A 'is at the end, because in the context which is ours, no one would invest a sum to risk it in a company and to withdraw from it at best an identical sum: it is therefore necessary, by definition *, that A 'is greater than A. I specify that it is related to the unit of goods produced (or to the total of what is produced, which does not change anything).
* Since this is the goal of any business, long before producing any utility which is only a condition (which can sometimes be avoided and in this case it obviously does not change the main thing).
The difference between AMA 'and MAM is essential: in the first case, what is sought is the simple quantitative increase of a capital by the incorporation of human labor in a commodity, while in the second, it is is to exchange products of the same value but with different qualities from the respective point of view of the exchangers: I have too much wheat for my consumption, but I need shoes that I do not produce ... The other , who produces more shoes than he has feet (sic!) would probably like to eat bread; there is equality of practical use value, but asymmetry in relation to particular needs (marginal need).
I was talking about MAM as an example, as it is in the case of a monetarized exchange, but the exchange can be direct in the case of barter. This last method does not present any of the difficulties that we thought we saw in it, since it has been the preeminent mode of operation of the human species: there is no need for an equality of exchanges if the possibility of a subsequent unequal exchange in the other direction is possible whatever the subsequent exchanger ... It is an implicit perpetual debt system that money will only institutionalize, but in a completely different spirit, with the consequences that we can see .
Presentation of innovative or unknown tools
Re: Presentation of interesting or innovative tools unknown
0 x
"Please don't believe what I'm telling you."
Re: Presentation of interesting or innovative tools unknown
Hi everybody,
here are innovative garden tools
here are innovative garden tools
0 x
- Exnihiloest
- Econologue expert
- posts: 5365
- Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
- x 660
Re: Presentation of interesting or innovative tools unknown
An interesting tool, if we go back in time.
I'm getting ready (I haven't had to use it yet, but I keep, you never know ...).
Can anyone recognize him? (and no cheating with Google, I have the answer ).
I'm getting ready (I haven't had to use it yet, but I keep, you never know ...).
Can anyone recognize him? (and no cheating with Google, I have the answer ).
- Attachments
-
- tool.jpg (456.26 KiB) Viewed 1716 times
0 x
- GuyGadeboisTheBack
- Econologue expert
- posts: 14958
- Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
- Location: 04
- x 4359
Re: Presentation of interesting or innovative tools unknown
Ahmed wrote:I was talking about MAM as an example, because it is in the case of a monetarized exchange ...
(She was on the sidewalk, Michèle Alliot Marie?)
0 x
Re: Presentation of interesting or innovative tools unknown
No, but political politics: it's basically the same thing, but more distinguished, at least according to some.
1 x
"Please don't believe what I'm telling you."
- Exnihiloest
- Econologue expert
- posts: 5365
- Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
- x 660
Re: Presentation of interesting or innovative tools unknown
AD 44 wrote:A smother?
Lost ! Come on, I give the solution because I'm not sure this tool is used in all areas.
It's a dung mold. And after drying, we used the "pancakes" for the fire.
0 x
Re: Presentation of interesting or innovative tools unknown
Ahhhh ok!
Well I didn't know ... I had never seen that.
Well I didn't know ... I had never seen that.
0 x
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 133 guests