Health and prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental hazardsFrance is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.

How to stay healthy and prevent risks and consequences on your health and public health. occupational disease, industrial risks (asbestos, air pollution, electromagnetic waves ...), company risk (workplace stress, overuse of drugs ...) and individual (tobacco, alcohol ...).
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6810
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: Burgundy
x 114

Re: France is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.

Unread Messageby Janic » 17/12/18, 16:07



For those who are not content with fake news from AFIS, pseudoscience and companies.
It would not hurt them to follow the judicial news that rehabilitated Smith and his colleagues, to the detriment of all the lies made against him and his colleagues.
0 x
"We do science with facts, as is a house with stones, but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a heap of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" Exnihiloest

Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6810
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: Burgundy
x 114

Re: France is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.

Unread Messageby Janic » 19/12/18, 11:25

22 scientific studies show that vaccines can cause autism

so already in 2013, studies put n cause vaccines and autism.
By Arjun Walia, 12 September 2013



Concerns about vaccinations continue to grow exponentially in the light of all the information and documentation that has emerged over the past few years. As a result, the corporate media wanted to respond to alternative media by stating that the increase in the number of people who choose not to vaccinate or not to follow the vaccination schedule is the result of a tactic that aims to spread fear.



This is not too surprising given the fact that corporate media are owned by leading vaccine manufacturers, and that major vaccine manufacturers are owned by corporate media. [1], [2], [3], [4]. Given this fact, it is easy to imagine the possibility that these institutions are desperately trying to protect the reputation of their products.



For example, GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer are owned by the same financial institutions and by the groups that own Time Warner (CNN, HBO, etc.) and General Electric (NBC, Comcast, Universal Pictures, etc.) [1], [2] , [3], [4]. One can easily see the situation through all major vaccine manufacturers and the six companies that control traditional media. It should be borne in mind that these are the main funders of all "medical research" that is used to justify the administration of drugs and vaccines. Despite all these connections, existing medical research and documentation may show that vaccines may be a real cause for concern.



Vaccines and autism, both sides of the coin



We want to present both sides of the coin because there are many people who do not even know there are two sides. For our part, we present numerous studies, we cite several research articles, we publish research conducted by doctors and universities around the world. - Vaccine manufacturers and medical "experts" with links to the drug industry have, for more than 30 years, been aware of the many dangers of vaccination. We also want to show that medical research has highlighted the many dangers associated with vaccines and has made it known on many occasions. We make this publication because the safety of vaccines is regularly highlighted by the traditional media without these mention or cite the abundant medical research that should imperatively be taken into consideration during the examination of vaccinations. Please keep in mind that there is evidence on both sides. The evidence of those who can not consider vaccination in a positive perspective has been labeled as fraudulent. But again, there are many who escape such sharp judgments.



The vaccine-autism debate has been around for years. In February 1998, Dr. Andrew Wakefield, a British gastroenterologist published with colleagues a paper that was supposed to link autism to vaccines [5]. Specifically, he claimed that the MMR vaccine was responsible for intestinal inflammation that leads to the translocation of peptides that do not enter the bloodstream and subsequently into the brain where they can affect development. [5] His work has not been published, and he lost his medical license despite the fact that several studies seem to support his work. (see here and here)



Dr. Wakefield has been labeled a fraudster by the medical world. Some experts claim that his research and methods are weak and based on very little evidence. We decided NOT to use Wakefield's research in this article.



I must point out that several studies around the world have concluded that there is no link between autism and the MMR vaccine. [5] The subject could easily be confused by the fact that many medical studies contradict one another. Would Dr. Wakefield have helped to reveal things that the medical industry would not want you to know? Vaccine manufacturers are known to conceal data that is not favorable to their products, as illustrated in a previous article. Regardless of the MMR vaccine and the autism debate, there are a number of studies that establish a possible link between vaccines and autism. Please keep in mind that many courts around the world have decided that vaccines are likely to cause autism, brain damage and other complications [6], [7], including including the MMR vaccine.



Below you will find a list of 22 medical studies that show possible connections between vaccines and autism. Please also bear in mind that in this article we have limited ourselves to 22 studies, while many other published articles document this link. We hope that this article will inspire you to pursue your own research on the subject. It should also be borne in mind that autism is only one of the many consequences of administering vaccines that have been linked to a number of other diseases.



A study published in the journal Annals of Epidemiology

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21058170



A study published in the Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry

http://omsj.org/reports/tomljenovic%202011.pdf



A study published in the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21623535



A study published in the Journal of Toxicology

http://www.hindawi.com/journals/jt/2013/801517/



A study published in the Journal of Biomedical Sciences

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12145534



A study published in Annals of Clinical Psychiatry

Suggests that autism is probably triggered by a virus and that the measles virus (VR and / or MMR Vaccine) could be an excellent candidate.



