Well, I don't mind at all that a politician realizes his mistakes and draws the consequences, it is unfortunately too rare
PS: For your 4,5 billion, wouldn't you confuse turnover and profit sometimes?

Heuuu .... He especially demonstrated that he was like the majority of politicians, in the pay of the organic / ecological lobby.
The "industrial" lobby doesn't give a damn about glyphosate, it even pisses him off, there's nothing to scratch. And conservation agriculture is a bit the same.

Macron had promised it and now the minister http://www.lafranceagricole.fr/actualites/parole-de-ministre-il-faut-maintenir-le-glyphosate-en-agriculture-de-conservation-1,12,565358103 .html Hope is allowed :) https: //www.terre-net.fr/actualite-agricole/politique-syndicalisme/article/l-agricul ...

Macron had promised it and now the minister http://www.lafranceagricole.fr/actualites/parole-de-ministre-il-faut-maintenir-le-glyphosate-en-agriculture-de-conservation-1,12,565358103 .html Hope is allowed :) https: //www.terre-net.fr/actualite-agricole/politique-syndicalisme/article/l-agricul ...

This poor janic went completely into scratched disc mode: he repeats in loop on all subjects and on all subjects: it is the one who says it who is it - it is the one who says it who it is - it is the one who says it who is - ......
It is of interest

This poor janic has totally gone into broken record mode: he repeats in a loop about everything and on all subjects: it is the one who says it who is - it is the one who says it who is - it ' is the one who says it who is - it is the one who says it who is - it is the one who says it who is - ...... ...

organic has been the future for 70 years and in 70 years it will still be the future. I don't think it will last 70 years. In the current situation, organic is developing very quickly, with growth of 15% per year. The vast majority of the population, the media and decision-makers push in this direction ....

Absolutely, it helps relieve people who (as ABC2019 pointed out) without it would needlessly take drugs with harmful side effects.
Where it is dangerous is when it diverts patients suffering from serious illnesses from essential treatment.

It is possible .... but for the moment, the means to measure its effectiveness exist and conclude that it is real and equal to that of placebos.

What is the problem ?