Christophe wrote:
Rooh the ugly macho prejudice ... expect a virulent response from Christine ...
No, not even. I agree with Targol when he says that being a woman is his only electoral platform. Because tasting children at school, foreign languages in kindergarten, paternity leave or helping the disabled is a bit short. Of course, no one is against: who is against the establishment of facilities for the disabled? Who would like to take the bread out of the mouth of our little cherubs? But it's too easy. Politics is not just that.
So to be more serious, she is making a program for 2007. And what do we see appearing: putting delinquents "in a service with military supervision", stopping paying people for doing nothing, reducing the state's life cycle , to be against homosexual marriage because "the family is a father and a mother" - well except when one is interviewed by a gay newspaper because in this case one declares the opposite. In short, we feel that we have advised him to be firm in order to erase his "goofy" image while continuing to play proximity. After all, people on the left are also afraid for their small 30-year-old suburban lodge, it's not just sarko who has the right to play in these flower beds. Except that I can smell a rather nauseating odor there, a little hint of "work-family-homeland" which scares me away.
Am I wrong or are you looking for me? so what, you did not digest the mushrooms from last night?