France is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.

How to stay healthy and prevent risks and consequences on your health and public health. occupational disease, industrial risks (asbestos, air pollution, electromagnetic waves ...), company risk (workplace stress, overuse of drugs ...) and individual (tobacco, alcohol ...).
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: France is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.




by Janic » 17/12/18, 16:07



For those who are not content with AFIS fake news, pseudoscience and companies.
It wouldn't hurt them to follow the legal news that rehabilitated Smith and his colleagues, so to the detriment of all the lies told against him and his colleagues.
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: France is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.




by Janic » 19/12/18, 11:25

22 scientific studies show that vaccines can cause autism

therefore already in 2013, studies put n cause vaccines and autism.
By Arjun Walia, September 12, 2013



Concerns about vaccinations continue to increase exponentially in light of all the information and documentation that has emerged in the past few years. Consequently, the corporate media wanted to respond to the alternative media by declaring that the increase in the number of people who choose not to vaccinate or not to follow the vaccination calendar is the result of a tactic that aims to spread fear.



This is not too surprising given the fact that corporate media is owned by the major vaccine manufacturers, and that the major vaccine manufacturers are owned by corporate media. [1], [2], [3], [4]. Given this fact, it is easy to imagine the possibility that these institutions are desperately trying to protect the reputation of their products.



For example, GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer are owned by the same financial institutions and by groups that own Time Warner (CNN, HBO, etc.) and General Electric (NBC, Comcast, Universal Pictures, etc.) [1], [2] , [3], [4]. The situation can easily be seen through all the major vaccine manufacturers and the six companies that control the mainstream media. It should be borne in mind that these are the main donors of all the "medical research" that is used to justify the administration of drugs and vaccines. Despite all of these connections, medical research and literature that exists may show that vaccines may be a real cause for concern.



Vaccines and autism, the two sides of the coin



Here we want to present the two sides of the coin because many people are not even aware that there are two sides. For our part, we present numerous studies, we cite several research articles, we publish research carried out by doctors and universities around the world. - Vaccine manufacturers and medical "experts" with links to the drug industry have, for more than 30 years, been aware of the multiple dangers associated with vaccination. We also want to show that medical research has highlighted and made known the many dangers associated with vaccines on multiple occasions. We are making this publication because the safety of vaccines is regularly promoted by the mainstream media without them mentioning or citing the abundant medical research that should imperatively be taken into account when considering vaccinations. Please keep in mind that there is evidence on both sides. The evidence of those who cannot view vaccination in a positive light has been accused of fraud. But again, there are many who escape such clear-cut judgments.



The vaccine-autism debate has existed for years. In February 1998, Dr. Andrew Wakefield, a British gastroenterologist, published with colleagues a document that was supposed to link autism to vaccines [5]. Specifically, he claimed that the MMR vaccine was responsible for intestinal inflammation that leads to the translocation of peptides that do not enter the bloodstream and subsequently into the brain where they can affect development. [5] His work has not been published, and he has lost his medical license despite the fact that several studies appear to support his work. (see here and here)



Dr. Wakefield has been labeled a fraudster by the medical community. Some experts claim that his research and methods are weak and based on very little evidence. We have decided NOT to use Wakefield's research in this article.



I should point out that several studies around the world have concluded that there is no link between autism and the MMR vaccine. [5] The subject could easily be confused by the fact that many medical studies contradict each other. Would Dr. Wakefield have helped reveal things the medical industry wouldn't want you to know? We know that vaccine manufacturers hide data that is not favorable to their products, as illustrated in a previous article. Regardless of the MMR vaccine and the autism debate, there are a number of studies that establish a possible link between vaccines and autism. Please keep in mind that several courts around the world have ruled in favor of the fact that vaccines can cause autism, brain damage and other complications [6], [7], including including MMR vaccine.



Below, you can find a list of 22 medical studies that show possible connections between vaccines and autism. Please also keep in mind that in this article we have limited ourselves to 22 studies, while many other published articles document this link. We hope that this article can inspire you to continue your own research on the subject. It should also be borne in mind that autism is only one of the many consequences of the administration of vaccines which have been linked to a number of other diseases.



A study published in the Annals of Epidemiology journal

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21058170



A study published in the Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry

http://omsj.org/reports/tomljenovic%202011.pdf



A study published in the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21623535



A study published in the Journal of Toxicology

http://www.hindawi.com/journals/jt/2013/801517/



A study published in the Journal of Biomedical Sciences

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12145534



A study published in Annals of Clinical Psychiatry

Suggests that autism is probably triggered by a virus and that the measles virus (VR and / or MMR vaccine) may be an excellent candidate.