A study published in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/80/6/1611.full



A study published by the Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences (Northeastern University, Boston)

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14745455



A study published in the Journal of Child Neurology

http://jcn.sagepub.com/content/22/11/1308.abstract



A study published in the Journal of Child Neurology

http://jcn.sagepub.com/content/21/2/170.abstract



A study by Massachusetts General Hospital

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16151044



A study conducted by the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Arkansas

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15527868



A study published by The Public Library of Science (PLOS)

http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Ad ... ne.0068444



A study by The University of Texas Health Science Center

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16338635



A study published in the International Journal of Toxicology

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12933322



A study published in The Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17454560



A study published by The US National Library of Medicine

http://civileats.com/wp-content/uploads ... er2008.pdf



A study by The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (University of Pittsburgh's School of Medicine)

http://www.ane.pl/pdf/7020.pdf



A study by The George Washington University School of Public Health

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18482737



A study published in the journalCell Biology and Tocicology

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19357975



A study published in the journal Lab Medicine

http://labmed.ascpjournals.org/content/ ... 8.full.pdf



A study published in the journal Neurochemical Research

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article ... ool=pubmed



References:

[1] http://investors.morningstar.com/ownership/shareholders-major.html?t=GSK

[2] http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=twx+Major+Holders

[3] http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=ge+Major+Holders

[4] http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=pfe+Major+Holders

[5] http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/48/4/456.full

[6] http://www.ebcala.org/unanswered-questions

[7] http://www.collective-evolution.com/2013/07/07/courts-rule-mmr-thimerosal-containing-vaccines-caused-autism-brain-damage/

Arjun Walia writes for Collective-Evolution where this article first appeared. His email address is: arjun [at] collective-evolution.com



Another article published on Whale.to mentions 30 studies and not 22. Anyway, it is obvious that those who dare to tell you, on behalf of the public authorities, that there is NO study supporting this connection between vaccines and autism, not only lie to you but also endanger the health and the integrity of your children. The current Science is actually prostituted (the word is absolutely not too strong) and it is in this context that it chooses obviously to "adouber" as the only valid large official studies that are paid by the manufacturers and which systematically state the only interests that arrange them!


AFIS could not ignore this fact and especially should know that a judgment from the highest legal authority in England had ended the fakenews that loves so much to disseminate on the internet, this kind of "sect".
To add to the list on the ROR and the CDC!
http://initiativecitoyenne.be/2018/12/v ... ation.html
0 x
"We do science with facts, as is a house with stones, but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a heap of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" Exnihiloest
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6810
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: Burgundy
x 114

Re: France is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.

Unread Messageby Janic » 20/12/18, 09:56

postponed the topic on permafrost

Fortunately a vaccine was quickly developed against Ebola. https://www.letemps.ch/sciences/cette-y ... irus-ebola and allowed to wreck the epidemic, no offense to Janic.

Unlike you, Janic reads ALL the article, what does it say? Clearly another announcement effect as it comes out regularly to attract subsidies.

This time there is a vaccine against the Ebola virus
The rVSV-ZEBOV vaccine is expected to debut in the Ebola epidemic in the DRC. Provided, however, to overcome the challenges related to its transport and its conservation in inaccessible regions by plane or by car, often without electricity in the middle of the jungle
History is repeating itself, and that of the Ebola virus is the perfect illustration. Since the discovery of the virus in 1976 Zaire (...) scientific research is undertaken to develop a vaccine but are finally abandoned for lack of resources. The ninth documented occurrence of the virus, which has occurred in recent weeks with 39 suspected cases and has already killed 19 people, has an air of déjà-vu. Except that this time, a notable difference, there is a vaccine.! For the first time, the health agencies of the DRC could deploy a cure, the rVSV-ZEBOV (or VSV-EBOV), initially developed by the Agency of the Public Health of Canada and licensed by Merck Laboratories.
Read also: Ebola vaccine tested at HUG obtains good results in Guinea
Tested in several locations around the world, including the University Hospitals of Geneva (HUG), it demonstrated its ability to safely trigger the body's production of antibodies against the Ebola virus in phase clinical trials. I and II, in healthy volunteers. [*]
Encouraging results (sic) that had logically led to conducting phase III trials, on a larger scale and in people in contact with the virus. The rVSV-ZEBOV had then demonstrated an efficiency of the order of 75 100% in 7651 people according to The Lancet. Figures not obtained against placebo, for obvious ethical reasons, but during a so-called belt vaccination campaign, in which people came in direct contact with a diagnosed patient, as well as their own contacts (ie two degrees of separation) were vaccinated. [*] [*]
Although everything leads to believe, we are not yet sure that this vaccine will work in this situation
Laurent Kaiser, virologist
Another large clinical trial later in Guinea was conducted with 5837 people meeting these contact criteria and concludes with an 100% efficacy rate, with no case of Ebola occurring within 10 days the vaccination. In the process, a stock of 300 000 doses of rVSV-ZEBOV was set up in the event of a new outbreak thanks to the support of Gavi Alliance, a Geneva-based organization working to provide access to the poorest countries fast to expensive treatments.
Despite the effectiveness and availability of the vaccine, caution remains. "It remains to be confirmed whether these 39 cases are indeed cases of Ebola," says Laurent Kaiser, a virologist at HUG. There are many infectious diseases in the region with similar symptoms. And although the viruses of 2014 and 2018 belong to the same strain "Zaire", nothing guarantees for the moment the success of the vaccine. "In 2015, the clinical trials took place in a single study in Guinea, at the end of the epidemic and therefore after the emergency. Although everything leads us to believe, we are not yet sure that this vaccine will work in this situation, "says the doctor.
Storage at -80 ° C
For this reason, the rVSV-ZEBOV does not currently have any marketing authorization in the usual sense of the term. The World Health Organization (WHO) has developed an experimental protocol that has been validated by the health authorities and the ethics committees of the DRC, writes in an email to Time Tarik Jasarevic, spokesperson for the WHO. This green light will lead to a temporary authorization to place rVSV-ZEBOV on the market for a so-called compassionate use. [*] [*] [*]


