slightly contaminated" during an intervention on reactor n ° 4 of the EDF-Tricastin nuclear power plant.
6 AUGUST
An anomaly when opening a package on the Socatri plant results in radioactive releases into the atmosphere.
little game: know how to answer these questions:
- what happens to the waste of enrichment, where are they supposed to go? The public meetings having been organized in the communes located around the nuclear site of Tricastin, the contradictory debate was not accessible to the inhabitants of Limousin. This deficiency of the file will have gone unnoticed while 7 kg of DU are produced per kg of enriched uranium!
- Where to store depleted uranium? On the spot ? On some mining site owned by COGEMA?
- Where will the fluorite barrels from the defluorination of the depleted U, containing uranium, go? On which public dump?
and many others ...
we now see that as soon as there is a release into the environment, the lobby speaks of "kilogram of uranium" as equivalent, a bit like "ton of carbon" to talk about CO2 ... but in fact behind all that there are many other compounds, + or - detectable, and much more horrible ... the tricastin leak would therefore be, according to its detractors, "uranium effluents" comprising "kilograms of uranium", but that would be good from fluorite to uranium .... beuark
http://www.wise-paris.org/index_f.html? ... ndeau.html
plutonium (Pluto, God of hell) did not exist on earth, it was created by EDF ...