izentrop wrote:robob wrote:Mollimard should be careful with his immortal time bias
"Professor" robob goes there with his little theory pulled from the hat.
I advise you to follow the webinar and come back afterwards, a little better informed.
Aren't those around you a little skeptical when you come out with your theories on vaccines?

"My entourage"
was skeptical.
Now people around me watch their TV or read their duck with suspicion and are starting to look at alternative content.
As for the webinar: I doubt they would agree to discuss anything, as usual.
The SFPT is above all an organ for the promotion of $$ patented pills $$, if you see what I'm hard-boiled.
But as you seem to know them well (I imagine you quite a "patented pill seller"), you can also tell them to come and discuss it here by starting by dismantling my "theories", in particular the one where I explain below above that there is no immortal time bias in the IVM study criticized by Mollimard. I am not an expert and am quite capable of admitting my mistakes if there are any. For the moment, no one has come to contradict my modest analysis. Mollimard blocked me on tweeter after giving him the same explanation, source supporting it.
Yet it must be easy to demonstrate the idiot that I am with his "smoky and dangerous theories for democratic stability" in the eyes of all.