Glyphosate: an effective ecological herbicide, not carcinogenic, not endocrine disrupting

[Obamot]

You should stop talking on a thread with a false title reflecting your pro-industrial positions (pro-vax, pro-nuclear, pro-remdesivir, pro-glyphosate, etc.) angelic positions with your content that is not brilliant...

[Janic]

he doesn't give a damn about the subjects, his role and objective is to squat the site and spread his usual vomit of zetetic fakenews there.

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

I only put the beginning and the end, but it's worth a look, all this machination summarized in 31 tweets...

If you have understood Baumann's Les Touites, you will be able to observe with amazement that it proves nothing at all! He just chatters into the void, turning the accusation around. Always on the side of the deadly bastards, huh, at attention, the Izy...

[izentrop]

Renewed harmlessness...

[gfgh64]

Pfft! no seriously, we are still there.

personal mosantos;

and the confidence that one can have in their independent studies!!

[izentrop]

Pfft! no seriously, we are still there.

Yes, because if you want to store carbon in the soil to fight global warming, it's an excellent tool for cultivating without plowing as in conservation agriculture.
At the doses used, it is not toxic for anyone, contrary to the assertions of anti-science activists like Foucart du Monde

Try to listen to scientists, instead of preachers of doom

[gfgh64]

ok, but when you analyze the ground, afterwards, not much life
personally I prefer the humus version in the soil to absorb the carbon, much more carbon
by restoring bacteria in the soil, even intensive agriculture gains, yields go up and the dosage of chemical inputs goes down

and to produce it, sure that at Mosanto they hired the marmot from Milka and that the carbon footprint is top (mole) too

[izentrop]

I prefect the humus version in the soil to absorb carbon, much more carbon
by restoring bacteria in the soil

It is precisely soil conservation agriculture that allows this the most, by working the soil the least, never leaving it bare, with intercrops with varieties of plants offering a high biomass.
Conventional farming and even more so organic farming only degrade the humus of the soil over time...

It was during lockdown...

[Janic]

It is precisely soil conservation agriculture that allows this the most, by working the soil the least, never leaving it bare, with intercrops with varieties of plants offering a high biomass.

conservation agriculture which has only copied organic farming from its origins

Conventional farming and even more so organic farming only degrade the humus of the soil over time...

conventional agriculture is an exaggeration of language, since what is really conventional is what dominated for centuries before the intervention of theagrochemicals destroyer of life.
As for the current AB authorizing tillage by mechanical instruments, it does not make these an obligation, but as a temporary passage from a mode with , followed by a mode without. Only the ignorant like the pseudo carnival zetetics believe the opposite.

[Obamot]

I prefect the humus version in the soil to absorb carbon, much more carbon
by restoring bacteria in the soil

It is precisely soil conservation agriculture that allows this the most, by working the soil the least, never leaving it bare, with intercrops with varieties of plants offering a high biomass.

...well, well, yes why not if it starts with a good intention... So, why not permaculture which is even closer to this "good intention"...