A study published in The american Journal of Clinical Nutrition

http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/80/6/1611.full



A study published by the Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences (Northeastern University, Boston)

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14745455



A study published in the Journal of Child Neurology

http://jcn.sagepub.com/content/22/11/1308.abstract



A study published in the Journal of Child Neurology

http://jcn.sagepub.com/content/21/2/170.abstract



A study by the Massachusetts General Hospital

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16151044



A study by the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Arkansas

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15527868



A study published by The Public Library of Science (PLOS)

http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Ad ... ne.0068444



A study by The University of Texas Health Science Center

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16338635



A study published in the International Journal of Toxicology

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12933322



Study published in The Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17454560



A study published by The US National Library of Medicine

http://civileats.com/wp-content/uploads ... er2008.pdf



A study by The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (University of Pittsburgh's School of Medicine)

http://www.ane.pl/pdf/7020.pdf



A study by The George Washington University school of Public Health

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18482737



A study published in the journal Cell Biology and Tocicology

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19357975



A study published in the journal Lab Medicine

http://labmed.ascpjournals.org/content/ ... 8.full.pdf



A study published in the journal Neurochemical Research

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article ... ool=pubmed



References:

[1] http://investors.morningstar.com/ownership/shareholders-major.html?t=GSK

[2] http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=twx+Major+Holders

[3] http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=ge+Major+Holders

[4] http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=pfe+Major+Holders

[5] http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/48/4/456.full

[6] http://www.ebcala.org/unanswered-questions

[7] http://www.collective-evolution.com/2013/07/07/courts-rule-mmr-thimerosal-containing-vaccines-caused-autism-brain-damage/

Arjun Walia writes for Collective-Evolution where this article first appeared. His contact email is as follows: arjun [at] collective-evolution.com



Another article published on Whale.to mentions 30 studies, not 22. Anyway, it is obvious that those who dare to tell you, on behalf of public authorities, that there is NO studies supporting this link between vaccines and autism, not only lie to you but also endanger the health and integrity of your children. Current Science is in reality prostitute (the word is absolutely not too strong) and it is in this context that it obviously chooses to "dub" as only valid the large official studies which are paid by the manufacturers and which systematically report the only interests that suit them!


AFIS could not ignore this fact and above all should know that a judgment from the highest legal authority in England had put an end to these fakenews that are so loved to broadcast on the internet, this kind of "sect".
To add to the list on the ROR and the CDC!
http://initiativecitoyenne.be/2018/12/v ... ation.html
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: France is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.




by Janic » 20/12/18, 09:56

carried over from the subject to permafrost

Fortunately a vaccine was quickly developed against Ebola. https://www.letemps.ch/sciences/cette-y ... irus-ebola and helped to stem the epidemic, no offense to Janic.

Unlike you, Janic reads ALL of the article, and what does it say? Clearly another publicity effect as it comes out regularly to attract subsidies.

This time, there is a vaccine against the Ebola virus
The rVSV-ZEBOV vaccine is expected to debut in the Ebola virus epidemic in the DRC. On condition, however, of overcoming the challenges linked to its transport and conservation in regions inaccessible by plane or car, often without electricity in the middle of the jungle
History repeats itself, and that of the Ebola virus is the perfect illustration. Since the discovery of the virus in 1976 in Zaire (...) scientific research has been undertaken to develop a vaccine but is ultimately abandoned for lack of resources. The ninth documented appearance of the virus, which has occurred in recent weeks in 39 suspected cases and which has already claimed the lives of 19 people, therefore seems deja-vu. Except that this time, notable difference, there is a vaccine! For the first time, the health agencies of the DRC could deploy a remedy, the rVSV-ZEBOV (or VSV-EBOV), initially developed by the Agence de la Public Health Canada, licensed by Merck Laboratories.
Read also: Ebola vaccine tested at HUG obtains good results in Guinea
Tested in several places in the world, notably at the Geneva University Hospitals (HUG), it had demonstrated its capacity to trigger, without danger, the production by the organism of antibodies directed against the Ebola virus during clinical trials of phases I and II, performed in healthy volunteers. [*]
Encouraging results (sic) which logically led to conducting phase III trials, on a larger scale and in people in contact with the virus. The rVSV-ZEBOV had then demonstrated an efficacy of around 75 to 100% in 7651 people according to the review The Lancet. Figures not obtained against placebo, for obvious ethical reasons, but during a so-called belt vaccination campaign, in which people who came into direct contact with a diagnosed patient, as well as their own contacts (i.e. two degrees of separation) were vaccinated. [*] [*]
Although there is every reason to believe this, we are not yet certain that this vaccine will also work in this situation
Laurent Kaiser, virologist
Another large clinical trial later in Guinea was conducted with 5837 people meeting these contact criteria and concludes with an 100% efficacy rate, with no case of Ebola occurring within 10 days the vaccination. In the process, a stock of 300 000 doses of rVSV-ZEBOV was set up in the event of a new outbreak thanks to the support of Gavi Alliance, a Geneva-based organization that works to provide access to the poorest countries fast to expensive treatments.
Despite the effectiveness and availability of the vaccine, caution is advised. "It remains to be confirmed whether these 39 cases are indeed Ebola cases," says Laurent Kaiser, virologist at HUG. There are many infectious diseases in the region that cause similar symptoms. And although the viruses of 2014 and 2018 belong to the same strain "Zaire", there is no guarantee for the moment the success of the vaccine. “In 2015, clinical trials took place during a single study in Guinea, at the end of the epidemic and therefore after the emergency. Although there is every reason to believe it, we are not yet sure that this vaccine will also work in this situation, "said the doctor.
Storage at -80 ° C
It is for this reason that rVSV-ZEBOV does not currently have any marketing authorization in the usual sense of the term. The World Health Organization (WHO) has developed an experimental protocol that has just been validated by the health authorities and ethics committees of the DRC, written in an email to Le Temps Tarik Jasarevic, spokesperson for the WHO. This green light will lead to a temporary authorization to market the rVSV-ZEBOV, for a so-called compassionate use. [*] [*] [*]