Example at Ikoko Ipenge, a village where two cases occurred on May 13, and which is not connected to Bikoro, where the WHO has installed an 15 beds care center and a mobile laboratory, only after a difficult trip by motorcycle of about thirty kilometers through the jungle. As for the Bikoro airport, it is too poorly maintained to use it. "It's going to be complicated and expensive," said Peter Salama, the director of the WHO's Emergency Management Program, at a press conference in Geneva on May 11.
Even though logistics would be ideal and the vaccine ready in the field, the belt vaccination campaign is no sinecure: epidemiologists, data specialists and other health personnel must document the progress of the epidemic , trace all contacts of the patient, at two degrees of separation, in the three weeks preceding the diagnosis. A delicate detective work essential to the success of such a vaccination strategy. "The vaccine can change the game, but it will not be enough by itself: it requires a mobilization of communities and health personnel without forgetting to implement preventive actions," concludes Laurent Kaiser.

[*] any introduction of any product into an organism causes antibody production. Does the author of these articles ignore him?
Then on healthy carriers as if it was a demonstration of efficiency in patients.
[*] [*] history repeats the story every time, and it looks like the WHO report on smallpox, which concludes that "despite some successes in some countries, it was a failure in general"
[*] [*] [*] There it reminds, the H1N1 with all the circus that accompanied him and the simulacrum of vaccination Bachelot.
0 x
"We do science with facts, as is a house with stones, but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a heap of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" Exnihiloest
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6810
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: Burgundy
x 114

Re: France is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.

Unread Messageby Janic » 20/12/18, 10:01

December 6 2014
Dr. Broussalian went to Africa to see what happens with Ebola: his report is more than challenging!
The epidemic is on the decline but the Western media continue to amplify the situation until the vaccine arrives ....
Every effort is made to prevent doctors with methods other than official vaccines and antivirals from treating patients because it is important to continue to believe that the vaccine will be unavoidable.
Homeopathy is quickly effective against a variety of acute infectious diseases. Discover the suggestion of the homeopathic remedy that covers the most widely the symptoms of Ebola and that could prove very useful ...

A report to read urgently not to continue to swallow all the official pitch!

[...] I could see from the outset that there was not a single new patient admitted, which indicated that the epidemic was already in decline and that the media was only amplifying and maintaining a wind of panic. Being myself a mere mortal, I have no idea what is behind this but it is clearly suspect. If I had actions in companies producing vaccines I would be very sad to see an epidemic end for example. The epidemic situation could also be of great help to some people who "receive" important subsidies: I prefer not to think about the filthy miseries I witnessed in Haiti. In short, the panic cleverly maintained in the media could cause fear that would lead to the consumption of vaccine. As usual in classical medicine, ie industry, often does nothing but treat the fear she knows so well orchestrate herself.[…] " Read more.
and so:

To all those who tell me that it takes courage to approach Ebola patients I answer this sentence of Shakespeare that any doctor should meditate:

Visible dangers frighten us less than our imaginary terrors.

Finally, to the cowards who have never approached a sick man, who have never left the cozy comforts of their office, but who allow themselves to vomit their instinctive hatred, I have to say to them:
Sutor, nec supra crepidam!
do not sutor, supra crepidam. - (Pliny the old, 35,85.)
That the shoemaker does not judge above the crepid - To each his job.




