Warning at a nuclear power plant in Slovenia

Books, television programs, films, magazines or music to share, counselor to discover ... Talk to news affecting in any way the econology, environment, energy, society, consumption (new laws or standards) ...
martien007
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 565
Registration: 25/03/08, 00:28
Location: planet Mars

Warning at a nuclear power plant in Slovenia




by martien007 » 04/06/08, 20:40

Announced in the FR newspaper at 20 p.m.

If there is no follow-up, beware and remember Chernobyl .... everything was going very well for us, it was far away, no risk in France, but in Germany ban on mowing lawns, to collect vegetables ... etc.

Well, it seems nothing, just a European alert like that for a joke.

Long live nuclear power: no CO2 but for the rest it will be fearful when there will be all over the world.
0 x
georges100
Éconologue good!
Éconologue good!
posts: 338
Registration: 25/05/08, 16:51
x 1




by georges100 » 04/06/08, 20:46

you're unfair ... france has taken action for chernobyl ...
the proof we have stopped the alert network ...
since when does the oil light on my car come on i quickly repaired by removing the bulb : Cheesy:
0 x
User avatar
Flytox
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 14138
Registration: 13/02/07, 22:38
Location: Bayonne
x 839




by Flytox » 04/06/08, 20:48

Considering the brèles which govern us and the confidence which one can grant to them when it comes to nuclear power, we should perhaps take the lead and monitor the weather in Slovenia and the surrounding area from now on. Without use weather forecast France of course (state body obliges) .... Better to be safe than sorry .... : Evil:

By the way, it is a former eastern country used to transparency ..., both the incident is already several days away and we are told that now ...
A+
0 x
Reason is the madness of the strongest. The reason for the less strong it is madness.
[Eugène Ionesco]
http://www.editions-harmattan.fr/index. ... te&no=4132
georges100
Éconologue good!
Éconologue good!
posts: 338
Registration: 25/05/08, 16:51
x 1




by georges100 » 04/06/08, 20:52

no it's recent ... otherwise vladimir would have warned us : Cheesy:
if he can screw a Slovenian in the shit he wastes no time : Cheesy:
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79112
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10972




by Christophe » 04/06/08, 21:18

BRUSSELS (AFP) - The European Commission on Wednesday triggered the European warning system on radioactive risks after an incident at a nuclear power plant in Slovenia, in Krsko, which is being shut down.

"So far, no leakage into the environment has been identified," the Commission said in a statement.

"There is no danger for the population and the environment", added a spokeswoman for the Slovenian EU Presidency in Brussels, Maja Kocijancic, stressing that the leak did not concern any radioactive material, but water.

The European emergency radioactivity information system ECURIE received a warning message from Slovenia at 15 p.m. GMT after the detection of a leak in the cooling system of the power plant in southwestern Slovenia , the Commission said in a press release.

The information was then communicated to all member states.

The plant decided to shut down the reactor, whose power was reduced to 22% around 17 p.m. GMT.

This warning system was created by the EU in 1987 after the explosion of the Soviet Chernobyl power plant. It allows Member States to communicate in the event of a "major nuclear accident or radioactive emergency", according to the Commission.

It is used frequently, said Commission Energy spokesperson Ferran Tarradellas. But it's very rare that Brussels deems the incident worth publicizing.

The Krsko power plant (120 km from Ljubljana) was shut down for a month at the end of last year for maintenance work.

Jointly operated by Slovenia and Croatia, it was built by the American-Japanese consortium Westinghouse and commissioned in 1983. It produces 20% of the electricity consumed in Slovenia and 15% of that used in Croatia.

Slovenia announced last year a project to build a second reactor for this plant by 2017.


http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hoN ... bS87U6Wt3w

And the water in the primary circuit is perhaps not a radioactive material? : Mrgreen:
0 x
User avatar
Flytox
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 14138
Registration: 13/02/07, 22:38
Location: Bayonne
x 839




by Flytox » 04/06/08, 21:22

Found this on gogol-earth, luckily, it's a well-defined area:
Note the blue point at the bottom right


Image



The blue point is enlarged, there, not if it is a grain silo or the power plant that is going .... ?????? : Evil:




Image

In this photo, there seem to be some similarities, it must be the right one.


Image

A+
0 x
Reason is the madness of the strongest. The reason for the less strong it is madness.

[Eugène Ionesco]

http://www.editions-harmattan.fr/index. ... te&no=4132
martien007
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 565
Registration: 25/03/08, 00:28
Location: planet Mars




by martien007 » 05/06/08, 09:15

On the enlarged photo of the site, we can see cooling water flowing into the river.

If this water is radioactive, it is possible that it is below the European standard, so "get a good night's sleep" and in 10 or 20 years, it will be like the PCBs in our rivers.

I tell you that with European standards they want to swallow all the snakes to the people: anesthesia operation in progress, awakening difficult in 20 years or then direct cemetery.
0 x
jonule
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2404
Registration: 15/03/05, 12:11




by jonule » 05/06/08, 09:38

pfff and the Slovenes are they ISO too? -)
how is it that EDF passes the ISO14000 environmental standards?

What does "irradiation is not dangerous below such a quantity" mean?
what does quantity mean? is it better a gram of enriched (artificial) plutonium 10.000 times more powerful than 1kg of fossil uranium (natural)?

Can you tell us Rémundo, nuclear specialist?


what is the difference between internet and external irradiation?

once again the lobby has confused people enough, it's true ...





hold for the wind map:
http://www.xcweather.co.uk/?Loc=FR

hey, it looks like it's blowing through our house!

good do you remember apple pectin to remove heavy metals? which does not reduce the risk of the tyroid ..... ah no that's due to diesel particles according to the media! -))))))))))))



Nuclear ? that's great !
0 x
Bougonnator
I understand econologic
I understand econologic
posts: 61
Registration: 07/06/06, 11:06
Location: Ile-de-France




by Bougonnator » 05/06/08, 09:49

All cooling water from thermal power plants of all types flows into rivers or the sea. A primary circuit is in contact with the water from the reactor and transfers its heat to a secondary circuit. These two circuits are in closed circuit. The secondary water is heated, pressurized to be transformed into steam and is used to turn the alternator through the various stages of the turbines.
This water is recondensed to make a new loop.
A cooling circuit is used to evacuate the calories captured during condensation and its water is evacuated to the waterways. This is why the power stations stop producing when the water in the rivers is too hot not to heat it even more and destroy the fauna.
We can hope that they did not do like the unconscious of Chernobyl which had deactivated all the securities and the alarms to carry out its little experiments hacks. The control panel must then look like a hell of a Christmas tree.
0 x
jonule
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2404
Registration: 15/03/05, 12:11




by jonule » 05/06/08, 10:19

This is why the power stations stop producing when the water in the rivers is too hot not to heat it even more and destroy the fauna.

this is mainly because afterwards they cannot cool the power station enough!
As for the rejected T ° C limits, EDF (and not AREVA) obtained T ° C limit overruns during the last heatwaves, so it has exceeded the limits more than once already ...

for cooling water you should know that even if the networks are physically separated, through a wall irradiation still takes place!
CRIIRAD, an independent body if there is one, has many times observed abnormal discharges into rivers of elements derived from irradiation without direct contact ...

We can hope that they did not do like the unconscious of Chernobyl

yes, we can always hope ... that it doesn't happen tomorrow, but the day after tomorrow?
made by people who do not have the information of the seriousness of this technology and who do not work with the same standards ....

for the unconscious of Chernobyl, it turns out that the security guy was hired as an interim : Cheesy:
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Media & News: TV shows, reports, books, news ..."

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 180 guests