No!!! It is potentially usable energy! Come on one last example after I stop trying to educate you (if your teachers didn't succeed, I couldn't ...) You see my hand? Well, as long as she hasn't slapped you, it's still an energy potential compared to the energy system ...

Just like gravitation is energy No, it is an energy POTENTIAL ... hence my example of stone ... So it's good that you speak of gravity ... may that make you understand? POTENTIAL of energy? it is energy there is no potential! when the masses attract there is no ...

Hic wrote:corrective
A permanent magnet does not produce energy, it is energy

Just like gravitation is energy

without the energy of gravitation nothing would exist except hygrogen

so it's energy!



Energy is mass with square kinetics

corrective
A permanent magnet does not produce energy, it is energy

yeah Hic, I would like to take you in front of a blackboard to put in equation a machine with direct current ... or even better, since you are so wired, an asynchronous machine. I would laugh well to see you unable to calculate the efforts of Laplace or an electromotive field. I point out that ...

She answers your question, but even taking simple examples, you don't understand. I was explaining reality to you, but you prefer fiction. Are you a product of TV and video games or what? Crafts, you will see that the laws of physics cleared by the ancients will help you move forward ...

She answers your question, but even taking simple examples, you don't understand. I was explaining reality to you, but you prefer fiction. Are you a product of TV and video games or what? Crafts, you will see that the laws of physics cleared by the ancients will help you move forward ...

this partially "relativistic" engine necessarily needs a counter reaction in effective opposition, whether in the form of visible magnetism and or of relativistic compensation, how does it work? "You don't have to wiggle your ass to shit straight" said an old man. You take a c ...

and your French, he is also relativist? "I teach it to you S" "develop" and not "develloper" you can develop your ideas well here. But frankly, you are lunar. I have also just corrected your title "1st step towards the unknown, Electric motor Analysis Differ ...

"theoretical practice", a new discipline? no! you did not know? I teach it to you that devellope the imagination, one remains logical but by necessarily theorizable which makes all its interest and from today an electric motor is "relatistic" contrary to you ...