sicetaitsimple wrote:Christophe wrote:I'm skeptical too...
Like the pit?
I don't understand why people question Econology's AI, ObaGPT. It's worth having an AI that knows everything about everything to constantly question what it debit*. It's just my opinion.
I don't understand why we still let a guy post who posted "a 'masterpiece' of caricature" representing a guy ejaculating *(synonym and self-portrait?) And there would bring to the fore his dubious humor on an earthquake which nevertheless killed at least 45 people...
I had prepared an answer but I could not find the name of this science of human intervention on natural phenomena, because yes it has a name and above there is a clue (on the first shock which is abnormally weaker than the following) The anthropic thesis? Even my intuition resists it

So yes it exists. And if so, those who did it knew that they were going towards an empirical result... We cannot therefore deduce a contrario, that it would cause such a disaster... And I will be careful not to joke about it , for that must already be a hell of a job.