Remundo wrote:Precisely, U is not constant ...
It takes me for an idiot ... It's not you who said 5 posts above:
Remundo wrote:
Because it can also be content to limit its current to maintain its tension.
Remundo wrote:We call that
a solar charge controller in isolated site. Example
the Steca SolarixAny off-grid inverter is a charge regulator, even more complex if it converts from DC to AC 220V ...
A charge regulator and an inverter are two totally different devices that do not have the same function at all.
We are talking about a
off-grid inverter
There's no point in trying to do pirouettes to try to be right.
An off-grid inverter, commonly known as a voltage converter, simply transforms a low voltage DC into 230V / 50HZ
Il
does not integrate an MPPT algorithm et
don't lower her blood pressure to adapt to an overload that would be longer than a current draw.
If the connected load requires more current than it can supply, it goes into safety mode.
If the DC voltage source to which it is connected cannot provide the power that it itself must provide, and this voltage therefore drops, it also goes into safety.
The work of a solar charge regulator, even MPPT, is quite different and it was not mentioned in the original question of the subject, nor even in the debate which followed to know if an inverter of less than 2000VA could supply power. a load of 2000VA
And even somewhat hybrid devices like the sunny island SMA which integrate charge regulator, inverter and charger, do not have this behavior.
In stand-alone mode, either it can provide the requested power and maintain the voltage, or it cannot be cut.
It's a bit normal, it's a bit like ErDF saying, "well, the network is temporarily overloaded, you all go to 110V for a few minutes" ... I can't imagine the damage!
So I do not see why an inverter, supposed to replace the network, would have this behavior ...