Bullshit and idiocy around the Coronavirus (actions, words, decisions ...)

How to stay healthy and prevent risks and consequences on your health and public health. occupational disease, industrial risks (asbestos, air pollution, electromagnetic waves ...), company risk (workplace stress, overuse of drugs ...) and individual (tobacco, alcohol ...).
User avatar
Macro
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5475
Registration: 04/12/08, 14:34
x 1020

Re: The CONS of Coronavirus




by Macro » 23/07/20, 14:25

Even local shops are doing it ... My butcher sold me a piece of sirloin ... : Mrgreen:
0 x
The only thing safe in the future. It is that there may chance that it conforms to our expectations ...

Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 74055
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 8738

Re: The CONS of Coronavirus




by Christophe » 23/07/20, 15:58

The return of Doctors Mengele et cie ??

0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum - Support the forum doing Useful shopping
User avatar
Adrien (ex-nico239)
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9845
Registration: 31/05/17, 15:43
Location: 04
x 2147

Re: The CONS of Coronavirus




by Adrien (ex-nico239) » 23/07/20, 16:25

Christophe wrote:The return of Doctors Mengele et cie ??


Well seen, the followers of all-powerful research in contempt of human life have their place in this subject ...
0 x
User avatar
GuyGadebois
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6532
Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
Location: 04
x 979

Re: The CONS of Coronavirus




by GuyGadebois » 23/07/20, 16:59

Adrien (ex-nico239) wrote:
Christophe wrote:The return of Doctors Mengele et cie ??


Well seen, the followers of all-powerful research in contempt of human life have their place in this subject ...

Disagree, the parallel is as fallacious as it is erroneous. Mengele did not ask his victims for their opinion, while this experience calls for volunteering. Sometimes you guys screw up hard. : roll:

In practice…

The RESTART-19 project team is therefore looking for 4000 volunteers for their experience which will take place on Saturday August 22; a break is planned between each scenario. Be careful, there is no question here of a COVID-party, consisting in voluntarily transmitting the virus to the participants! On the contrary, all participants (and assistants) must be screened 48 hours before the start of the study ; for this, a free kit will be sent to their home. Only negative people who are not in a risk zone and who have had no contact with a person with COVID-19 will be allowed to participate in the experiment.

On D-Day, the subjects will be brought to the site via a dedicated tram ride. This is also to take into account the contacts made before arriving at the scene of the event. The organizers stress that participating in this experience is not completely without risk; however, this is extremely low. While some previous screening tests may be false negatives, or if the virus has not had time to multiply enough to be detectable, wearing FFP2 masks greatly reduces the risk of transmission. Not to mention that everyone will have to disinfect their hands frequently.

We are far from Auschwitz ...
Image
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 74055
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 8738

Re: The CONS of Coronavirus




by Christophe » 23/07/20, 18:22

GuyGadebois wrote:Disagree, the parallel is as fallacious as it is erroneous. Mengele did not ask his victims for their opinion, while this experience calls for volunteering. Sometimes you guys screw up hard. : roll:


Ok ... take a look back at your history lessons ... at the beginning, in the 30s, deportations were also based on volunteering (at least not forced by violence but they were obviously by lying) ... And that's why the rest of the population accepted it so well. I am convinced that at the beginning millions of Germans thought that the deportees were in kind of holiday camps ...

And in the worst of the war, most of the deportees did not really rebel against their deportation.

Psychological opinion manipulation techniques have not really changed ...

ps: mengele was far from being the worst level crap, I even think it was an assistant ... I don't know why some "sacred" it : Shock:
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum - Support the forum doing Useful shopping

User avatar
GuyGadebois
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6532
Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
Location: 04
x 979

Re: The CONS of Coronavirus




by GuyGadebois » 23/07/20, 18:28

Christophe wrote:Ok ... take a look back at your history lessons ... at the beginning, in the 30s, deportations were also based on volunteering (at least not forced by violence but they were obviously by lying) ...


I think it's up to you to revise (if I dare use that term) your history lessons. : roll:

https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/ ... ps-1933-39
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 74055
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 8738

Re: The CONS of Coronavirus




by Christophe » 23/07/20, 18:39

I was referring to the racial and ideological deportation ... You tell me about political deportations ... obviously that these were forced and the deportee could very well imagine what awaited him (already that the SS had gunned down the SA ... ) ... which was not, necessarily, the case of the Jews at the beginning at least ...

If you want to revise the story we can also wonder why the camps were never destroyed by the allies (in particular, easy and not risky target, the railway lines ...) because the high allied positions knew very well what was going on ... the lie made them seem surprised at the end of the war when the GIs liberated the camps ...

It reminds me of the blow of the masks in much worse however!

Anyway ... let's come back to the other idiots, the current ones, if you don't mind? : Cheesy:
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum - Support the forum doing Useful shopping
User avatar
GuyGadebois
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6532
Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
Location: 04
x 979

Re: The CONS of Coronavirus




by GuyGadebois » 23/07/20, 18:42

Christophe wrote:Anyway ... let's come back to the other idiots, the current ones, if you don't mind? : Cheesy:

You say huge bullshit and you walk away. It's "a little" easy, don't you think?
If we come back to this study, the goal is not to infect people, since only the negatives are chosen, but to understand the mechanisms of propagation of a virus with 3 different protocols. Nothing to do with Mengele (who wrote this name?) Therefore.
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
User avatar
Macro
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5475
Registration: 04/12/08, 14:34
x 1020

Re: The CONS of Coronavirus




by Macro » 23/07/20, 18:45

The worst in there ... is that we are allowed to have only one vision .... The one on the side of the camps was not good ect ect ... It's like for the post on racism .... You're white married to a white: you're a eugenist, ... you're white you're running after a black: you're a perverted racist colnialist who wants to subdue a woman of color ...

The number of advances in medicine which are to be attributed to the Fuhrer experimenter is impressive ... without them how we would have known that zyklon b was toxic to humans .... Today we would have real results on the glyphosate not bogus studies ...
0 x
The only thing safe in the future. It is that there may chance that it conforms to our expectations ...
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5125
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 514

Re: The CONS of Coronavirus




by Exnihiloest » 23/07/20, 18:48

Christophe wrote:... at the beginning, in the 30s, the deportations were also based on voluntary service (at least not forced by violence and lies of course) ... And that's why the rest of the population accepted so well. I am convinced that at the beginning millions of Germans thought that the deportees were in kind of holiday camps ...
...

Exactly like today when people think that respect for nature, even submission to nature, would make the earth a holiday camp. When we ask them not to take the plane or the car, not to eat meat or to limit the temperature in the houses in winter to 13 ° C, they will say amen as they said for containment.
The conditioning to get there is to scare, and it works. People, complacent, prefer a completely safe society rather than risk taking and what goes with it, individual responsibility. That the frightened sheep, gathered in their enclosure, are then the prey of the wolves, it is in the nature of things. To renounce his status as a free man and delegate his own responsibilities to institutions is to live by proxy, you must not come and complain afterwards.
0 x


 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 73 guests