by GuyGadeboisLeRetour »22/10/21, 20:38
Janic wrote:
can you give an example?
I wrote on that ass before. Look in my messages under "GuyGadebois" if that interests you, if not, let piss, I do not want to put the cover back.
and yet that's what you just did by your expression "crook" and I would have liked to know how?
Let's say he "compiles" everything serious people have written before him and sprinkles it all with personal debasements. In short, this guy has only been a follower all his life and he is making his money out of all this chaotic journey.
This is not entirely wrong! But who does not do as much, geniuses who invent new processes are as rare as miracle vaccines. So he compiles, it's true, he follows it is also true, he makes his butter, it is still true as for most of the individuals on this earth who get involved in unmarked, but thorny ways. therefore uses the current media as before the books and journals on these fields.
On the other hand, what is wrong with what he says? I practiced most of what he says before he was even born and even if, on certain rare points, I do not share his opinion, most of it is justified by the experience, the lived experience. It's like homeopathy vilified by those who do not put it into practice but who denigrate its possibilities despite the facts, like the ABCon.
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré