Bullshit and idiocy around the Coronavirus (actions, words, decisions ...)

[reinoso]

the time for trials is coming (especially in the us)

The legal machine launched in Florida against Anthony #Fauci by a group of extremely determined lawyers! On Covid, its origins, the lies and the injections of course.

In its press release, the “Vires Law” group of lawyers writes: “On October 24, 2023, a request for a criminal investigation, in particular concerning the crime of second degree murder via the perpetration of acts of terrorism by Anthony Fauci and several other high-level federal officials, was filed with the Attorney General of the State of Florida”!

The Attorney General this week made it known that he was informed and that he was investigating!

see newsweek of October 30

newsweek.jpg (60.51 KB) Viewed 296 times

[Robob]

Tatiana doesn't know that it's the virus that's causing damage.

Tatiana was humorous.

And this study does not say that the virus causes damage to the brain : she says that on the 11 autopsied brains they sometimes found virus in small quantities. She also says that it is in negligible proportions compared to the respiratory tract and that the autopsy did not reveal any inflammation:
“We observed little evidence of inflammation or direct viral cytopathology outside of the respiratory tract.”
"Extrapulmonary organs often lack histopathological evidence of virally induced injury or inflammation. The paradox of infection outside the respiratory tract without injury or inflammation raises many questions related to pathogens and 'host."

But everything is good for covidists to panic the crowds: we will notice that the author of the study cites "brain" 10 times as an affected organ in his speech including 1 time in the title, 4 times in the abstract and 1 in the title of the graph, but places much less emphasis on the fact that it is without inflammation and a less affected part of the body (see table). We then know why he was paid.

[Janic]

"the extrapulmonary organs often lack evidence histopathological evidence of a lesion or inflammation of viral origin. The paradox of infection outside the respiratory tract without injury or inflammation raises many questions pathogen- and host-related."

but our service scientist will explain all that to us!

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

the time for trials is coming (especially in the us)

The legal machine launched in Florida against Anthony #Fauci by a group of extremely determined lawyers!

Commissioned (the group) by white supremacist extremists (National American Renaissance Movement), crazy to the bone.
Note to idiot: Faucy is a real scumbag and I don't condone his "work".

[pedrodelavega]

Faucy is a real scumbag and I don't condone his "work".

What did he do that was so horrible?
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Fauci?wprov=sfla1

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

He worked for Trump, a raving lunatic in charge, instead of resigning. Not to mention certain conflicts of interest, one of which manifested itself in big lies about the effectiveness of Remdesivir.

[izentrop]

It wasn't a lie, just a treatment not as effective as hoped. https://www.20minutes.fr/sante/2784607- ... e-covid-19

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

https://presse.inserm.fr/absence-deffic ... ral/43790/
https://presse.inserm.fr/discovery-arre ... ite/42034/

[pedrodelavega]

He worked for Trump, a raving lunatic in charge, instead of resigning.

he worked for NIAID and as a health advisor before Trump, during Trump, and after Trump. Fortunately, not all scientists are systematically replaced based on this or that election.
https://www.lemonde.fr/international/ar ... _3210.html

Not to mention certain conflicts of interest

what is the evidence?

one of which manifested itself in big lies about the effectiveness of Remdesivir.

During the remddsivir epiphenomenon, he just got carried away with one or two statements. This does not prove a conflict of interest or a lie.
A mistake no doubt, From there to making a mess of it, it seems excessive to me

[Janic]

20/11/23, 06:2
GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:

Not to mention certain conflicts of interest

when an individual defends an industrial system, it is almost certain that he is in an immediate conflict of interest, which is then confirmed by slipping into these same industries
pedroelzerro

what is the evidence?

and the joker asks for proof when he himself provides none.

During the remddsivir epiphenomenon, he just got carried away with one or two statements. This does not prove a conflict of interest or a lie.
A mistake no doubt, From there to making a mess of it, it seems excessive to me

It's funny that certain choices are described as errors and others, among opponents, as lies. "No, Mr. Judge, I am not guilty, I only made a mistake by raping these children, moreover their parents were consenting in entrusting them to me, it was only an epiphenomenon. Besides all those who accuse me are only conspiracy theorists"