Good evening
We can do 2 reflections:
1: ho, clumsy, they do not know how to do it, but it's easy to solder 3 tube ends
2: the poor, here are two who have been scammed, but hey, they probably did not lose everything, we go to school to learn, do not they? And as said Andrew, it is often with failure that we advance
It is true that if their system had worked, the journalists would certainly have had another speech.
Have these young people been to "bad school"?
In the bibliography of their report, they cite, inter alia:
www.quanthomme.free.fr
www.econologie.com
But hey, they did not do everything themselves: it is a derivative of the spad, improved by its designer, the bubbler apart, is warmed by the engine cooling system
In fact, they bought the bubbler and the reactors and put these elements themselves on the tractor, if you want to see an example, there are some in this press review, or then look on the website chtipantone.org (c he is the one who provided the elements), the bubbler, he does it himself, all stainless steel, neat finish, welded to the Tig without doubt (on this side there is nothing wrong)
700 bubbler €; 3 reactors: 300 €
On the other hand, the reactors buy them from SPAD
If it must do the assembly, it asks about 2200 € (see number of reactor mounted)
As for the experimentation on the M160, when they saw that it did not work, he called the designer, he said to try that with 2 reactors, that 3 was probably too much (they had provided valves to cut one or two reactors)
The following you know her
It would be better to try a system that works in advance, the winemaker Fendt you know, Lau, who reached the 60% savings for the same job, could not you arrange to have it tested?
bolt