Dr. Edouard Broussalian, Planet Homéo
0 x
"We do science with facts, as is a house with stones, but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a heap of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" Exnihiloest
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6810
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: Burgundy
x 114

Re: France is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.

Unread Messageby Janic » 20/12/18, 15:07

after the indication of the video on the alutotal, here is a comment of its author Hypatie
It's the Alu Total!

Answer to Jean-François Cliche: Vaccines, the big bad aluminum
Hello Mr. Cliche,

It is with great interest that I read your article criticizing the video I posted on youtube about the dangers of aluminum: Alu Total.

Will you give me a right of reply?

In the meantime, here is my review of your article. It will take you a little while to read everything, and a little bit of work to check everything, but you get paid for it, do not you? Unlike me ... Will you read this email until the end? I wonder

So let's go !

First, let's specify: " aluminum "is not synonymous with" vaccination But it is synonymous with " maximum profit For the industry. There are safer alternatives, and probably less profitable ones. My goal is to make the vaccination safer, and that, nobody can blame me for it. (Manufacturers have no legal responsibility since 1986, they have no interest in making vaccination safer, especially if journalists such as you defend without any critical thinking).

I see that you quote from the outset the study of Jefferson 2004, which I quote myself in the video (01: 25: 58 and sources) to laugh nicely, because not only this meta-analysis is about a very small number of studies (only 5), on a single vaccine (the aluminum-containing DTP) and only a few very specific local side effects, with little danger, and in the short term (study time ranging from 24h at 6 weeks after injection).
In addition, here is what concludes the synthesis of the study

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK70400/

"The overall study quality was described as low, reporting was poor, and there was limited information on how specific adverse events were defined or variability in definition". (translation: "the general quality of the study is low, the follow-up is poor, and there was only limited information on how the side effects were defined, or variations in their definition" ...) This is not really a guarantee of quality ...

But the most amusing is of course his very famous conclusion: "Despite a lack of good-quality evidence, we do not recommend that any further research is undertaken".

In other words : we have no solid evidence, but we do not recommend continuing to study the safety of aluminum vaccines. Admit that it's funny, especially since we are in 2004 and therefore the operation of this adjuvant and its precise pharmacokinetics are still unknown! While aluminum is injected to almost all human beings born on Earth ...
I assure you that if for you, as for our dear Paul Offit, Jefferson's analysis is valid, you should warn WHO and the CDC, because they only display Mitkus to ensure the safety of adjuvants. aluminum. And since you have not seen the video, I will spoil the suspense: the FDA, which produced Mitkus, has archived the study and is careful not to mention it on its extremely short page devoted to vaccine adjuvants:

https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/201 ... 284520.htm
Note "this web page may be out of date" above the text 

So I say it, and anyone who makes sense would come to the same conclusion: there is no study today that guarantees the safety of injected aluminum in infants. ANY : Is not this a question for you, science journalist?

Obviously, you did not see my film: I spent 18 months compiling all the studies, to do this work of monk as you say, precisely because no journalist does it. But we, parents, need to know, it is urgent: it is not a theoretical question, but of the life of our children!

I am Mrs. Everyone, I took this time, unpaid obviously. I contacted the specialized scientists one by one to be sure to understand ... and it took me a lot of time.

But let's continue. As you have not taken the time to watch my video, I will have to detail some concepts that you omit in your article, and that are fundamental. All sources are accessible, and the links are in the document under my video, because obviously I say nothing without proof, otherwise what would it be for?

https://alutotal.wordpress.com/

Even though aluminum (Al3 +) is present "naturally" (or rather, since the industrial pollution that introduced it into our environment), it is mostly stopped by the barriers of the body, is not it? this not? EFSA (in Europe) concludes for example that only 0,1% of the aluminum present in the diet, in soluble form, enters durably into the body (1% in the baby).

However, during an intramuscular injection, it is 100% of the vaccine aluminum (form of fine particles) that is introduced into the body, without the filter of natural barriers. It makes a huge difference, especially since adjuvants are captured by macrophages and remain in particulate form, migrating throughout the body to the brain. I recently noticed this new argument from your community of thought, which basically says "there is no aluminum in aluminum admixtures", or, in any case, that adjuvants of aluminum are not toxic ...

I wonder how a Cartesian mind can say such an enormity. When I spoke to Professor Christopher Exley (the global aluminum specialist, who has been working on the subject since 35 years ago) he replied tersely: " that they read this to understand ". I put you the link: https://aacijournal.biomedcentral.com/t ... 018-0305-2

As it is pithy (and complex), I will summarize.

Aluminum, in all its forms, is absolutely incompatible with life, and therefore extremely toxic. Including the ion Al3 + (and that's no longer a secret for anyone, literature is full of studies on the subject). Aluminum salts are not less toxic: that is why they have a strong adjuvant property. They cause the immune reaction.