Example in Ikoko Ipenge, a village where two cases occurred on May 13, and which is only connected to Bikoro, where WHO installed a 15-bed care center and a mobile laboratory, only after a difficult journey by motorbike about thirty kilometers through the jungle. As for Bikoro Airport, it is too poorly maintained to use it. "This is going to be complicated and expensive," said Peter Salama, director of the WHO Emergency Management Program, at a press conference in Geneva on May 11.
Even if the logistics would be ideal and the vaccine ready in the field, the belt vaccination campaign is no easy task: epidemiologists, data specialists and other health personnel must document the progression of the epidemic , trace all the patient's contacts, at two degrees of separation, in the three weeks preceding the diagnosis. A delicate detective work essential to the success of such a vaccine strategy. "The vaccine can change the situation, but it will not be enough in itself: it takes a whole mobilization of communities and health personnel without forgetting to implement preventive actions", concludes Laurent Kaiser.

[*] any introduction of any product into an organism causes antibody production. Does the author of these articles ignore him?
Then on healthy carriers as if it was a demonstration of efficiency in patients.
[*] [*] history repeats history every time and it resembles, to be mistaken, the WHO report on smallpox which concludes that "despite some successes in some countries, it was a failure in general"
[*] [*] [*] There it reminds, the H1N1 with all the circus that accompanied him and the simulacrum of vaccination Bachelot.
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: France is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.




by Janic » 20/12/18, 10:01

December 6, 2014
Dr. Broussalian went to Africa to see what is happening with Ebola: his report is more than impressive!
The epidemic is on the decline but the Western media continue to amplify the situation while waiting for the vaccine to arrive ....
Everything is done to prevent doctors with methods other than vaccines and official antivirals from treating patients because it MUST absolutely continue to believe that the vaccine will be essential.
Homeopathy is quickly effective against various acute infectious diseases. Discover the suggestion of the homeopathic remedy which covers the symptoms of Ebola most widely and which could therefore prove to be very useful ...

A report to read urgently so as not to continue to swallow all the official sales pitch!

[…] I could see firsthand that there was not a single new patient admitted, which clearly indicated that the epidemic was already in full decline and that the media were only amplifying and maintaining a wind of panic. Being myself a simple mortal, I have no idea what is going on behind this but it is clearly suspect. If I had actions in companies producing vaccines I would be very sad to see the end of an epidemic for example. The epidemic situation could also greatly settle certain people who “receive” important subsidies: I prefer not to think back to the filthy mismanagement that I witnessed in Haiti. In sum, the panic skillfully maintained in the media could create a fear that would push to consume the vaccine. As usual classical medicine, i.e. industry, often does nothing but deal with the fear that she knows how to orchestrate herself so well.[…] " Read more.
and so:

To all those who tell me that it takes courage to approach Ebola patients I answer this sentence from Shakespeare that every doctor should meditate:

Visible dangers scare us less than our imaginary terrors.

Finally, to the cowards who have never approached the sick at all, who have never left the cozy comfort of their office, but who allow themselves to vomit their instinctive hatred, it remains for me to say to them:
Sutor, nec supra crepidam!
ne sutor, supra crepidam. - (Pliny the Elder, 35,85.)
That the shoemaker does not judge above the crepid - To each his job.




