9 / 11: Testimony on WTC pickup trucks

Books, television programs, films, magazines or music to share, counselor to discover ... Talk to news affecting in any way the econology, environment, energy, society, consumption (new laws or standards) ...
perplex
Éconologue good!
Éconologue good!
posts: 416
Registration: 11/06/07, 13:04
x 63

Re: 9 / 11: Testimony on WTC pickup trucks




by perplex » 03/08/11, 20:38

moinsdewatt wrote:
bernardd wrote:The testimonies come out:
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/08/01/127327/
and blah blah and blah bala blah


and it starts again all this bullshit? : Evil:


Well it's funny I think the same thing, we will not get out.
You close the door, they go through the window : Shock:
The testimonies come out:
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/08/01/127327/

Vans came several weeks each night before the 9 / 11 - 11 September 2001 explosions - in the WTC towers, leaving plenty of time for explosive demolition.


When this is the total, just read, but everyone does what they can, we say vans, after we teach you, two or three, "are not sure, that's it revelation? " and all taken on video. It's not giving a damn about the world, it's two or three or ten, what's the big clue .....

it's a real big revelation, I have goosebumps ..
it is especially grain to grind to furnish the idle ...... read Here it is funnier and less stupid.

See you in 20 years on the same thread ....
Last edited by perplex the 04 / 08 / 11, 09: 09, 1 edited once.
0 x
The world is perfect !!!
moinsdewatt
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5111
Registration: 28/09/09, 17:35
Location: Isére
x 554




by moinsdewatt » 03/08/11, 21:04

With the 10th anniversary of the events, it is sure that lots of conspiracy theory will emerge.

AND by the way, in one of the vans there was not Elvis Presley in the flesh?
0 x
Gébé
Éconologue good!
Éconologue good!
posts: 361
Registration: 08/08/09, 20:02
x 65




by Gébé » 03/08/11, 21:40

dedeleco wrote:and the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq invented to justify the attack on Iraq by deceiving the Americans


And the same people who would have mounted this colossal "absurd" * manipulation involving thousands of accomplices (voluntary or not) would not have been able to find a handful to intelligently dispose of some of these weapons on Iraqi territory. invaded....!?

* as the "guy who gets funny in his old age" would say : Lol:
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538




by Obamot » 03/08/11, 22:04

Gébé, on the other hand, does not have to be in his old age to play Auguste.

But I feel that he will soon tell us - among the five versions of bin Laden's summary execution which have been given to the press by the White House - which is the right one?

Damn, it's really too stupid, the only one who could have raised the doubt, they would have shot him coldly with two bullets in the head on May 2, 2011 ... (well ... if we believe the last known scenario, because after all, had he not already died before?)

No, it's really too stupid ... So the international community - which was entitled to expect a fair trial from a democratic country, will never know ... This is all the more so since each nation in the coalition has had many soldiers killed in Iraq and Afghanistan. But whose fault is it? Certainly not for those who are just asking legitimate questions about basic questions in criminology!

Where are the condemnations of this nation - which wants to be a model - and therefore supposed to best represent the rule of law and democracy par excellence? No, it is definitely not those who ask the real questions who are the clowns, but those who persist in not opening their eyes.

This especially since according to his wife, he was not armed, (so if we believe them huh ... because in the end, even if they one day spread the truth to us, there would not be much left to believe them).

The doubt remains and it is immense, that yes, it is incontestable.

And in any case, it gives you no right to spread your certainties and even less to be as aggressive even when apart from your personal attacks, your posts are empty of all reasoning.
Last edited by Obamot the 03 / 08 / 11, 22: 24, 1 edited once.
0 x
Gébé
Éconologue good!
Éconologue good!
posts: 361
Registration: 08/08/09, 20:02
x 65




by Gébé » 03/08/11, 22:15

Obamot wrote:Gébé does not have to be old-fashioned to be a clown.

You're painful ... : roll: and in addition I am .... old : Lol:
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538




by Obamot » 03/08/11, 22:32

[Edited]: White clown or Auguste it's the same, in the end what will have served you your 'experience'!

It's always the same people who are ironic, but concretely their posts are often empty of reasoning. It's crazy how boring they can be at the end, with such blinkers. Image
0 x
dedeleco
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9211
Registration: 16/01/10, 01:19
x 10




by dedeleco » 03/08/11, 22:54

perplex and lessdewatt certainly swallowed their eyes closed the official thesis of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq much more imaginary than the vans visible on the videos of the security cameras, from August 23 to September 3, 2001 !!
In any case, the varied testimonies, in particular of firefighters of very strong explosions in the basement of the WTC outside the planes, visible in videos, are indisputable and even more disturbing, with the demolition of the WTC 7 in one piece by its base on the videos, without having undergone a plane !! The thermite found is indisputable !!

