It's true, we can be satisfied with the 95% yield that the technique offers us today, but I always tried to understand. A forum that's it for that.
I have often written stupid things, but at least we are progressing in our understanding. Understanding how it works can also make it possible to better choose from the market offer, to better predict its future installation ... While posting, I am still learning.
It is interesting to understand the difference between an inverter at 50 € advertised 6 Kw and another at 800, advertised 3 kVA. You realize that for the first, it is the maximum peak-to-peak power and that in reality, in nominal power, you should rather rely on 2.5 kVA. In addition with a lower yield and not the essential functionality such as standby on extended idle operation and network synchronization, for example ... Finally, the first, you may not use it ...
The material gains in weight and lifespan, you have to weigh the pros and cons for a second-hand purchase.
The manufacturers do not easily give their diagram, this is normal, given the cost of the research, but just by seeing the inside of the case like the photo of the previous micro-inverter, we see:
- that the papa transformers no longer exist, guaranteeing better performance and less no-load losses ... the absence of a cooling fan testifies to this.
- avoid the chemical capacitors often responsible for breakdowns and limiting the life of the product.
We also understand that the offer with several micro inverters instead of a large one is becoming common. Another advantage, an inverter failure does not prevent the operation of the rest and we can complete its installation without straining the budget ...