Dr Edouard Broussalian, Planet Homéo
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: France is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.




by Janic » 20/12/18, 15:07

after the indication of the video on the alutotal, here is a comment from its author Hypatia
It's Alu Total!

Response to Jean-François Cliche: Vaccines, the big bad aluminum
Hello Mr. Cliche,

It is with great interest that I read your article criticizing the video I published on youtube, about the dangers of aluminum: Alu Total.

Will you give me a right of reply?

In the meantime, here is my review of your article. It will take you a little time to read everything, and a bit of work to check everything, but you get paid for it, right? Unlike me ... Are you going to read this email to the end? I wonder

So let's go !

First of all, let us clarify: " aluminum "is not synonymous with" vaccination ", But it's synonymous with" maximum profit For the industry. There are safer, and probably less profitable, alternatives. My goal is to make vaccination safer, and no one can blame me for that. (Manufacturers have had no legal responsibility since 1986, they have no interest in making vaccination safer, especially if journalists like you defend it without any critical spirit).

I see that you immediately quote the Jefferson 2004 study, which I myself quote in the video (at 01: 25: 58 and in the sources) to laugh about it nicely, because not only does this meta-analysis relate to a very small number of studies (only 5), on a single vaccine (DTP containing aluminum) and on only a few specific local side effects, without great danger, and in the short term (study time ranging from 24 to 6 weeks after the injection).
In addition, here is what concludes the synthesis of the study

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK70400/

"The overall study quality was described as low, reporting was poor, and there was limited information on how specific adverse events were defined or variability in definition". (translation: "the general quality of the study is low, monitoring is poor, and there was only limited information on how the side effects were defined, or variations in their definition" ...) It is not really a guarantee of quality ...

But the funniest is obviously his very famous conclusion: “Despite a lack of good-quality evidence we do not recommend that any further research on this topic is undertaken”.

In other words : we don't have solid evidence, but we don't recommend continuing to study the safety of aluminum vaccines. Admit that it's funny, especially since we are in 2004 and therefore the functioning of this adjuvant as well as its precise pharmacokinetics are still unknown! While aluminum is injected into almost all human beings who are born on Earth ...
I assure you that if, for you, as for our dear Paul Offit, Jefferson's analysis is valid, you should warn the WHO and the CDC, because they only display Mitkus to guarantee the safety of adjuvants. aluminum. And since you haven't seen the video, I'm going to spoil the suspense: the FDA, which produced Mitkus, has archived the study and is careful not to mention it on its extremely short page, devoted to vaccine adjuvants:

https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/201 ... 284520.htm
Note the mention "this web page may be out of date" above the text 

So I say it, and any sensible person would come to the same conclusion: there are no studies today that guarantee the safety of aluminum injected in infants. ANY : isn't that a reason for questioning for you, scientific journalist?

Obviously, you haven't seen my film: I spent 18 months compiling all the studies, doing this monk work as you say, precisely because no journalist is involved in it. But we, parents, we need to know, it is urgent: it is not a theoretical question, but rather the life of our children!

I am Mrs. Everyone, I took this time, obviously unpaid. I contacted the specialist scientists one by one to be sure I understood correctly ... and it took me a long time.

But let's continue. Since you did not take the time to watch my video, I will have to detail some concepts that you omit in your article, and which are however fundamental. All the sources are accessible, and the links are in the document under my video, because obviously, I say nothing without proof, otherwise what would it be for?

https://alutotal.wordpress.com/

Even though aluminum (Al3 +) is present "naturally" (or rather, since the industrial pollution which introduced it into our environment), it is largely stopped by the barriers of the organism, what not? EFSA (in Europe) concludes, for example, that only 0,1% of the aluminum present in food, in soluble form, enters the body permanently (1% in babies).

However, during an intramuscular injection, it is 100% of the aluminum of the vaccine (form of fine particles) which is introduced into the body, without the filter of natural barriers. It makes a huge difference, especially since the adjuvants are captured by the macrophages and remain in particulate form, migrating almost everywhere in the body, up to the brain. I recently noticed this new argument from your community of thought, which basically says "there is no aluminum in aluminum admixtures", or, in any case, that admixtures are not toxic…

I wonder how a Cartesian mind can say such enormity. When I spoke to Pr Christopher Exley (the world specialist in aluminum, who has been working on the subject for 35 years) he replied laconically: " they read this to understand ". I put you the link: https://aacijournal.biomedcentral.com/t ... 018-0305-2

As it is concise (and complex), I will summarize.

