Environmentalism is politics

[Christophe]

I have not yet spoken in this subject but already the title is biased because if there is a policy which is based on scientific facts *, it is ecology!

Isn't that what you like about Exni science facts?

Economics and finance are not Strong Sciences for me ... scientifically crap!

For the rest, we never said that at EELV there was no rotten: they are men so they have flaws ...

* the concern is that these green idiots do not know how to analyze them well and for the most part only do in restrictive policies if they do not act in the virtuous: they are small minds who often do worse ecologically than politicians not ecological ... I think if we take stock of their stupid decisions!

Hold on to the green steps that you love:

Greta Thunberg
The climate and ecological crisis is intensifying rapidly. The G7 is pouring fantastic amounts into fossil fuels as CO2 emissions are forecast for the second largest annual increase on record.
But G7 leaders really seem to be having a good time presenting empty climate pledges and repeating old broken promises.
Of course, that requires a steak and lobster barbecue celebration as the jet planes soar in the sky above the G7 station!

[Christophe]

I forgot a political ecologist who seeks to enrich himself personally is not one (ecological ... on the other hand he is an impostor, a crook ...) since wealth * is the basic problem of ecology!

* or rather the excess of ...

[Janic]

archinulexnuhul

says the one who spends his time endangering the lives of others by promoting pseudo-science and alternative medicine.

says the one who expresses himself on what he does not know and whom he accuses of evils which he is unable to prove "scientifically".
On the other hand your employers must piss in their pants of happiness to see all the fakenews that you post on the chain!

[Exnihiloest]

 
It's politics, and the dumbest there is:

[Janic]

exmentor

says the one who spends his time endangering the lives of others by promoting pseudo-science and alternative medicine.

when you accuse someone, you have to prove it, according to your own philosophy: where are YOUR proofs that JE endanger the life of others through real sciences that are alternative medicine .

[Exnihiloest]

when you accuse someone, you have to prove it, according to your own philosophy: where are YOUR proofs that JE endanger the life of others through real sciences that are alternative medicine .

Appeal to affects, for lack of intelligence of complex questions, which have their answers only in simple manipulated minds. We know the technique of rotten propaganda.

[Exnihiloest]

I have not yet spoken in this subject but already the title is biased because if there is a policy which is based on scientific facts *, it is ecology!
...

Totally agree. But where do you see ecology in ecologism? Environmentalism is a political movement.

A political movement that recovers a science, I'll let you guess what becomes.

Hitler used science to prove the "Germanity of the Rhine", and he introduced racial hygiene, genetics, population policy, and "race science" to biology lessons.
Joseph Stalin gave his support to Lysenko's theses which affirm that the gains are hereditary (thesis obviously discredited later).
Like the "climate-skeptic", the one who criticized Lysenko's theses in Stalin's time would be accused today of being a "hereditary skeptic".

When scientific theses become state, they become official truth. This is what is happening today with RCA. If we dispute it, it is therefore because we are in the pay of the polluters and we want the death of future generations. These accusers who make such remarks, on this forum also and with your support, obey the same mechanisms that set up totalitarian dictatorships.

[Christophe]

I'm posting this here ... so much the current political ecologists are profound morons... when you're so stupid, don't drink Madame (jsépaki) ...



So, the engineer answers you: IF IF IF Madam TWh it matters and if if if Madam you need an engineer to explain it to you and do the calculations ... and if if the (good) political choices are based on technological realities!

In short break yourself pov conne! As the other would have said!

[sen-no-sen]

The worst part about it is that Sandrine Rousseau is a teacher .... economics !!!
Frankly I would like to meet her! History to explain a little how it works!

Sandrine Rousseau Listen, born March 8, 1972 in Maisons-Alfort (Val-de-Marne), is a French economist, writer and politician.
Teacher-researcher in economics, it leads its work in the fields of environmental economics, domestic jobs and corporate social responsibility. She is vice-president of the University of Lille in charge of university life.

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandrine_Rousseau

[Christophe]

Another political crook ...