izmentropBut how can we explain the numerous failures of the testimonies?
and the zozo who provides the stick to be beaten: who established these rules? Proponents of vaccination by making themselves judge and party at the same time and eliminating all possible competitionThe rigor of a study carried out according to the rules of the art
and what are the peers in question? The same vaccinators who call bias, testimonies that do not go in their direction! Too easy!eliminates as much as possible the biases of the testimonies, that the "peers"
and again and again, who are the "experts in question? Still the same as before!come to reinforce (or refute) subsequently, with their expertise.
For example, the H meet all the conditions listed above, with their hundreds of thousands of experts who have accumulated millions of testimonies for decades by eliminating the bias of false testimonies from "pseudo scientists" at the orders of the pharmaceutical manufacturers or BP.