Aluminum, in all its forms, is absolutely incompatible with life, and therefore extremely toxic. In particular the Al3 + ion (and that is no longer a secret for anyone, the literature is full of studies on the subject). Aluminum salts are no less toxic: that's why they have a strong adjuvant property. They cause the immune response.

Aluminum is still considered a foreign body: it is Impossible to be incorporated into living metabolism (unlike iron or zinc…) The body will always try to eliminate it, especially if it is in the form of fine particles, while the ion Al3 + goes under the cracks (the macrophages) and will be stored almost everywhere in the body, in the tissues, and also in the brain (with a strong affinity for the myelin of the nerves): Al3 + has the property of also attacking the Blood-Brain Barrier, I refer you for example to "the dementia of dialysis patients ”(15:36).

The amount of aluminum (Al3 +) is clearly specified on the leaflets: for example, 0,82 mg of Al3 + per 0,5 mL in the Infanrix Hexa from GSK.

The Al3 + ion and aluminum salts are very pro-inflammatory. That is why they are used as adjuvants. You understand better why your remark "Aluminum adjuvants are never metallic aluminum, but molecules comprising one or more atoms of Al, like aluminum hydroxide, Al (OH) 3, which is not besides not rare in nature ”is completely erroneous, it is even dramatic to affirm such a thing. How did you come to this conclusion? This is what I would like to know.

Finally you refer to our dear Academy of Medicine and its famous report of 2012 which is also very amusing: you compare the pharmacokinetics of particulate aluminum injected intramuscularly, to the pharmacokinetics of soluble aluminum injected intravenously: you see Where is the problem ? These two forms are not comparable, nor do they have the same route of administration. They therefore do not have the same pharmacokinetics. An adjuvant study must necessarily involve injecting this adjuvant into living muscle. No choice, if we want to respect a scientific protocol "based on the facts".

In addition, the Academy of Medicine cites the only study available (at the time) on the pharmacokinetics of aluminum adjuvants: Flarend 1997 which I speak at length in my video (11:40), and which observes an extremely slow elimination aluminum (5,6% for aluminum hydroxide). The study also observes a cerebral penetration of aluminum: and yet, the study lasted only one month (it is very short to observe the migration of aluminum). No other official study will be carried out under these conditions: only the Khan study in 2013, in France, will reproduce this experience (study financed by our taxes ) on mice, finally allowing, after 86 years, to know the pharmacokinetics of aluminum additives. For elimination, Flarend remains the benchmark ... so there is still work and studies to produce!

It's interesting that you are talking about safety thresholds because, if we take the study of Mitkus and its curves based on the absorption rates observed by Flarend (very bad study which was archived by the FDA as I told you said it… and to know why, I would have had to look at my argument 3 at 32:34): the curves of each adjuvant are below the American safety levels (ATSDR: 1mg / kg / d) but exceed the safety levels European (EFSA: 1mg / kg / week). Especially since Mitkus is very careful to separate the hydroxide from the aluminum phosphate, while the 2 are injected the same day in infants (at least in the French calendar, but this must also be the case in North America) .

This is extremely serious: it means that the doses of aluminum received by American and French infants (and probably also Canadian) are officially toxic during the first year of life. (EFSA is based on recent studies, unlike ATSDR). This body charge of a neurotoxicant, which has been shown to enter the brain via macrophages (attracted by attractive molecules CCL2 / MCP1), within a tiny infant organism which is in full development neurological… it's unacceptable and extremely dangerous!

(see the studies cited as references in my sources, including Flarend 1997, Khan 2013, Crépeaux 2017, Mold 2017 and 2018…)

What parent would rationally accept to inject this neurotoxic if he had access to scientific studies, funded, I remind you by OUR taxes (in France)? I contacted these researchers, they are delighted to answer questions, even the most pointed.

In your newspaper, there are regular articles on the deplorable state of health of the young generations, their neurological disorders, autoimmune disorders ... Our children are not in good health. Treating the cause should be taken much more seriously! There is always a cause, you have to look for it instead of saying "it's natural". When we have witnessed the explosion of neurodevelopmental disorders for 30 years, it is our duty to look for probable and biologically plausible causes, don't you think?

https://www.lesoleil.com/actualite/sant ... ca6a6d23f4

This is the case of aluminum injected at a critical age for neurological development: biological plausibility has been demonstrated, the precautionary principle must be applied.

Our leaders now invoke "natural" or even only "genetics" to talk about autism, this amounts to saying as in the past "it is the divine will: we can do nothing about it". It is not rational. It is especially unacceptable.