In death toll, the worst is to have done nothing to protect the population of NY, from deadly asbestos dust, with at least ten times more deaths in NY, and to take the pretext of this destruction of the WTC 1 -2 -7 to attack Iraq and cause hundreds of thousands of deaths, or 100 times more, with the manipulation of untrue weapons of mass destruction, to a strategy of shock and disaster who reports to whom ?? to the profiteers of the US military-industrial-financial system around the Bushes !!
The stock market took advantage before September 11, 2001 !!

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/08/01/127327/
Late on the night of August 23, 2001, at about 3 am security cameras in the parking garage of the World Trade Center captured the arrival of two or three truck vans.

Visual examination determined the vans were separate and unique from trucks used by janitorial services, including different colors and devoid of markings. More curious, all the janitorial trucks had pulled out of the Towers by about 2:30 am — about half an hour before the second set of vans arrived.

According to my high level State Department source with a top security clearance, who disclosed the unusual nightly activity, no vans matching that description had entered the World Trade Center at such an hour in any of the weeks or months prior to that date. It was a single event.

Security cameras caught the vans leaving the Towers at approximately 5 am — before the first wave of AAA personality types on Wall Street, driving Mercedes and BMWs, arrived to track the markets.

For the next 10 to 12 nights, the same mysterious truck vans arrived at the World Trade Center at the same mysterious hour—after the janitorial crews had left the building and before the most fanatic robber barons on Wall Street showed up for work. The vans appeared at the World Trade Center from approximately August 23, 2001 until September 3 or 4, 2001. After that last night, they never appeared at the Towers again.

The vans were never heard of again, either. The 9/11 Commission was never informed of their surprising presence in the Towers three weeks before the 9/11 attack. Most of the 9/11 Truth Community has no knowledge of this extraordinary nightly activity, either.

For all the public's ignorance, video from the security cameras could be the most significant missing part of the 9/11 puzzle. This State Department source was convinced the mysterious trucks were used to transport explosives into the building, and that an unidentified orphan team wired the World Trade Center for a controlled demolition in those late night hours. He has stayed quiet to protect his job, his retirement pension and his reputation—knowing that others who spoke up have gotten fired or thrown in prison (myself included).


Who benefited from the WTC ?? to the owner of the WTC, full of asbestos with his insurance taken 3 months before when he purchased !!

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php? ... &aid=25762
1) The New York Port Authority was having difficulty renting out space in the Twin Towers. More importantly there was a huge asbestos liability. Surprisingly these Towers were sold to a new owner Larry Silverstein just three months prior — who managed to get an insurance contract for a big payout if any of the Tower buildings got hit by an airplane. This is a fact.

Investors of profitable corporations connected to the military industrial complex made a killing

But after the bombing shake-up, people connected with the heroin trade in Central Asia reaped billion dollars rewards — including money-laundering groups of financiers — such as banksters, etc. (And this is pretty much all the US military / intelligence has really accomplished — despite all the rhetoric and high-sounding goals about exporting democracy.) This is fact and not fiction.

Nevertheless despite things not going as planned oil companies for whatever reason reaped huge profits. Fact and not fiction.

0 x
perplex
Éconologue good!
Éconologue good!
posts: 416
Registration: 11/06/07, 13:04
x 63




by perplex » 04/08/11, 00:07

dedeleco wrote:perplex and lessdewatt certainly swallowed their eyes closed the official thesis of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq much more imaginary than the vans visible on the videos of the security cameras, from August 23 to September 3, 2001 !!
In any case, the varied testimonies, in particular of firefighters of very strong explosions in the basement of the WTC outside the planes, visible in videos, are indisputable and even more disturbing, with the demolition of the WTC 7 in one piece by its base on the videos, without having undergone a plane !! The thermite found is indisputable !!


Hi Dedeleco,

As much as I appreciate your econological interventions, as much there I think that we are moving towards anything, this is my last post on this thread.

believe or know, maybe you should review the believing part and your sources on this one.
0 x
The world is perfect !!!
dedeleco
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9211
Registration: 16/01/10, 01:19
x 10




by dedeleco » 04/08/11, 01:24

It is not belief, neat and clear facts that cast complete doubt on official theses that do not take it into account !!

Who benefits from this disaster?

To the owner who had just bought the WTC good for asbestos removal !!
linsurance paid in cash for this rapid asbestos removal that will kill more than 30000 people in NY by breathing toxic dust!!
Real and objective fact !!

To Bush and companies with lots of profits in the military industrial oil system, which led us to financial disaster with colossal debt !!
Some on the stock market knew before and speculated before September 11 to gain lots of profits after !!

So how to believe this whole rotten system ????
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491




by Janic » 04/08/11, 10:44

Whether one is for or against the conspiracy theory there remains something that raises questions when we see the immense precautions taken by fireworks to demolish a building, and even more so a tower, so that it collapses vertically (see the emissaries demolissuers of the extreme) and there as if by chance, 3 gigantic towers collapse to perfection without artifices? Well done, champions the architects who can now do without fireworks since a few thousand liters of kerosene at the top of the towers are enough.
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Media & News: TV shows, reports, books, news ..."

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 187 guests