Aluminum is still considered a foreign body: it is Impossible to incorporate into the living metabolism (unlike iron or zinc ...) The body will always try to eliminate it, especially if it is in the form of fine particles, while the Al3 + ion passes under the meshes of the net (the macrophages) and will store itself a little everywhere in the body, in the tissues, and also in the brain (with a strong affinity for the myelin of the nerves): Al3 + has the property of also attacking the Blood-brain barrier, I refer you for example to "the dialysis dementia "(15: 36).

The amount of aluminum (Al3 +) is well specified on the leaflets: for example, 0,82 mg of Al3 + for 0,5 mL in the GSK Infanrix Hexa.

Al3 + ion and aluminum salts are very pro-inflammatory. This is why they are used as adjuvants. You better understand why your remark "Aluminic additives are never metallic aluminum, but molecules containing one or more Al atoms, such as aluminum hydroxide, Al (OH) 3, which is not besides not rare in nature "is completely wrong, it is even dramatic to affirm such a thing. How did you come to this conclusion? That's what I want to know.

Finally, you are referring to our dear Academy of Medicine and its famous 2012 report, which is also very amusing: you compare the pharmacokinetics of particulate aluminum injected intramuscularly, to the pharmacokinetics of soluble aluminum injected intravenously: you see Where is the problem ? These two forms are not comparable, they do not have the same route of administration. They do not have the same pharmacokinetics. A study on adjuvants must necessarily consist in injecting this adjuvant into a living muscle. No choice, if you want to respect a scientific protocol "based on the facts".

In addition, the Academy of Medicine quotes the only study available (at the time) on the pharmacokinetics of aluminum adjuvants: Flarend 1997 which I speak at length in my video (11: 40), and which observes an extremely slow elimination aluminum (5,6% for aluminum hydroxide). The study also observed a cerebral penetration of aluminum: and yet, the study lasted only one month (it is very short to observe the migration of aluminum). No other official study will be carried out under these conditions: only the study of Khan in 2013, in France, will reproduce this experiment (study financed by our taxes ) on mice, finally allowing, after 86 years, to know the pharmacokinetics of aluminum additives. For disposal, Flarend remains the reference ... so there is still work and studies to produce!

It's interesting that you're talking about safety thresholds because, if we take the Mitkus study and its curves based on the absorption rates observed by Flarend (very bad study that was archived by the FDA as I do you I said it ... and to know why, it would have been necessary to look at my 3 argument to 32: 34): the curves of each adjuvant are below the American security levels (ATSDR: 1mg / kg / day) but exceed the security levels European (EFSA: 1mg / kg / week). Especially since Mitkus is careful to separate hydroxide from aluminum phosphate, while 2 are injected on infants the same day (at least in the French calendar, but this should also be the case in North America) .

This is extremely serious: it means that the doses of aluminum that American and French (and probably Canadian) infants receive are officially toxic during the first year of life. (EFSA is based on recent studies, unlike the ATSDR). This body burden of a neurotoxin, which is shown to enter the brain via macrophages (attracted by CCL2 / MCP1 attracting molecules), within a tiny infant organism that is in full development neurological ... it's unacceptable and extremely dangerous!

(see the studies cited in my sources, including Flarend 1997, Khan 2013, 2017, 2017 and 2018 ...)

Which parent would rationally accept to inject this neurotoxic if he had access to scientific studies, financed, I recall it by OUR taxes (in France)? I contacted these researchers, they are happy to answer even the most advanced questions.

In your journal, there are regular articles on the deplorable state of health of the younger generations, their neurological disorders, autoimmune disorders ... Our children are not in good health. The search for causes should be considered with much more seriousness! There is always a cause, you have to look for it instead of saying "it's natural". When one attends since 30 years to the explosion of the neuro-developmental disorders, it is our duty to look for probable causes and biologically plausible, you do not believe?

https://www.lesoleil.com/actualite/sant ... ca6a6d23f4

This is the case of aluminum injected at a critical age for neurodevelopment: the biological plausibility is demonstrated, it is necessary to apply the precautionary principle.

Our leaders now invoke the "natural" or even just "genetics" to talk about autism, it is like saying "it is the divine will: we can do nothing about it". It is not rational. This is especially unacceptable.

You spent half a day on the subject, I spent 18 months, working every day: I read all the studies I found on the topic of safety and pharmacokinetics of aluminum adjuvants I contacted each scientist to be sure to understand. I peeled every official document, every report. You only look at my introduction, and then you write things scientifically false on a subject that you do not control, on a subject of unprecedented gravity, which affects all the infants of the world ...

