Covid and Didier Raoult (supporter of hydroxychloroquine): analyzes on the pandemic

[reinoso]

the database of 30 IHU patients is still current and, as announced, the study republished

30423.jpg (56.19 KB) Viewed times 458

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a ... 7523001075

[sicetaitsimple]

the database of 30 IHU patients is still current and, as announced, the study republished

Well then, I thought that:
“Covid appeared thanks to the media then compulsory tests. It disappeared as soon as being tested was no longer compulsory and the media talked about something else.” excerpt from Robob's post yesterday)
Raoult would have lied by only “treating” imaginary patients?

[izentrop]

Either way, this bogus study without consensus should have been withdrawn a long time ago... like the others in the same vein.

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

Dare to say the guy who endorses the "quasi" imposed globalized trial of an experimental product (RNA) based on bogus studies and false conclusions provided by their manufacturers...

[Janic]

based on bogus studies and false conclusions provided by their manufacturers...

as has always been the case with vaccines and other medicines. Judges and party!

[Remundo]

right on topic



very interesting to listen to.

[izentrop]

very interesting to listen to.

He continues to praise his antibiotic-based remedy to treat a viral illness and it always comes across well for his fan club

[Remundo]

you praise the things that work at 0% infection transmission, which are also dangerous, with trash tweets and it looks creamy!

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

If antibiotics are indeed ineffective against viruses, they are ineffective against opportunistic bacteria which are associated with viral infectious diseases, particularly respiratory ones, and which cause secondary infections. Here too, everything is not either black or white.