Exnihiloest wrote: there it is clear, with your incomprehension of my answer
In all the answers that you quibble, you invert subject and code.
That does not make sense.
So in this fog, your ego is always satisfied.
poor creature
Exnihiloest wrote: there it is clear, with your incomprehension of my answer
Exnihiloest wrote:Obamot wrote:...he mixes up...
...he's not screwed...
"Elite minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, mediocre minds discuss people."
Jules Romains
As if we were showing this kind of show at a competition.gegyx wrote:When we saw a circus act, with badly trained animals, or visibly beaten, it was unbearable... and banned since.
It has the same effect on me.
A show ?
Couldn't even get up on his shaking leg.
Reread with your finger what I was answeringExnihiloest wrote:Obamot wrote:Exnihiloest wrote:call it racist.
[•••] the idiots [•••] fought by the reactionaries [•••] But what shit the extreme right, they don't miss a thing!
[•••] not damn understand that these questions have nothing to do with "the integration" (absolutely no one here has said that they reject either one or the other) but with the publicity that should be avoided giving to these LGBT movements, wokists and others (they take care of it without us), quite happy that some (not all*) are instrumentalized and financed to serve other ends (cancel culture, macronist sect and other blissful assimilations of the lowlands) and of course, let's not generalize. being in the spotlight, the facts differentiate themselves from other genres, which precisely harms their wish (if one understands its gibberish) to be "integrated"...
We really have here an ignoramus of first making sleeve effects, but I think about it maybe is it "trans-kek-choz“given the trouble he has… to “integrate”
*) since others aspire to a certain discretion.
- "Elite minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, mediocre minds discuss people."
Jules Romains
Apart from contradicting you in the same post, absolutely not. It is a kind of staging — the practice of a sport having absolutely nothing to do with "genderism"subjects who devote themselves to it, proof is also that ice skating is a dangerous sport, you can cut yourself or break your bones while practicing it (you pick up speed and the ice is hard like concrete) — the purpose of this performance so what is it? If it is that of a 'show off' (which, let's be honest, is hardly convincing) or is it a question of making the spectators feel sorry for the fate of those who devote themselves to it under these conditions? (or something like that), by instilling in them a feeling of palpable unease, with the rather childish aim of vainly attracting attention through deliberately clumsy behavior, I would even say quite similar to a form of 'exhibitionism'? I mean that whatever the "gender", compassion for this suffering goes beyond the practice of a sport, it would be well if it could be heard and expressed differently.izentrop wrote:As if we were showing this kind of show at a competition.gegyx wrote:It has the same effect on me.
A show ?
Couldn't even get up on his shaking leg.![]()
You are the pitiful ones to swallow anything, as long as it excites your lowest instincts
Christophe wrote:I don't see... which one is it?
Yes these young girls do not realize that it is disastrous for their health.Christophe wrote:How sad :
https://www.parismatch.com/Actu/Societe ... es-1805596English health institutions report an increase in ten years of… 3% in the number of teenage girls seeking testosterone treatment in order to become masculinized.
Back to "Society and Philosophy"
Users browsing this forum : Bing [Bot] and 86 guests