They should not normally be active activists of the "anti" movement!
... Already they are not very active anyway!
All kidding aside, contrary to what some write in their contribution to the public inquiry (whether for or against), the question is not about the "expansion" of the airfield or its existence, but formally on a particular PSA project and, basically, if we do not want that one, what type of PSA should apply to it. This does not call into question the presence of this staff as it operates to date, even if its need has not been demonstrated ...
It is obviously on the question of the possible elimination of the two forest borders that the tensions are focused, the other more technical problems are difficult to grasp, but this is not the subject of this consultation either.