Opinions about Covid vaccines, immunity, side effects and immunology

[Janic]

gegyx wrote:

But how can we explain the numerous failures of the testimonies?

izmentrop

The rigor of a study carried out according to the rules of the art

and the zozo who provides the stick to be beaten: who established these rules? Proponents of vaccination by making themselves judge and party at the same time and eliminating all possible competition

eliminates as much as possible the biases of the testimonies, that the "peers"

and what are the peers in question? The same vaccinators who call bias, testimonies that do not go in their direction! Too easy!

come to reinforce (or refute) subsequently, with their expertise.

and again and again, who are the "experts in question? Still the same as before!
For example, the H meet all the conditions listed above, with their hundreds of thousands of experts who have accumulated millions of testimonies for decades by eliminating the bias of false testimonies from "pseudo scientists" at the orders of the pharmaceutical manufacturers or BP.

[gegyx]

Certainly This only convinces you. This is your essential thing.

[Janic]

05/10/23, 13:18
gegyx

Certainly: This only convinces you. This is your essential thing.

It is especially essential for the future victims of this vaccine “holocaust” and for whom more and more individuals, throughout the world, are taking a step back from this official propaganda under the leadership of the BP poison merchants. .
Afterwards, what happens on the ground, in the cottages?

[reinoso]

Pierre Chaillot relates the concerns of women regarding their menstrual cycles and the consequences on birth rates.

I add a second layer for those that are hard on the sheet

[Janic]

excellent as usual and verifiable!

[izentrop]

excellent as usual and verifiable!

Absolutely https://www.huffingtonpost.fr/actualite ... 90596.html

[gegyx]

Is this kind of investigation irrefutable?

For the ANSM, “these are mainly short-term and self-limiting events”, which do not make it possible to establish a “direct link” between vaccination and painful, delayed or abnormally heavy periods.

We minimize the taking of testimonies,
and above all we do not explain why this enormous increase in menstrual problems...

"direct link" ? => disturbances following vaccination. Short-lived for the lucky ones, if the poison wears off quickly.

A clue for the ANSM: the full moon perhaps?

[Robob]

excellent as usual and verifiable!

Absolutely https://www.huffingtonpost.fr/actualite ... 90596.html

Article 2 years old.

Since according to SCIENCE (not a propaganda media):
https://bmjmedicine.bmj.com/content/1/1/e000297

“Participants 19 people aged 622 to 18 years with cycles lasting 45 to 24 days and consecutive data on at least three cycles before and one cycle after covid (vaccinated group; n = 38), and those with at least four consecutive cycles over a similar period (unvaccinated group; n = 14).”

conclusions Vaccination against Covid-19 is associated with a small, probably temporary, change in the length of the menstrual cycle, but no change in the duration of periods.

For the BMJ to say it half-heartedly, it really must not have succeeded in biasing it.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.117 ... 7221109375

"Results:
A total of 950 women responded to the survey between July and September 2021. A total of 408 women met the inclusion criteria and 184 reported the following characteristics: frequency (normal 43,47%, uncommon 25% and frequent 31,53%), regularity (regular 51,08%). %, irregular 42,93% and absent/amenorrhea 5,97%), duration (normal 65,21%, prolonged 26,08%, absent/amenorrhea 8,69%) and volume (heavy 41,84%, light 20,65 .6,52% and absent/amenorrhea XNUMX%).

Conclusions:
SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination can influence the menstrual cycle and cause alterations."

And you can't imagine the difficulty in publishing this type of study which only very slightly contradicts the doctrine.

[reinoso]

speech is freed!

https://ifunny.co/video/by-charles-drea ... -yUXLemXDA

[izentrop]

https://bmjmedicine.bmj.com/content/1/1/e000297
Conclusions Covid-19 vaccination is associated with a small, probably temporary, change in menstrual cycle length, but no change in period duration.

Which corroborates the conclusions of the ANSM and the EMA...
Especially since

Our dataset is limited in its number of post-vaccination cycles to assess the resolution of cycle length changes in individuals receiving two doses per cycle. We are also unable to account for the potential effect of covid-19 infections that unvaccinated and vaccinated participants may have acquired during the study on menstrual cycle outcomes. Our anonymized data is self-reported...

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.117 ... 7221109375

You are mixing up the conclusions because

conclusions:
SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination can influence the menstrual cycle and cause alterations.

It means “move along, there’s nothing to see”