Anti FakeNews: understanding and analyzing information (scientific or other)

General scientific debates. Presentations of new technologies (not directly related to renewable energies or biofuels or other themes developed in other sub-sectors) forums).
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79126
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10974

Anti FakeNews: understanding and analyzing information (scientific or other)




by Christophe » 04/02/21, 14:46

4th of the 6 pages of the psycho web ... today: how to properly analyze information from the web (or elsewhere) to fight against fake news and for the truth!

info.jpg


The method :

Image
0 x
pedrodelavega
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 3791
Registration: 09/03/13, 21:02
x 1311

Re: Anti FakeNews: understanding and analyzing information (scientific or other)




by pedrodelavega » 16/03/21, 07:03



Nothing suprising.
0 x
ABC2019
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12927
Registration: 29/12/19, 11:58
x 1008

Re: Anti FakeNews: understanding and analyzing information (scientific or other)




by ABC2019 » 16/03/21, 07:34

for vaccines, the verdict of the population is clear: people "vote with their feet".
0 x
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)

Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)
ABC2019
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12927
Registration: 29/12/19, 11:58
x 1008

Re: Anti FakeNews: understanding and analyzing information (scientific or other)




by ABC2019 » 16/03/21, 07:36

Christophe wrote:4th of the 6 pages of the psycho web ... today: how to properly analyze information from the web (or elsewhere) to fight against fake news and for the truth!


great these tips!

just out of curiosity, if you had to give names of forumWhether they are near or far from these verification methods, could you do it? (I'm not asking you to give them away, I'm just curious if you think there is a difference in the behavior of forumers against these verification methods).
0 x
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)

Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: Anti FakeNews: understanding and analyzing information (scientific or other)




by Janic » 16/03/21, 07:40

by ABC2019 "16/03/21, 08:34
for vaccines, the verdict of the population is clear: people "vote with their feet".
like you then! The yardstick in terms of vaccinations are the official statistics which are not vaccinosceptics, they, then: why the 90% vaccine addicts (who do not know more than the others) are they afraid to consult the latter?
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
ABC2019
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12927
Registration: 29/12/19, 11:58
x 1008

Re: Anti FakeNews: understanding and analyzing information (scientific or other)




by ABC2019 » 16/03/21, 07:45

Janic wrote:by ABC2019 "16/03/21, 08:34
for vaccines, the verdict of the population is clear: people "vote with their feet".
like you then! The yardstick in terms of vaccinations are the official statistics which are not vaccinosceptics, they, then: why the 90% vaccine addicts (who do not know more than the others) are they afraid to consult the latter?

I don't know what you want to deduce from the statistics on one vaccine anything about another vaccine, but on covid vaccines, the test results are known and they show a high efficiency, over 90%, that are you asking for more?
0 x
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)

Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: Anti FakeNews: understanding and analyzing information (scientific or other)




by Janic » 16/03/21, 08:04

I don't know what you want to deduce from the statistics on one vaccine anything about another vaccine, but on covid vaccines, the test results are known and they show a high efficiency, over 90%, that are you asking for more?
Because, smart guy, we cannot deduce that a vaccine is effective or not, not on a premise, but on a post-epidemic verification! So the States have all the necessary statistics over more than a century to judge, all infectious pathologies combined. For that you have to get your ass out of your chair and go to consult them on the spot.
As a reminder, Pasteurian vaccine addiction is the result of a fraud by PASTEUR CONCERNING a single case, which is contrary to all the rules in pathology.
The question is therefore: why, on a single, non-repetitive case, was it possible to fabricate such a myth?
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79126
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10974

Re: Anti FakeNews: understanding and analyzing information (scientific or other)




by Christophe » 16/03/21, 08:52

pedrodelavega wrote:Nothing suprising.


You speak Charles !!

638 group of what?
10 of what?

It is known and recognized that fake news is 7 times more digital virality than real news and that activist enthusiasts are more active than average Internet users ... so no wonder that fake anti vax circulate faster ... Suddenly it circulates between them ... vicious circle ... That shouldn't worry you !!!

What about the circulation of BP's real lies? Is there not a scandal that is being born on the Astrazeneca vaccine there?
0 x
ABC2019
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12927
Registration: 29/12/19, 11:58
x 1008

Re: Anti FakeNews: understanding and analyzing information (scientific or other)




by ABC2019 » 16/03/21, 08:53

Janic wrote:
I don't know what you want to deduce from the statistics on one vaccine anything about another vaccine, but on covid vaccines, the test results are known and they show a high efficiency, over 90%, that are you asking for more?
Because, smart guy, we cannot deduce that a vaccine is effective or not, not on a premise, but on a post-epidemic verification!

the tests still show an effectiveness, don't you think?
So the States have all the necessary statistics over more than a century to judge, all infectious pathologies combined. For that you have to get your ass out of your chair and go to consult them on the spot.

consult what since your statistics do not concern covid? once again what you observe on one vaccine does not prove anything on another, you would have to look at all the vaccines one by one to judge their effectiveness or not. But even if they were not enough to eradicate the disease, they were still able to have an interest in avoiding deaths, quite simply.
0 x
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)

Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79126
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10974

Re: Anti FakeNews: understanding and analyzing information (scientific or other)




by Christophe » 16/03/21, 08:53

ABC2019 wrote:[if you had to give names of forumWhether they are near or far from these verification methods, could you do it?



Bin if you ask ... otherwise you would say nothing ... : Shock: : Shock: : Shock:

No kidding, do you think you're in an elementary school playground there?
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Science and Technology"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 140 guests