You spent half a day on the subject, I spent 18 months there, working every day: I read all the studies I found on the subject of the safety and pharmacokinetics of aluminum adjuvants , I contacted each scientist to be sure I understood correctly. I went through every official document, every report. You only watch my introduction, and then you write things scientifically false on a subject you do not master, on a subject of unprecedented gravity, which affects all infants in the world…

I am a mom. I am rational. I practice the scientific approach. I always had my vaccines without asking myself any questions: but when my child was born, I told myself that I couldn't afford not to know anymore. And when I started looking, I found everything online: reports, studies, data. Everything is here. And yes, it took me 18 months because when you start to study the subject of the safety of aluminum admixtures, you fall into a bottomless pit, a pit of blackness that I never imagined. I've been carrying this project on my (small) shoulders for all this time, despite my full-time job and my young child.

Because I said to myself, just like you quite rightly: the public does not have time to study the question. Parents, even pediatricians do not have the information. Studies fail to be relayed. Why has no journalist done this work ? Are you really neutral? Free from conflicts of interest? Lacking cognitive dissonance? I don't get paid ... so I'm free. If I spent so much time there, it is so that all parents can have access to the documents (all accessible in my sources), that we can judge scientifically, rationally.

I repeat: aluminum is not essential for vaccination: the Pasteur Institute has even created a replacement, calcium phosphate (biocompatible constituent), used between 74 and 86, then abandoned only for a history of financial profitability (merger with Mérieux).

The offensive and English-speaking terms that you use to describe my work do you no honor: you trample on my video without having taken the time to watch it, which is however a minimum. Would you, perhaps, be unconsciously afraid of what you could learn ? I assure you that there is something to be afraid of. But there is also reason to have hope!

It's your job to educate people, not mine. It is up to you to do this monk work, but you feel that it is not necessary? Personally, I took time off in my free time: I am now qualified to speak on this subject of extreme importance for global public health. Not you. Not yet. You are convinced that you are right: it is perhaps the worst for a scientific mind, do not doubt. Doubt is the basis of the scientific approach. Because you see, my goal is precisely to raise the level of global requirements: we must become much more demanding, much more documented, much more intelligent. We must not trust blindly, like the believers of a sect.

I am a mother concerned by vaccination, it is the neurological future of my child that is at stake: I have too many friends whose children are autistic today, or physically disabled, nonverbal, asthmatic or allergic … I'm sure you have some too, in your entourage. We must act.

We must stop injecting a neurotoxic into the developing body of the infant: this act is barbaric, obsolete, as much as asbestos in the walls, lead pipes, cigarettes and alcohol during pregnancy, or mercury fillings.

Talking about this subject with such flippancy, I find it frightening, and frightening.

Finally you end on pharmacovigilance (see 47:51), a vast subject… unfortunately.

Then, when you quote at the end of your article, the Petrovsky study, which I quote myself, to say that "apart from rare side effects, they are harmless" is frankly questionable. Yes Petrovsky says that aluminum is safe ... it is unfortunately a must to have the right to study aluminum. But the (non-exhaustive) list that he makes of all the side effects, and not the least ... is absolutely nothing reassuring. Especially since studies have multiplied in recent years, providing a more precise vision of this absolutely central subject for public health (see my sources, again).

There is, however, one thing I am convinced of: you are a good person, and even if you despise me, you want to work for the common good. Me too. So I'm making you an offer: watch my video and let's discuss it together. I don't want to be right, I "think" to be right, until proven otherwise. Besides, my conclusion is clear: aluminum in all these forms is very dangerous for infants (not only in vaccines).

I'm open, I therefore ask you: "prove to me that I am wrong". But with real arguments, searched, documented. Yes, it takes time, but the stake is absolutely considerable. And I hope that one day, you will have this immense courage to reach out to me, to inform the public and to say to manufacturers: stop using aluminum as an adjuvant, there are safer alternatives (and ultimately more "profitable" for the community).

Help us, the public, you who are a journalist. Put your beliefs aside and watch what science says, head on, courageously (you need a bundle). And you will see, like me, the horror of this absolutely unimaginable imposture.

But quite frankly, I realize that you have a career, so you are bound together.

...

...

You are still here ? Or did I lose you?

Sincerely,

Hypatia

PS: it's still a pleasure that you are from Quebec, I dream of visiting your country for a long time!



Response from Mr. Cliche, 2 hours later:

This is interesting. In your introduction, you state that “only one study guarantees the safety of aluminum adjuvants. And it's. All. There is only one". Now you are telling me that you have read Jefferson (2004), who cites some forty works on this issue, and that you cite it. Do you know what it is called to consciously spread falsehoods? It is a shameless lie.