I am a mother. I am rational. I practice the scientific process. I have always done my vaccines without asking myself a question: but when my child is born, I told myself that I could no longer afford not to know. And when I started looking, I found everything online: reports, studies, data. Everything is here. And yes, it took me 18 months because when we start to study the subject of the safety of aluminum adjuvants, we fall into a bottomless pit, a well of darkness that I never imagined. I have been wearing this project on my (small) shoulders since all this time, despite my full time job and my young child.

Because I said to myself, just like you very precisely: the public does not have the time to study the question. Parents, even pediatricians do not have the information. Studies fail to be relayed. Why did not any journalist do this job ? Are you really neutral? Absent conflicts of interest? Without cognitive dissonance? I'm not paid for myself ... so I'm free. If I spent so much time, it is so that all the parents can have access to the documents (all accessible in my sources), that we can judge scientifically, rationally.

I repeat: aluminum is not essential for vaccination: the Institut Pasteur has even created a replacement, calcium phosphate (biocompatible component), used between 74 and 86, then abandoned only for a history of financial profitability (merger with Mérieux).

The abusive and anglophone terms you use to describe my work do not do you credit: you trample my video without having taken the time to look at it, which is however a minimum. Would you, perhaps, unknowingly be afraid of what you could learn ? I assure you that there is something to be afraid of. But there is also something to have hope!

It's your job to inform people, not mine. It's up to you to do this monk work, but do you think it's not necessary? Personally, I took the time out of my spare time: I am now qualified to speak on this subject of extreme importance for global public health. Not you. Not yet. You are convinced that you are right: it is perhaps the worst thing for a scientific mind, not to doubt. Doubt is the basis of the scientific process. Because you see, my goal is precisely to raise the level of global demand: we must become much more demanding, much more documented, much more intelligent. We must not trust blindly, like the believers of a sect.

I am a mother concerned by the vaccination, it is the neurological future of my child that is at stake: I have too many friends whose children are autistic today, or disabled motor, nonverbal, asthmatic or allergic ... I'm sure you have some, too. We must act.

We must stop injecting a neurotoxic into the infant's developing body: this act is barbaric, obsolete, as much as asbestos in walls, lead pipes, cigarettes and alcohol during pregnancy, or mercury fillings.

To speak of this subject with such casualness, I find it frightening, and frightening.

Finally you finish on the pharmacovigilance (see 47: 51), vast subject ... unfortunately.

Then, when you quote at the end of your article, Petrovsky's study, which I quote myself, to state that "except for rare side effects, they are safe," is frankly debatable. Yes Petrovsky says that aluminum is safe ... it's unfortunately a must to have the right to study aluminum. But the list (not exhaustive) that it does all the side effects, and not least ... is nothing reassuring. Especially since studies have multiplied in the last few years, bringing a more precise vision of this absolutely central topic for public health (see my sources, again).

There is one thing I am sure of: you are a good person, and even if you despise me, you want to work for the common good. Me too. So I make you a proposal: watch my video and discuss it together. I do not want to be right, I "think" to be right, until proven otherwise. Moreover, my conclusion is clear: aluminum in all these forms is very dangerous for the infant (not only in vaccines).

I'm open, I ask you, "prove to me that I am wrong". But with real arguments, searched, documented. Yes, it takes time, but the stakes are huge. And I hope that one day you will have the immense courage to reach out to me, to inform the public and to tell the industrialists: stop using aluminum as an adjuvant, there are safer alternatives (and ultimately more "profitable" for the community).

Help us, the public, you who are journalist. Put aside your beliefs and watch carefully what science says, face to face, with courage (you need a package). And you will see, like me, the horror of this absolutely unimaginable fraud.

But quite frankly, I realize that you have a career, so you are bound hand and foot.

...

...

You are still here ? Or did I lose you?

cordialement,

Hypatia

PS: it's still fun that you're a Quebecer, I dream to visit your country for a long time!



Mr. Cliche's answer, 2 hours later:

That's interesting. In your introduction, you state that "only one study guarantees the safety of aluminum adjuvants. And it's. All. There is only one". Now you tell me now that you had read Jefferson (2004), who quotes about forty works on this question, and that you quote it. You know what is called spreading falsehoods consciously? It's a shameless lie.

Good luck.
Dear Mr. Cliche,
Jefferson's study DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE SAFETY OF ALUMINUM ADJUVANTS. It is not mentioned by any health agency, because it is very very bad (and does not relate specifically to aluminum admixtures, by the way).
Where is the shameless lie?
Kisses!
Heck, me who thought Quebeckers were nice people ...

