No but Pierre Koryreinoso wrote: pfizer sinks




No but Pierre Koryreinoso wrote: pfizer sinks
Steve Kirsch
Breaking: You can now sue the mRNA COVID vaccine manufacturers for damages and the FDA is required to take the COVID vaccines off the market. Why? Adulteration. The plasmid bioactive contaminant sequences were NOT pointed out to the regulatory authorities. It's considered adulteration. I just got off the phone with Professor Byram Bridle and Dr. Robert Malone on this.
Translate the post
10:02 PM Oct 21, 2023
Breaking: You can now sue mRNA COVID vaccine manufacturers for damages and the FDA is required to remove COVID vaccines from the market. For what? Falsification. Plasmid bioactive contaminant sequences have NOT been reported to regulatory authorities. This is considered falsification. I just got off the phone with Professor Byram Bridle and Dr. Robert Malone about this.
The FDA is now at a crossroads. Either they admit that they knew about the plasma contamination, and failed to disclose that to the public and to the outside committees, or they can claim that they didn't know about it in which case Pfizer is liable. But we have the Pfizer documents that were given to the FDA so we know what the FDA got. And I seriously doubt there's any disclosure of SV40 contamination. That means we have an adulterated vaccine and the FDA has to remove it from the market until the adulteration is fixed. If the FDA doesn't do that, they should face criminal prosecution for endangering the public, and not following the law.
The FDA now finds itself at a crossroads. Either they admit they knew about the plasma contamination and failed to disclose that to the public and outside committees, or they can claim they didn't know about it, in which case Pfizer is liable. But we have the Pfizer documents that were turned over to the FDA, so we know what the FDA got. And I seriously doubt there will be any disclosure of SV40 contamination. This means we have an adulterated vaccine and the FDA must remove it from the market until the adulteration is fixed. If the FDA fails to do so, it should face criminal charges for endangering the public and failing to comply with the law.
I just got off the phone with attorney Warner Mendenhall. He confirmed I wrote is accurate and the litigation floodgates are now open.
Here is a list of 90 lawyers that you can contact if you want to sue the vaccine manufacturers:
https://airtable.com/appGIUGnttjzscdJF/ ... bLpclbtF0W
The SV40 promoter is found in all the vials and it was in the gene sequence that was provided to the regulators. There is no mistake. The problem was that neither drug company ever pointed it out to the regulators. It's an unapproved contaminant that doesn't meet the standards set. So the regulators are off the hook. But if the regulators don't take action, then they dig themselves into a very deep hole. The law requires the FDA to stop the vaccine.
The SV40 promoter is found in all the vials and was in the genetic sequence that was provided to regulators. There are no mistakes. The problem was that neither drug company ever reported it to regulators. This is an unapproved contaminant that does not meet established standards. Regulators are therefore off the hook. But if regulators do not act, they will sink into a very deep hole. The law requires the FDA to stop the vaccine.
Here's the 2 hour interview with Kevin McKernan, Byram Bridle, and Chris Martenson where you can hear first hand the evidence that they KNEW the SV40 promoter was in the vaccine, but they DELIBERATELY decided to conceal it from the regulators. Bombshell.
For all age groups, the drop in the number of doses injected corresponds to a significant drop in mortality in Europe.
If this drop in mortality is drastic for age groups 45 and over, it is less significant, but present, for age groups 0 to 45. All age groups are close to so-called normal mortality (normal range).
It is very strange that our government is proposing a new vaccination campaign when mortality in Europe seems completely normal, especially since the side effects following these injections seem very critical.
How to interpret this drop?
In the previous analysis, the one which covered 2021 to 2022, nothing shows real effectiveness of the injections. We should have seen a constant decline as the doses were injected. However, this is never visible during this period.
In many media, we have heard that the protection provided by the “vaccine” does not exceed six months. This is why a new vaccination campaign is being proposed this fall. Once again, why propose a vaccination campaign when mortality in Europe has practically returned to a so-called normal range? Furthermore, this interpretation shows once again that the protection offered by these injections is more than illusory, if not completely zero. In this case, the problem of side effects is really paramount.
Methodology
In order to carry out this analysis, we will use the same software as previously: EMM. The latter was specially developed to allow European deaths and doses injected to be displayed simultaneously for each week of the year, each year of the Covid-19 crisis.
The results will be proposed for the different age groups defined by the EuroMomo site and correspond to the years 2022-2023.
The technical details, such as the crossing of the two databases, are specified in the previous study. You can refer to it to refine these results.
Legend of graphs:
The solid blue curve represents deaths linked to the left scale.
The blue dotted curve represents the injected doses, linked to the scale on the right.
The gray dotted curve represents the expected mortality (baseline) calculated by EuroMomo.
The gray area represents the expected normal range calculated by EuroMomo. This is the area of uncertainty in expected mortality.
The pink dotted curve, present only for the 0-14 age group, is automatically generated by EMM. It corresponds to the doses injected in the 15-44 age group which is supposed to represent the parents. She has no interest in this study
sicetaitsimple wrote:reinoso wrote:This new study aims to highlight the drastic drop in vaccine doses administered and the fall in mortality in Europe
We can always look for correlations with sophisticated software. The “aim” is significant from this point of view.
But would the simultaneous return to mortality considered “normal” in Europe and the drastic drop in the number of vaccine doses not be due simply to a virtual disappearance of COVID in Europe?
Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 83 guests