Good luck.
Dear Mr. Cliche,
Jefferson's study DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE SAFETY OF ALUMINUM ADJUVANTS. It is not cited by any health agency, because it is very very bad (and does not specifically relate to aluminum adjuvants, by the way).
Where is the shameless lie?
Kisses!
Heck, I thought Quebecers were nice people…

OFFICIAL SITES RELATING TO ALUMINUM ADJUVANTS

USA:

WHO: http://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/commi ... n_2012/fr/
CDC: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/conce ... vants.html
FDA: note that the FDA no longer cites any studies on aluminum (and especially not Mitkus 2011) https://www.fda.gov/biologicsbloodvacci ... 187810.htm
Oxford Vaccine Group: http://vk.ovg.ox.ac.uk/vaccine-ingredients
Children Hospital of Philadelphia (by Paul Offit): https://www.chop.edu/centers-programs/v ... s/aluminum
American Academy of Pediatrics: https://www.healthychildren.org/English ... dence.aspx
La France :

Vaccination-info-service.fr: Is aluminum from vaccines dangerous?
https://vaccination-info-service.fr/Que ... -dangereux

ANSM: "aluminum-containing vaccines are safe"
https://www.ansm.sante.fr/S-informer/Co ... Communique

HANDLES: https://www.anses.fr/fr/content/exposition-à-lAluminum-by-the food


OFFICIAL ALUMINUM REPORTS

Academy of Medicine: "Vaccine adjuvants: what news in 2012? "
http://www.academie-medecine.fr/wp-cont ... t-ANM1.pdf

High Council of Public Health: "Aluminum and Vaccines"
https://www.hcsp.fr/Explore.cgi/hcspr20 ... accins.pdf

National Academy of Pharmacy: "aluminum adjuvants: the point in 2016"
http://www.acadpharm.org/dos_public/Rap ... CORR_5.pdf

Workshop on Aluminum in vaccines. Puerto Rico 11-12 May 2000, p.40 (Adjuvants are useless in reminders: but manufacturers leave them because it is more practical to produce only one formula.)
https://www.autismhelpforyou.com/AL%20-%201.pdf

https://www.autismhelpforyou.com/AL%20-%202.pdf

Worshop on non-clinical Safety evaluation of preventive vaccines, 2002, p.220 (statement by Nathalie Garçon “if aluminum arrived on the market today, it would not be accepted”)
http://aitia.fr/erd/wp-content/uploads/ ... -p.220.pdf

EMA guidelines on vaccine adjuvants: (2004 and 2005):
2004 version: https://www.ema.europa.eu/documents/sci ... nes_en.pdf

final version: https://www.ema.europa.eu/documents/sci ... ote_en.pdf

ANSM: Aluminum in cosmetics (2011)
https://ansm.sante.fr/content/download/ ... s-2011.pdf

ex-AFSSA: Aluminum in food (2008)
https://www.anses.fr/fr/system/files/RCCP2008sa0196.pdf

Weekly admissible dose of aluminum fixed by EFSA (p.29)
https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/do ... a.2008.754

Gulf War Syndrom Soldiers Report, 2008 (p.119-120)
https://www.va.gov/rac-gwvi/docs/Commit ... t_2008.pdf



VACCINE SAFETY REPORTS

IOM Report (2012 - Institute of Medicine): Adverse Effects of vaccines: evidence and causality

https://www.nap.edu/read/13164/chapter/1

quoted by the CDC: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/autism.html

This IOM Report explicitly states that for 135 serious side effects (including autism, linked to DTP, p.546), it is impossible to conclude or exclude a link with vaccination: it is therefore impossible to affirm that there is no link between autism and vaccination.

ETC ...


DECLARATION OF INTERESTS

I declare that I have received absolutely no funding for the production of this video which is not monetized (Creative Commons). I am not in contact with industry or with patient associations.


NB: I deleted all the rest of the links that everyone can consult on the Hipatie website, but here it cannot exceed 30 links
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: France is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.




by Exnihiloest » 20/12/18, 18:37

Heard this morning on the radio: the flu vaccination was very popular this year. Like what people can still resist the misinformation anti-vaccine activists, this is the good news of the day.
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: France is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.




by Janic » 20/12/18, 19:41

by Exnihiloest »20/12/18, 19:37 PM

Heard this morning on the radio: the flu vaccination was very popular this year. Like what people can still resist the misinformation anti-vaccine activists, this is the good news of the day.
Weird, even the internet and public health (official organ are silent on this request, but where are they going to look for all that ?!
So more asked it means nothing without being encrypted and below are figures.

