ARMAND wrote:@ Obamo: I did not know this gizmo, it's serious right now The mouth of the neighborsObamot wrote:Wanting to protect the LLW9 is a bit like wanting to protect the "Tinguely Machine":
source: http://www.notrehistoire.ch/photo/full_view/3986/
The 1st version of the "Berne Convention" is sufficient, as long as the "thing" is useless : Mrgreen:
... only to protect the drawing is relevant.
The drawing / plans etc ... of this object are actually covered by the Bern Convention ... Even if it is useless elsewhere!
There's kekchoz of LLW9, I mean seen from the angle of "trends"of the time ... I like the sort of parable at the top!
It gave him a look "conspirOfScience"from hell!
It's stupid, was not far from the Stirling engine or thermodynamic solar! (but much more complicated!)
The guy would not have curved the courses, would have put his genius in biochemistry, or physics, he would perhaps have discovered photosynthesis-based photovoltaics or discovered the boson before Higgs, Finally, the designers of LLW9, it is who other than "artists" like Jean Tinguely!