Dédéleco or rather Drake Landing Solar rewarded!

Books, television programs, films, magazines or music to share, counselor to discover ... Talk to news affecting in any way the econology, environment, energy, society, consumption (new laws or standards) ...
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

by Obamot » 28/11/11, 23:51

MDR collapsed on the ground, Dededlco, still ...

No Christophe: dedé does not advertise, it's a populist econologist (Which would be better to sweep in front of his door before saying zaneries!)

The number of enormities that it delivers to the second is surprising, look rather:

Swiss... : Mrgreen: (which ones?)
that's like the shepherds-german, neither really shepherds nor really german what, in short it was to laugh a shot ...) : Mrgreen:

... in any case, according to Dedelco who generalizes, they:
- build passive houses with a strict standard guaranteeing that a heating other than the one using solar thermal ... and that, that would encourage French nuclear!
- decide, to everyone's surprise, not only to get out of the nuclear, but offer all the legislative panoply to do this ... and that, that would encourage French nuclear!

[ : Mrgreen: ]

We do not have the same regulations or the same ostrich energy policy as our big neighbor, and we do not really see how decisions made by the Swiss in Bern could have any impact. on the politics of Paris, who prefers to be proud of being the nuclear garbage of Europe (see the new storage sites at Bugey, etc ...), while singing the Marseilles feet in the plutonium. beware! Yes, but the Swiss have nothing to do with it, swear! : Mrgreen: : Cheesy:
0 x
dedeleco
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9211
Registration: 16/01/10, 01:19
x 10

by dedeleco » 29/11/11, 10:08

The Swiss, by not looking for a renewable cheaper than the nuclear, and usable on the old houses difficult to isolate perfectly in France, and considering the prices of what they recommend in Switzerland, stored in a huge balloon not original at all , a cumulus well magnified, unusable on all the old houses of France, even in the course of completion, in fact, they encourage the continuation of the nuclear in France cheap, in false appearance, which fights the CO2, until the next Fukushima -Chernobyl in France, inevitable, sooner or later, since the French supermen of nuclear can not be infallible in perpetuity !!

And unfortunately all Europe will be contaminated, much more than in Chernobyl ::

So, find renewable cheaper than nuclear and try to realize it to find and develop, instead of repeating that it's impossible, even if www.dlsc.ca proves that it is possible since 2007, with in addition a price reward !!
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

by Obamot » 29/11/11, 11:25

dedeleco wrote:The Swiss, by not looking for a renewable cheaper than the nuclear,


And first of all, what do you know about it? You want to talk "the French", that's it ... You'd like us to go into generalities to do as pb and confront each other, but you know you're a great clever! Because we, the nuclear, had the courage to give it up! So sweep in front of your door ...

dedeleco wrote:and usable on old houses difficult to isolate perfectly in France,


Yes, except that with the French government policy, which encourages heating with electricity, it is your country that encourages nuclear power. In Switzerland, the new directives PROHIBIT to heat with electricity. Electric heaters are being banned for sale (it is now in months) and owners who have opted for electricity (they are rare here) will have to review their heating system.

When are such drastic measures in France? At the next Cherno-Parisian?

dedeleco wrote:and considering the prices of what they recommend in Switzerland,


With the colossal indebtedness of France (which has little to envy to that of Greece if we withdraw interest late ...) you can talk about "the prices recommended in Switzerland", it will make you laugh (yellow) more a ...


dedeleco wrote:stored in a huge balloon not original at all, a cumulus well magnified,


Well, here's the thermal solar is not "Original at all"This is what made all the vegetation grow on land and allowed the building of oil reserves. You really wallow in the nonsense there ...

dedeleco wrote:unusable on all the old houses of France


Who built these houses? The Swiss or Portuguese you have always underpaid on construction sites? That's why you want to use a solution even less efficient for your shack .... we wish you good luck!

dedeleco wrote:they encourage the continuation of nuclear power in France cheap,


"they"? Which? Too bad you arrive too late, we already voted the exit of the nuclear, and you?

dedeleco wrote:in false appearance, who fights the CO2, until the next Fukushima-Chernobyl in France, inevitable, sooner or later, since the French supermen of the nuclear can not be infallible in perpetuity !!


What are you waiting for? Go down the street? Join Contratom!

dedeleco wrote:And unfortunately all Europe will be contaminated, much more than Chernobyl


And then, France is a sovereign country, it will pay compensation to its neighbors, it will be so over-indebted that it will be ruined for thousands of years ... And you remain idle to promote technologies unsuitable in many cases ...? By reasoning with the back of the spoon, or could also accuse you of "Continue to be partially responsible for nuclear power in France".

By the way, being French ... do you heat yourself with NUCLEAR electricity I presume?

dedeleco wrote:So, find renewable cheaper than nuclear and try to realize it to find and develop, instead of repeating that it is impossible, even if xxxxx proves that it is possible since 2007, with in addition a price reward !!


First, for the intant, they have not proved anything, except that they made a good marketing move .... Then we do not need Drake Queen thing, who would not work at home (no more than in Canada at ZERO EMISSIONS) simply because we aim for zero pollution.

The REAL constructions ZERO EMISSION - ZERO HEATING INVOICE, are here:
https://www.econologie.com/forums/chauffage- ... 11285.html

And they are not "in the state of project"!

And since you're so smart, show us the example! : Mrgreen:
0 x
dedeleco
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9211
Registration: 16/01/10, 01:19
x 10

by dedeleco » 29/11/11, 12:34

Nuclear explosion without radiation from Obamat !!

More
Drake Queen

www.dlsc.ca can very easily become zero emissions with a few more sensors for the ECS or taking showers 20 ° C !!

And it is essential to achieve the cheapest possible summer storage for winter, cheaper than nuclear and oil or gas, for old houses, which technically is possible, instead of seeing only the Swiss balloon solution that fails to store summer for the winter in fact, without the winter sun.
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

by Obamot » 29/11/11, 14:22

dedeleco wrote:www.dlsc.ca can very easily become zero emissions with a little more sanitary sensors for DHW or taking showers at 20 ° C!


So what! Have not you asked yourself why they did not do it right away?

dedeleco wrote:And it is essential to achieve the cheapest possible summer storage for winter, cheaper than nuclear and oil or gas, for old houses, which technically is possible, instead of seeing only the Swiss balloon solution that fails to store summer for the winter of fact, without the winter sun


I have nothing against ... But Canadians also need the winter sun, and I would even say: ESPECIALLY THEM! Because with them, the overflow on the "middle season", looooooooong time ....

So stop being biased stp
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79304
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11037

by Christophe » 29/11/11, 14:35

I propose a temporary lock to calm the spirits ... :?:
0 x
User avatar
Napo dwarf
I understand econologic
I understand econologic
posts: 180
Registration: 04/03/10, 10:43
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow

by Napo dwarf » 29/11/11, 15:28

I vote for ^^

the problem of both is that they are narrow

dedeleco because he is too enthusiastic
obamot because he does not want to understand that installation is not suitable for renovation
0 x
Of all those who have nothing to say, the nicest are those who are silent
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79304
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11037

by Christophe » 29/11/11, 15:33

If it could be: by making an annex at home ... of course it must be possible ...

Many things are unfortunately not feasible in renovation ...

Soon, with the explosion of the price of energy, many old battisses impossible to optimize energy and to heat at a reasonable price will lose a large part of their value ...

Remind me (Obamot or dedeleco by MP?) To unlock the subject in a while ... in case I forget to do it ...
0 x

Back to "Media & News: TV shows, reports, books, news ..."

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : Macro and 175 guests