Janic wrote:No more! This assumption is not necessarily taken from biblical texts, the scientists cited do not refer to it.
Janic:
"quote is not worth reason".
If we put aside the quotes prior to the contemporary era specific to the deist system of thought, the rest does not seem very convincing to me.
The remark of
Trinh Xuan Thuan on the fine tuning of the universe corresponds entirely to the bias cited above on the probability of seeing a pan of water spontaneously boil.
In the absence of favorable conditions, the probability of water boiling is equal to the probability of a fire breaking out in your house.
In purely theoretical conditions (i.e. imagining a closed and sealed circuit for billions of years), we would probably have to wait a period much longer than the age of the universe to observe the spontaneous boiling of water in our "super saucepan".
Yet let it be in a Geyser at
Yellowstone or in your kitchen, boiling water is completely natural under the right pressure and temperature conditions.
Considering the immensity of the Universe (there are about as many stars in the observable universe as there are grains of sand on all the beaches of the Earth!), the probability of the appearance of life is entirely possible.
This is why the extraterrestrial question no longer makes many people laugh in science.
-----------
Regarding the invisible hand in the Universe:
There is indeed a form of intelligence in the Universe, but this does not come from the god of the Bible or from some demiurge, but from the computational characteristics of our Cosmos, this is explained better and better by work in thermodynamics and information science.
Creationism is similar to conspiracy theories, which refuse to understand that the complexity of the world is the work of determinism, preferring to see it as the intervention of ultra-powerful secret societies.
-------
You still haven't answered the complexity argument:
You consider that life is too complex to have appeared without "intervention" if I am not mistaken, but from then on
How do you explain that something even more elaborate than a creator could be at the origin?
"Engineering is sometimes about knowing when to stop" Charles De Gaulle.