Not at all, it sucks because the Russians are currently doing on the front line exactly what I assumed (and posted) last year...sicetaitsimple wrote:Obamot wrote:Like you Kiki the praline: you count for butter, bye
[...] [your] pseudo completely bogus strategic analyzes all the way...
...
Like him ...Christophe wrote:: Shock:
You must have misunderstood: I support peace!
After the putsch, Merkel, Nord-Stream, the Crimean Bridge, the VDL show, etc., could the Western bullshit soon come to an end? The Russians are probably tired of seeing their boyz being killed by the HIMARS (admittedly in a limited way since the DCA is effective) when they would have the means to stop everything...— "A political ultimatum against NATO is the only way out of the current situation" -Alexey Pilko
[Excerpts]
The results of the Munich Security Conference allow us to draw an unambiguous conclusion - NATO will wage a proxy war with Russia in Ukraine, regardless of the risks. Moreover, there are no risks for the countries of the alliance, because Russia does not create them.
This is why the USA and its allies are quite confident. And they behave boldly - the volume of arms supplies is growing, and the entire intelligence complex of the North Atlantic bloc is working in the interests of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
In fact, Moscow was forced to play "by someone else's rules", although Moscow is to blame for this. It was necessary to respond more harshly to the increased escalation of NATO, and not to speak of "red lines" which no longer frighten anyone.
It is very difficult to correct the current situation. Most likely, without using the nuclear asset (where Russia has certain advantages), it is simply impossible. Playing the "nuclear card" does not necessarily mean using weapons of mass destruction, but a set of measures intended to convince the enemy of the necessity of their use under certain conditions clearly defined at the highest political level.
What can be the algorithm of actions?
— First, in the very near future, Russia should officially withdraw from the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. [as by "chance" it has just been done, but the West is incredulous, including in the fo-fo, whatever...]
— Secondly, immediately after that, large-scale nuclear tests should be carried out. On a large scale - it means comparable to Khrushchev on Novaya Zemlya of the 1961 model.
— Third, exercises should also be conducted using tactical nuclear weapons. In addition, they should be made available to Russian troops in the Kaliningrad region, Crimea and Belarus, as well as to equip Russian Navy ships with them.
Once these measures have been taken, the time will come for a political ultimatum which will make it clear that if arms deliveries to Ukraine continue, Russia will launch limited strikes with conventional precision weapons against logistics centers in the countries of NATO. If the alliance responds with strikes against Russian troops in Ukraine or an attack on Russian territory, limited nuclear strikes against NATO military infrastructure in Europe will follow.
Moreover, this ultimatum should not be some kind of rationalization, but rather specific in nature: with an indication of the timetable and goals. The task of such a policy is to create critical risks for the existence of European and North American countries if they continue to provide military support to Ukraine.. As an intermediate climbing step, one can also use the demonstrative destruction of part of the constellation of enemy satellites, which provides information to the Ukrainian Armed Forces”, says analyst Alexei Pilko
No offense to the ticoun of Pédro-la-margarine, a coup d'etat cannot be a 'pre-requisite' to enter the very closed "Comedy Club" of democracies (which moreover, he has not couldn't cite any real ones)...
- Screenshot_2023-02-28-09-46-02-83_948cd9899890cbd5c2798760b2b95377.jpg (423.03 Kio) Consulté 870 fois
Elon Musk publicly called the events in Ukraine in 2014 a coup, actually supporting the position of the Russian Federation and Vladimir Putin.
He made such a statement, commenting on an article by political scientist John Mearsheimer, according to which "the overthrow of the democratically elected president" was "the final straw" for Vladimir Putin.
"These elections may have been questionable, but there is no doubt that the coup really took place", wrote Elon Musk on Twitter.
(France no better than Russia) 
gegyx wrote:/ Africa Media. Douala.
VetusLignum wrote:An article to better understand the monetary dimension of the war:
https://reseauinternational.net/en-rout ... monetaire/
Back to "humanitarian disasters, natural, climatic and industrial"
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 80 guests