OFFICIAL SITES RELATING TO ALUMINUM ADJUVANTS

USA:

WHO: http://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/commi ... n_2012/fr/
CDC: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/conce ... vants.html
FDA: note that the FDA no longer cites any studies on aluminum (and especially not Mitkus 2011) https://www.fda.gov/biologicsbloodvacci ... 187810.htm
Oxford Vaccine Group: http://vk.ovg.ox.ac.uk/vaccine-ingredients
Children Hospital of Philadelphia (Paul Offit): https://www.chop.edu/centers-programs/v ... s/aluminum
American Academy of Pediatrics: https://www.healthychildren.org/English ... dence.aspx
La France :

Vaccination-info-service.fr: Is the aluminum of vaccines dangerous?
https://vaccination-info-service.fr/Que ... -dangereux

ANSM: "Vaccines containing aluminum are safe"
https://www.ansm.sante.fr/S-informer/Co ... Communique

ANSES: https://www.anses.fr/fr/content/exposition-à-lAluminum-by-the food


OFFICIAL REPORTS ON ALUMINUM

Academy of Medicine: "The vaccine adjuvants: what news in 2012? "
http://www.academie-medecine.fr/wp-cont ... t-ANM1.pdf

High Council of Public Health: "Aluminum and Vaccines"
https://www.hcsp.fr/Explore.cgi/hcspr20 ... accins.pdf

National Academy of Pharmacy: "aluminum additives: the point in 2016"
http://www.acadpharm.org/dos_public/Rap ... CORR_5.pdf

Workshop on Aluminum in vaccines. Puerto Rico 11-12 May 2000, p.40 (adjuvants are useless in recalls: but manufacturers leave them because it is more practical to produce only one formula.)
https://www.autismhelpforyou.com/AL%20-%201.pdf

https://www.autismhelpforyou.com/AL%20-%202.pdf

Worshop on non-clinical safety evaluation of preventive vaccines, 2002, p.220 (declaration of Nathalie Garçon "if aluminum arrived today on the market, it would not be accepted")
http://aitia.fr/erd/wp-content/uploads/ ... -p.220.pdf

EMA Guidelines on Vaccine Adjuvants: (2004 and 2005):
2004 version: https://www.ema.europa.eu/documents/sci ... nes_en.pdf

final route: https://www.ema.europa.eu/documents/sci ... ote_en.pdf

ANSM: Aluminum in cosmetics (2011)
https://ansm.sante.fr/content/download/ ... s-2011.pdf

ex-AFSSA: Aluminum in food (2008)
https://www.anses.fr/fr/system/files/RCCP2008sa0196.pdf

Aluminum allowable weekly allowance set by EFSA (p.29)
https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/do ... a.2008.754

Report on the Gulf War Syndrom, 2008 (p.119-120)
https://www.va.gov/rac-gwvi/docs/Commit ... t_2008.pdf



REPORTS ON VACCINE SAFETY

IOM Report (2012 - Institute of Medicine): Adverse Effects of vaccines: evidence and causality

https://www.nap.edu/read/13164/chapter/1

quoted by the CDC: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/autism.html

This IOM Report explicitly states that for 135 serious side effects (including autism, in connection with DTP, p.546), it is impossible to conclude or exclude a link with vaccination: it is therefore impossible to to affirm that there is no link between autism and vaccination.

ETC ...


DECLARATION OF INTEREST

I declare that I have received absolutely no funding for the production of this video which is not monetized (Creative Commons). I am not in contact with industry or patient associations.


NB: I deleted all the rest of the links that everyone will be able to consult on the site of Hipatie, but here it can not exceed 30 links
0 x
"We do science with facts, as is a house with stones, but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a heap of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" Exnihiloest

User avatar
Exnihiloest
Grand Econologue
Grand Econologue
posts: 1258
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 63

Re: France is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.

Unread Messageby Exnihiloest » 20/12/18, 18:37

Heard this morning on the radio: the flu vaccination was very popular this year. Like what people can still resist the misinformation anti-vaccine activists, this is the good news of the day.
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6810
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: Burgundy
x 114

Re: France is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.

Unread Messageby Janic » 20/12/18, 19:41

by Exnihiloest »20 / 12 / 18, 19: 37

Heard this morning on the radio: the flu vaccination was very popular this year. Like what people can still resist the misinformation anti-vaccine activists, this is the good news of the day.
Weird, even the internet and public health (official organ are silent on this request, but where are they going to look for all that ?!
So more asked it means nothing without being encrypted and below are figures.