While public health targets are set at 75% for the population at risk, seasonal flu vaccine coverage remains below 50% (46% as of December 31, 2016)
Vaccination is recommended for people at risk complications (people aged 65 and over, people (adults and children) with certain chronic diseases, pregnant women, obese people) and those who are in contact with them.
so not the others !!!!
https://www.santemagazine.fr/actualites ... ies-302374
1. 2016 Review of the Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Campaign: Less Than One
person in two for which flu poses a risk is vaccinated ................. 4
a) 47,4% vaccination coverage slightly down (-0,9 point) compared to 2015

https://solidarites-sante.gouv.fr/IMG/p ... _0410_.pdf

VAXIGRIP
Laboratory: Sanofi Pasteur
Last update: September 23, 2018 12:26:09

This vaccine is no longer sold in France since the end of January 2018.
https://www.mesvaccins.net/web/vaccines/62-vaxigrip
ETC ...
Like what people can still resist the disinformation of anti-vaccine activists, this is the good news of the day.
the sweet dreamer, you need it! : Cheesy:
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: France is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.




by Janic » 20/12/18, 20:09

re-moving to this topic:

Warming up: Permafrost Disease is coming ...
Message by izentrop »20/12/18, 01:03
Fortunately a vaccine was quickly developed against Ebola. https://www.letemps.ch/sciences/cette-y ... irus-ebola and helped to stem the epidemic, no offense to Janic.

Exnihiloest »20/12/18, 20:16
Janic wrote:
Fortunately a vaccine was quickly developed against Ebola. https://www.letemps.ch/sciences/cette-y ... irus-ebola and helped to stem the epidemic, no offense to Janic.

... Unlike you, Janic reads ALL the article, him, ...


and draws only what suits him, in an illegible flooding (it is also positive, I wonder who will read this jumble).

After difficulties of development, the last vaccine against ebola is a success because remember, it is a person in two who without vaccine dies ebola.
"The rVSV-ZEBOV had then demonstrated an effectiveness of the order of 75 to 100% in 7651 people according to the journal The Lancet."


janic »20 / 12 / 18, 21: 01
... Unlike you, Janic reads ALL the article, him, ...

and draws only what suits him, in an illegible flooding (it is also positive, I wonder who will read this jumble).

Obviously not you, it still requires a sufficient analytical mind!
After difficulties of development, the last vaccine against ebola is a success because remember, it is a person in two who without vaccine dies ebola.
"The rVSV-ZEBOV had then demonstrated an effectiveness of the order of 75 to 100% in 7651 people according to the journal The Lancet."

The same rhetoric was held for each new vaccine. The smallpox vaccine was also considered "effective" and this was a health disaster. It's beautiful blind faith!
the Lancet also publishes articles, it is not a body of control and verification of the articles that it publishes under the responsibility of their authors as it published the article of Wakefield and Smith and their team. English court validated by condemning the College of Physicians)
So read ALL that is stressed, if you have trouble reading everything!
Although everything leads to believe it, we are not sure yet that this vaccine will also work in this situation
Laurent Kaiser, virologist
It remains to be confirmed if these 39 cases are indeed Ebola cases, ”says Laurent Kaiser, virologist at HUG. There are many infectious diseases in the region causing similar symptoms
. Hold on like AIDS!
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: France is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.




by Janic » 22/12/18, 16:32

All new, all hot! The warning from cancer specialists and husband Delepine on the staggering increase in uterine cancer after Gardasil vaccine, up to more than 100% according to recent statistics from vaccinated countries.



December 20, 2018
Gardasil: the vaccine hysteria summarized by two oncologists
Does the vaccine theory, always profitable for the same, stick to the FACTS: is this HPV vaccination effective? NO, and even worse, it is counterproductive and contributes to increasing the risks of invasive cervical cancer (if we add to that the dramatic side effects of this vaccine, there is no need for any other introduction to the following interview ...). Attention, young vaccinated girls having an increased risk of developing cervical cancer in the 5 to 10 years following their vaccination, they really have to make regular enough smears ...




See as well:
French law proposal to add the HPV Gardasil vaccine to the list of 11 vaccines already mandatory

Toulouse: Gérard Bapt advises young girls not to be vaccinated against papillomavirus

MR, Ecolo and Défi, to broaden vaccination against papillomaviruses

No to the widening of HPV vaccination (in school medicine in particular): our young people in danger with the proposal of Mr. Brotchi!

Post-vaccine calvary

Gardasil: this vaccine put my daughter through hell, I will fight to the end

http://initiativecitoyenne.be/
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: France is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.




by Exnihiloest » 22/12/18, 19:20

Still heard today: flu vaccination has been in high demand this year. As it is confirmed that people still know how to resist the misinformation of anti-vaccine activists.
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 210 guests