Stanley Kubrik went to the moon?

[Christophe]

— it's just me, or since there have been several foreign observation missions (other than the USA), and I don't remember that any of them saw fit to confirm it (or invalidate it) to raise doubt, or post high-resolution photos of the alleged moon landing sites.

I had asked myself the question a few years ago and NASA had released some pixelated or blurry images...

Nothing really conclusive, it's crazy! But you can still see the traces:

Apollo-14.jpg (41.83 KiB) Viewed 3885 times

Apollo-12.jpg (36.07 KiB) Viewed 3885 times

It's moon!! Uh that sucks!

https://www.google.com/search?q=nasa+si ... e&tbm=isch

[Obamot]

LoL does that mean that Kubrick had even thought about the aerial shots?

Ah but I'm stupid, there's no air on the Nule (the more stupid it is, the more they make you laugh)

[phil59]

Go to the moon, yes it really is.

That there were fakes, yes, arrangements, fake films yes.

But it's really done, we made additional arrangements.

I have a trip not in VT to go to Spain. (1100-1150km)

Yes, there are possibilities.

Problems of the unexpected, there's some.

But, having a dwarf, black, and ugly, in a mission, will be more complicated.

Very quirky humor.

[Christophe]

Finally a beautiful image of the Lunar Eagles:

The remains of the Apollo missions taken from India (conspiracy accomplice)

Chandrayaan 2, India's lunar-orbiting probe, sent us these two images, the Apollo 11 and 12 landing sites. These are images with higher resolution than NASA's LRO, and show incredible detail .

The difference in length of the shadows cast on the ground is due to the different shooting times and also to the positions of the modules. The Indian space agency ISRO is completely independent, so I am eagerly awaiting the explanations of the "non-experts" on these images.

What power plays were made to convince ISRO to document a (false?) NASA historical fact?

Image processing: Giuseppe Donatiello

Credit: ISRO - bfcspace / text Livio Bordignon

apollo.jpg (90.72 KiB) Viewed 3526 times

[Obamot]

The first to invalidate the theory that "the USA would not have been on the Moon physically during their mission", would have been the USSR (which was very well informed and with all the necessary means of detection) but they did not.

The latter would have been the scientists who examined the moon rock samples, but they didn't either...

I say this with extreme caution ( )

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

The first to invalidate the theory that "the USA would not have been on the Moon physically during their mission", would have been the USSR (which was very well informed and with all the necessary means of detection) but they did not.

As they could have razed kyiv but they didn't.... When you still have nothing to say, you SHUT UP.

[Ahmed]

...new application of his recent fad, the "random quibble"...

[Janic]

When we still have nothing to say, we SHUT UP.

and yet the guyzimenteur continues to open his; like what they are the shoemakers with the worst shoes.

[Exnihiloest]

When we still have nothing to say, we SHUT UP.

and yet the guyzimenteur continues to open his; like what they are the shoemakers with the worst shoes.

Summary: "cuiquiquiditquiil'est"
We can leave for weeks, and when we come back we find the same crass stupidity at the janicon. It is so thick that you can't see anything else.

[Janic]

simpleton

Summary: "cuiquiquiditquiil'est"

what sagacity, incredible!

We can leave for weeks, and when we come back we find the same crass stupidity at the janicon. It is so thick that you can't see anything else.

anyway the simple mole never sees anything, that's stupid!
Summary: "cuiquiquiditquiil'est"