While public health goals are set at 75% for the population at risk, coverage against seasonal influenza remains below 50% (46% in December 31 2016)
Vaccination is recommended for people at risk complications (people aged 65 and older, people (adults and children) with certain chronic diseases, pregnant women, obese people) and those who are in contact with them.
so not the others !!!!
https://www.santemagazine.fr/actualites ... ies-302374
1. 2016 Review of the Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Campaign: Less Than One
person in two for whom influenza is a risk is vaccinated ................. 4
a) 47,4% vaccination coverage slightly down (-0,9 point) compared to 2015

https://solidarites-sante.gouv.fr/IMG/p ... _0410_.pdf

VAXIGRIP
Laboratory: Sanofi Pasteur
Last updated: September 23 2018 12: 26: 09

This vaccine is no longer marketed in France since the end of January 2018.
https://www.mesvaccins.net/web/vaccines/62-vaxigrip
ETC ...
Like what people can still resist the misinformation anti-vaccine activists, this is the good news of the day.
the sweet dreamer, you must! : Cheesy:
0 x
"We do science with facts, as is a house with stones, but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a heap of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" Exnihiloest
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6810
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: Burgundy
x 114

Re: France is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.

Unread Messageby Janic » 20/12/18, 20:09

re-moving to this topic:

Warming up: Permafrost Disease is coming ...
Message by izentrop »20 / 12 / 18, 01: 03
Fortunately a vaccine was quickly developed against Ebola. https://www.letemps.ch/sciences/cette-y ... irus-ebola and allowed to wreck the epidemic, no offense to Janic.

Exnihiloest »20 / 12 / 18, 20: 16
Janic wrote:
Fortunately a vaccine was quickly developed against Ebola. https://www.letemps.ch/sciences/cette-y ... irus-ebola and allowed to wreck the epidemic, no offense to Janic.

... Unlike you, Janic reads ALL the article, him, ...


and draws only what suits him, in an illegible flooding (it is also positive, I wonder who will read this jumble).

After difficulties of development, the last vaccine against ebola is a success because remember, it is a person in two who without vaccine dies ebola.
"The rVSV-ZEBOV had then demonstrated an efficiency of the order of 75 to 100% in 7651 people according to the review The Lancet."


janic »20 / 12 / 18, 21: 01
... Unlike you, Janic reads ALL the article, him, ...

and draws only what suits him, in an illegible flooding (it is also positive, I wonder who will read this jumble).

Obviously not you, it still requires a sufficient analytical mind!
After difficulties of development, the last vaccine against ebola is a success because remember, it is a person in two who without vaccine dies ebola.
"The rVSV-ZEBOV had then demonstrated an efficiency of the order of 75 to 100% in 7651 people according to the review The Lancet."

This is the same speech that was held for each new vaccine. The smallpox vaccine was also considered "effective" and it was a health disaster. It's beautiful blind faith!
besides the Lancet publishes articles, it is not an organism of control and verification of the articles which it publishes under the responsibility of their authors as he published the article of Wakefield and Smith and their team. English court validated by condemning the College of Physicians)
So read ALL that is stressed, if you have trouble reading everything!
Although everything leads to believe it, we are not yet sure that this vaccine will work as well in the present situation
Laurent Kaiser, virologist
It remains to be confirmed whether these 39 cases are indeed cases of Ebola, "says Laurent Kaiser, a virologist at HUG. There are many infectious diseases in the region with similar symptoms
. Like for AIDS!
0 x
"We do science with facts, as is a house with stones, but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a heap of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" Exnihiloest
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6810
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: Burgundy
x 114

Re: France is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.

Unread Messageby Janic » 22/12/18, 16:32

All new, all hot! The warning of oncologists and spouses Delepine on the fearful increase of cancers of the uterus after Gardasil vaccine, up to more than 100% according to the recent statistics of vaccinated countries.



December 20 2018
Gardasil: vaccine hysteria summarized by two oncologists
The vaccine theory, always profitable for the same, sticks to the FACTS: is this vaccination anti-HPV effective? NO, and even worse, it is counterproductive and helps to increase the risk of invasive cervical cancer (if we add to that the dramatic side effects of this vaccine, there is no need for further introduction to following interview ...). Attention, vaccinated young girls having an increased risk of developing cervical cancer in 5 10 years after their vaccination, they must really make smears sufficiently regular ...




See as well:
French law proposal to add the HPV vaccine Gardasil to the list of 11 vaccines already mandatory

Toulouse: Gerard Bapt advises girls to get vaccinated against papillomavirus

MR, Ecolo and Défi, to expand vaccination against papillomavirus

No to the enlargement of the HPV vaccination (in school medicine in particular): our young people in danger with the proposal of Mr. Brotchi!

Calvary post-vaccine

Gardasil: this vaccine has made hell hell for my daughter, I will fight to the end

http://initiativecitoyenne.be/
0 x
"We do science with facts, as is a house with stones, but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a heap of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" Exnihiloest
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Grand Econologue
Grand Econologue
posts: 1258
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 63

Re: France is one of the worst European pupils in terms of vaccination.

Unread Messageby Exnihiloest » 22/12/18, 19:20

Still heard today: flu vaccination has been in high demand this year. As it is confirmed that people still know how to resist the misinformation of anti-vaccine activists.
0 x




  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 1 guest