izentrop wrote: For some years now there has been an interesting dialogue between scientists and meditators, whether you like it or not. There are more urgent and serious fields than that.
This kind of circular reasoning leads to nothing.
It is more important to deal with hunger in the world than whales, so why take care of hunger in the world when we should be dealing with our homeless, and before dealing with his last ones it would be better to take care of the citizens who work and who have difficulties at the end of the month ... in short, there is always more urgent and nothing must be done!
Regarding the serious I think you have not studied the subject, it is obvious!
It must be understood that the ecological problem is not a technical problem, nor a financial problem, but exclusively a psychic problem.
It is by understanding the functioning of our brain and the determinisms that drive it that we will be able to respond correctly to the future dangers that presents itself to us.