To Remundo's reflections, I would eventually listen to these:
bpval wrote:Solar thermal power plants consume appreciable quantities of fresh water, a rare commodity in arid zones
What alternatives there? Very poor regions, without development of available resources. Result: poverty which is the crucible of all fanaticism.
And this argument does not hold. The abundance of energy will make it possible to desalinate sea water, make deserts bloom again, develop agriculture there, develop non-polluting transport (electric train) ... etc. The water will come back over time the more vegetation will develop, creating micro-climates ... This offers fantastic prospects for the riparian countries and the new prosperity, a political stabilization.
bpval wrote:Thermal storage involves the use of huge quantities of molten salts (nitrates, etc.) from heavy chemicals. In France, these installations are classified as SEVESO.
The main problem is not that one but the instability of electrons and provocation of electrolysis ... from what I understood. Electrolysis can in turn be "controlled" to store hydrogen ... clean energy as well. So there is no problem.
bpval wrote:DESERTEC involves a very centralized mode of energy production.
At all, localized to ... very localized:
Research project at
Font-Romeu-Odeillo, France. To illustrate Ramundo's words, here is the Stirling engine, of which he speaks, which is placed at the center of the parable. (Source: Wiki)
bpval wrote:The African Union rejects this project because it leads to the division in two of Africa and is perceived as a new neo-colonialist initiative.
Uh .. wait, the current President of the Union Afric @ ine, it would not be the nice sympathetic Mu @ mmar K @ dd @ fi?
You see, the alternative to all this is atomic energy ... what do you choose?