I understand your reaction, but as in the education of children it is by constantly repeating the same thing that it enters the brain, it is called knowledge and Rudolf Steiner added, rightly so, that it is not to inculcate new knowledge which is difficult, but to replace it with the old ones ... and that is particularly difficult.Sorry janic but it's a lot of blabla (already seen, already known ...) and preposterous posturing ...
Nowhere have I read that he claims to be a specialist in himself, but as an experimenter, this experience that is lacking for so many individuals who also pose as specialists in the non-lived.from a self-proclaimed "specialist"
It is not the individual that counts but what he says and demonstrates, otherwise it is useless.but should we expect more from a "Casasnovas"?
Listen to Professor Joyeux who is not a Casasnovas, but whose general discourse is close to it. What does he say? A better lifestyle, avoiding and controlling stress, etc. So what will differ is not the general point of view, but the, the details that make the difference.
Practicing for 50 years, a lifestyle somewhat similar to the speech of Casasnovas but held by other self-proclaimed characters (who in the official speech can do it?) Against the flow of the official speech and even fought by it, c is practice and its results that count, not just speeches. So I patiently await the end of his speech before to express any opinion.
Aren't youtubers individuals who like to watch themselves and hear themselves speak? and self-proclaimed more!In short, a youtuber who likes to watch himself talk ... he would do well to self diagnose:
