:24/04/25, 10:51
ahmed
Janic wrote:It is also that science (+ technology) which was once the bearer of dreams has not brought what was expected: if it has contributed greatly to the resolution of problems, it has created new ones which seem almost insoluble. I do not draw from this observation a condemnation, just the fact that too much was probably hoped for and also that the scientific approach is poorly understood, hence inevitable disillusionment.
gfgh64excellent/ Why not apply it to the vaccination topic which, however, fits it perfectly, down to the comma?
It’s a forum made to compare different opinionsWithout wanting to interfere in a post that is not intended for me, I will do it anyway!!!!
gfgh64,
A philosophical approach can be general in scope to the extent that it expresses an opinion, not tangible, measurable, verifiable facts applied to a single subject. Try it and you'll see that it fits just as well!How can we claim that the post you quote fits perfectly, "with the comma ready" for vaccination?
gfgh64
So maybe you misread, or in any case too little! Indeed, to assert that such a measure contributed to... (regardless of the subject) you need indisputable proof, which is not the case here, but just cultural beliefs and not even scientific ones. But if you have some, let us benefit from them!while it contains ""I quote Ahmed"" if it contributed significantly to the resolution of problems, which, according to what I had read of your posts on the vaccine (it seems to me) is absolutely not the case
gfgh64
Indeed, a so-called scientific approach may have been misunderstood or, more simply, it may be understood in various ways. Here again, we first need facts, then Slavic figures and finally proof, which in this case is terribly lacking.maybe simply the post, like "I recite Ahmed" the scientific approach is misunderstood,
