We tested ChatGPT: ask your questions here without an account

[Obamot]

I am neither poor nor small another fake news kaka

[A.D. 44]

Question to chatgpt:

Does artificial intelligence harm human (natural) intelligence?

[Obamot]

Try asking him the question and you will get his answer.... or apply the formula: "WYSIWYG"...?

The best technological tool will never be JUST what everyone makes of it. But. I can't say if thinking makes you (more) stupid...? In principle it shouldn't.

It must be something to do with what people think, it's a choice. Let's look at the fact that a person can either be attracted by scientific research or by video games...but also be attracted by both!

Is "thinking" the ability to act in an organized and rational way, or is it the process of reflecting on one's emotions and feelings?
What connects knowledge and ideas and establishes a logical framework between them?

Multiple answers...

[Christophe]

Question to chatgpt:

Does artificial intelligence harm human (natural) intelligence?

Interesting question but sorry I have more credit...and I don't know if finally I want to finance the end of the world...or at least idiocracy...

I think other members (izy, exni...) have an account still credited...

[izentrop]

Question to chatgpt:
Does artificial intelligence harm human (natural) intelligence?

According to an article in the journal Futuribles, recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), in particular the rise of neural networks, are not likely to call into question the supremacy of the human brain. Neural networks and AI are not complex systems; they are ordered systems whose abilities may be superior to humans for certain tasks. In contrast, human intelligence is multifaceted, emotional and empathetic; it therefore has superior faculties to AI to accomplish many other tasks and function in a complex environment. The author concludes that AI and human intelligence are complementary1.

Interesting question but sorry I have more credit...

Just use Edge as your browser. ChatGpt is integrated there since the last updates.

To do this, hover the pointer over the "b" icon at the top right and click on "conversation".

By clicking on "information" you can also have information on the site visited, among other things...

b-edge.gif (129.18 KiB) Viewed 931 times

[Ahmed]

I'm not the first to notice that AI will definitely put the programmers who designed it (and everyone else) out of work, because programming is right up its alley... Not too smart of them, but the system is so configured that you can't do anything, even when you are aware of shooting yourself in both feet...

[izentrop]

How it works ...

[Ahmed]

It would be interesting to know the opinion of ChatGPT on the consequences of its widespread use on the various types of current jobs and what it suggests as changes to accommodate it.

[float]

it's done

The widespread use of technologies like ChatGPT can have a significant impact on various types of jobs today. Here are some thoughts on the potential consequences and suggested changes to accommodate these developments:

Automation of routine tasks: Jobs involving repetitive and predictable tasks, such as data entry, writing standardized reports, or answering common questions, could be automated through tools like ChatGPT. Workers should consider developing more creative and strategic skills to stay relevant in the job market.

Support for creativity and decision-making: ChatGPT can be used to help generate creative ideas, perform data analysis or provide recommendations. Workers could leverage these tools to enhance their own creativity and make more informed decisions.

New jobs related to AI: The development, management and maintenance of AI systems like ChatGPT will require experts in artificial intelligence. There will be a growing demand for professionals with skills in AI, AI ethics and AI security.

Retraining and further training: For those whose jobs are directly threatened by automation, retraining and further training are essential. Governments, companies and individuals should invest in lifelong learning to acquire new skills and adapt to changes in the labor market.

AI Oversight: In many industries, jobs will involve overseeing and monitoring AI systems to ensure they are operating ethically and reliably. This could include roles in quality verification, AI systems monitoring, and training data management.

Strengthening human skills: Human skills such as empathy, communication, complex problem solving and creativity will remain essential, as they are difficult to automate. Individuals should develop these skills to stand out in the job market.

Thinking about ethics and regulation: Governments and organizations should develop regulations and ethical standards to frame the use of AI, especially when it impacts employment. This could include rules on AI transparency, data protection and liability for harmful automated decisions.

Human-machine collaboration: Rather than seeing AI as a threat, it can be seen as a tool for workers to increase their productivity and accomplish more complex tasks in collaboration with AI systems.

In summary, the widespread adoption of technologies like ChatGPT can transform the employment landscape, but that doesn't necessarily mean the disappearance of all jobs. Workers will need to adapt by developing complementary skills, pursuing lifelong learning, and collaborating with AI systems to stay relevant in an ever-changing world. It is also essential for society to reflect on the ethical and regulatory impact of these technologies to ensure their responsible use.

[Ahmed]

The thank you box
Well, the least we can say is that ChatGPT didn't go too far and that there is no need for AI to lay these reassuring clichés. Several of his assertions, as kind as they are, are also quite questionable: AI programming currently requires specialists, but we can reasonably expect that this will soon be the job of the AI ​​itself; moreover, one does not spontaneously improvise as a high-level programmer through a retraining that is more wishful thinking than a realistic approach. One can also object to the proportion between those who will lose their means of subsistence and the few needed for these new jobs. As for ethics, it quickly risks appearing only in the discourse in the face of the rise in power of AI and the competition associated with it... Let's admit, however, that a substantial effort can still be made in this direction, the evolution of AI systems will probably always go faster than the laborious debates aimed at controlling them.
I'm surprised that "complex problem solving" is reassigned to humans: I have the impression that this AI hides its game well by trying to present itself as harmless.