Non Dogmatic Opinion on the Work of Chemist Marc Henry

General scientific debates. Presentations of new technologies (not directly related to renewable energies or biofuels or other themes developed in other sub-sectors) forums).
pierrotb
I discovered econologic
I discovered econologic
posts: 8
Registration: 28/01/20, 22:47
x 2

Non Dogmatic Opinion on the Work of Chemist Marc Henry




by pierrotb » 28/01/20, 22:55

Hi
I come back to this forum that I left a long time ago. I am a little surprised when I ran through the little thread on the memory of the water of forum for example futura science. The discussion is closed fairly quickly while research is underway. Today quantum physics is not easily demonstrable and makes us discover new paradigms such as for example that matter would actually be a frequency and that water would be more complex than H20 and would be vector of information via frequencies.
On the issue of few scientific publications, Professor of Chemistry Marc Henry (University of Strasbourg) said interesting things. The researcher's journey in this area is truly undermined and very few take the risk of venturing there out of fear for their career and of being seen as crazy by their colleagues.

Back to my question. I am sending you a video, "quantum approach to water" by researcher Marc Henry, what do you think of what he is putting forward with others from elsewhere? For me it is a very interesting conference for those who take the time to discover it. THANK YOU for remaining courteous and constructive, dogmatism being the dream route of obscurantism.
The thank you box

1 x

izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 11090
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 983
Contact :

Re: Non Dogmatic Opinion on the Work of the Chemist Marc Henry




by izentrop » 29/01/20, 01:09

Sorry but it's gloubiboulga what he says.
It is clear that it cannot pass to futura. This is part of the esoteric part of "producing earthworm". : Mrgreen:

His book is in the esoteric library, I do not invent it https://www.secret-esoterique.com/libra ... henry.html
0 x
pierrotb
I discovered econologic
I discovered econologic
posts: 8
Registration: 28/01/20, 22:47
x 2

Re: Non Dogmatic Opinion on the Work of the Chemist Marc Henry




by pierrotb » 29/01/20, 20:20

A little up do you have any other opinion? : roll:
It does not seem to move the crowds much here, yet it is in my opinion very interesting and promising research but which can be qualified as esoteric according to the sensitivity of each.
0 x
User avatar
GuyGadebois
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6532
Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
Location: 04
x 979

Re: Non Dogmatic Opinion on the Work of the Chemist Marc Henry




by GuyGadebois » 29/01/20, 20:37

pierrotb wrote:A little up do you have any other opinion? : roll:
It does not seem to move the crowds much here, yet it is in my opinion very interesting and promising research but which can be qualified as esoteric according to the sensitivity of each.

I already explained myself on homeopathy, the latest discoveries are positive. Quantum phenomena can also pass for esoteric, therefore everything bathes. The day that we prove scientifically the effectiveness of the granules, I know that they will close their severe slap.
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 4779
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 440

Re: Non Dogmatic Opinion on the Work of the Chemist Marc Henry




by Exnihiloest » 29/01/20, 21:10

izentrop wrote:Sorry but it's gloubiboulga what he says.
It is clear that it cannot pass to futura. This is part of the esoteric part of "producing earthworm". : Mrgreen:

His book is in the esoteric library, I do not invent it https://www.secret-esoterique.com/libra ... henry.html


Same analysis. It is enough to read what he says in the first post to suspect that he does not understand anything about quantum mechanics, and that he is trying to trick us into his beliefs in what is not yet perfectly clear for science but still much more for her than for him, like the H2O molecules which organize themselves in a less simple or more varied way than we thought.
0 x

User avatar
GuyGadebois
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6532
Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
Location: 04
x 979

Re: Non Dogmatic Opinion on the Work of the Chemist Marc Henry




by GuyGadebois » 29/01/20, 21:11

Exnihiloest wrote:Same analysis. It is enough to read what he says in the first post to suspect that he does not understand anything about quantum mechanics ...

But neither do you, my old Tryphon, you understand nothing about quantum mechanics. : Cheesy: : Cheesy: : Cheesy: : Cheesy:
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
pierrotb
I discovered econologic
I discovered econologic
posts: 8
Registration: 28/01/20, 22:47
x 2

Re: Non Dogmatic Opinion on the Work of the Chemist Marc Henry




by pierrotb » 29/01/20, 22:16

Exnihiloest wrote:
izentrop wrote:Sorry but it's gloubiboulga what he says.
It is clear that it cannot pass to futura. This is part of the esoteric part of "producing earthworm". : Mrgreen:

His book is in the esoteric library, I do not invent it https://www.secret-esoterique.com/libra ... henry.html


Same analysis. It is enough to read what he says in the first post to suspect that he does not understand anything about quantum mechanics, and that he is trying to trick us into his beliefs in what is not yet perfectly clear for science but still much more for her than for him, like the H2O molecules which organize themselves in a less simple or more varied way than we thought.


It is not only him who indicates that water is more complex than we imagine. The work of the Japanese Emoto, and that of Ernst Zurchner who tend to prove the same thing on H20 (I am talking about the molecule and not the salts) in trees. Zurchner is one of the most careful and rigorous scientists I know.
Good night
0 x
User avatar
GuyGadebois
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6532
Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
Location: 04
x 979

Re: Non Dogmatic Opinion on the Work of the Chemist Marc Henry




by GuyGadebois » 29/01/20, 23:11

0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 11090
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 983
Contact :

Re: Non Dogmatic Opinion on the Work of the Chemist Marc Henry




by izentrop » 30/01/20, 00:02

GuyGadebois wrote:https://www.maxisciences.com/eau/des-physiciens-decouvrent-un-nouvel-etat-naturel-de-l-eau_art37744.html
https://www.futura-sciences.com/science ... vee-70312/
This is science. : Wink:
Ernst Zurchner, from the little that I listened to him, he mixes science and poetry.
0 x
pierrotb
I discovered econologic
I discovered econologic
posts: 8
Registration: 28/01/20, 22:47
x 2

Re: Non Dogmatic Opinion on the Work of the Chemist Marc Henry




by pierrotb » 30/01/20, 07:54

izentrop wrote:
GuyGadebois wrote:https://www.maxisciences.com/eau/des-physiciens-decouvrent-un-nouvel-etat-naturel-de-l-eau_art37744.html
https://www.futura-sciences.com/science ... vee-70312/
This is science. : Wink:
Ernst Zurchner, from the little that I listened to him, he mixes science and poetry.


Pff with an answer like this excuse me but it makes me regaire ... I rarely get out of my hinges. : Shock:
"the little that I listened to from him". Talk about what you know and educate yourself a little. Have you read it?
On the other hand, the activity of poetry or that of a writer is entirely compatible with that of the life of a scientist. Have a balanced brain you know?
I do not wish to exchange with your discussions and not very constructive reactions.
0 x


 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Science and Technology"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 72 guests