chatelot16 wrote:to do it on August 23, it's already too late, and to allow installation of 3KW as economically as possible, it will be a bit later than tomorrow
to make 300W with wild injection on the network, it can be done right away,
1) shit, time flies!
Of course I wanted to say "tomorrow ..."
2) Explain to me what would I have to gain with an "illegal" installation compared to a 3 kWp kit installed with buyback ???
With the illegal injection, I decrease, when my consumption is lower than my production, a small piece of my bill.
The PV producing especially on say 9 am - 16 pm in summer, I consume little. Obviously, I will "program" the maximum of devices on it. The surplus, I give it ...
I use 3 kWh / year. Am I going to save 000% of that?
At 13,5 cents per kWh (which I pay tax included), that would make 300 * 0,135 = 40 euros per year.
Explain to me why it would be more profitable than a connected kit ???
Again, some people don't want to be hooked up, I understand that and admit it.
For the reasons I have given, this subsidy system does not shock me. Beyond its "technical" imperfections, I am even clearly in favor of it (because this amounts to "bogging down" the cost of electricity, mainly nuclear, and I am for it).
It therefore seems to me "more profitable" ...
Or explain to me the opposite (profitability in the TRI sense) ...
I am also willing to hear the elements on the carbon footprint (but there again, I don't see where the "injection" option would be superior to the "legal kit" option; the results would rather be in favor of this bottom line if we opt for European or German stuff ...)