Napo dwarf wrote:for the spring the reserves will be well started and the storage temperature may not be sufficient to make ecs, being a pilot project must still have a way of bearing in caseObamot wrote: Why an expensive gas plant that will need to be depreciated?
Why do it, if it is no longer even useful to carry it out, if we can do without it ...?
Napo dwarf wrote:pooling individual means it's a nice concept the equivalent of district heatingObamot wrote: Why make an entire subdivision dependent, while autonomous 100% solutions exist?
The pool of shit, above all!
Look at the PPE, the mismanagement it is! Apartment owners come to pay for heating, upkeep, administration, maintenance and various depreciation costs, as much as conventional rent! And this even when they replaced the janitors with electronic doormen! A real scandal, yes!
Watch shows like Capital on M6, which take down these kinds of scams which you can never get into unless you leave! Still have to find a galore to buy!
Long live independent and autonomous solutions, yet DEAR AT DEDELCO!
Napo dwarf wrote:we give many nobel prizes 25 years after the end of research ^^Obamot wrote: Why primer such a project that is already a little outdated, while there is better elsewhere?
In my corner, they have DELETED all aid for smoky projects! And they were right ... Why? Because now "working" constructions are finally out of the crowd! (The subsidized doorbell shooters had to get dressed ...)
Napo dwarf wrote:the life of a community is like that they are all committed all responsibleObamot wrote: Why a maintenance fee and a system that keeps captive landlords from a large, complex infrastructure ...
So captive, trapped, definitely ... The great deal!
As for talking about "responsibility", the best thing is not to enter it, because there is not there! It's putting your finger on the gear of "empowerment" and we always end up taking you for a dick! (In any case, knowing human nature, the risk is not negligible)
Napo dwarf wrote:to enter a community engaged in a great adventureObamot wrote: Why then become a homeowner if we are dependent on the essential for which we had invested to achieve energy self-sufficiency, if this is not the case?
... yes, or garnish the pockets of promoters and their friends, to whom they send the elevator ... ;-)) It works well in the building (I'm there ...)
Napo dwarf wrote:certainly today but in future projects which they may be 100% independent if we take into account the carbon footprint will have to see. In addition for the elderly or those with physical disabilities they do not have to do any handling (it is as practical as individual gas)Obamot wrote: The traditional MINERGIE houses with SIMPLE wood stove, are BETTER than the Canadian project ...
But this is already the case, with 60% savings on existing constructions! So the new ones are no longer in the pipeline: 100% zero emissions with the new “Minergie P” standard ....
And why on earth is gas, when Canada is so rich in WOOD and its carbon footprint is neutral? Do not understand !!! (Well yes, I understand too well ...)
Napo dwarf wrote:Obamot wrote: Too bad there is a remote gas central heating and it is not the "ZERO EMISSION", as here ...>
now that the first heating seasons have started (it does not work bad at all) why not add storage on the periphery of the current storage and equipped the boiler itself in solar panel or add in solar panels on the ground (on storage )
Yes why ?
As such, I had already pointed out that all the roofs were NOT COMPLETELY covered with thermal solar panels, just a simple portion is still strange isn't it? It is so incongruous that I have always been wary of this project, or NOTHING is clear, definitely!
While the JENNI project provides homes WITHOUT ANY heating bill!
So why bother ... with all this!
(I must be blonde, because it's my job and I haven't understood anything yet ...)