ABC2019 wrote:[...] is nothing wrong with what I said [...]
But you didn't say anything...
And that's where I disagree I told you it was going to heat up
We are correct with you, there is no more insult SO you are expected to respond fairly!
Tell yourself that, you're not at home here... You'd better have a "normal" behavior, so answer
Obamot wrote:His "90%” of efficiency relate well “lethality" you think?
Or is it another copy/paste rant?I would like him to explain to us his allegations because it seems that with the hindsight that we have... these data have become obsolete...ABC2019 wrote:Christophe wrote:
Yes agree with it...EXCEPT that a total absence of difference between the distribution of deaths does not really go in the direction of vaccine effectiveness...
why is it not really going that way?
si the vaccine reduces lethality in all age groups by 90%, it doesn't change the age distribution, and most of the deaths averted are among the oldest, simply because that's the majority of the number of deaths. It's not contradictory.
I would like him to clarify his “90%” of efficacy and why they would relate to lethality
But with a tangible explanation of himself (and not a cut-and-paste).
With source? Connections ? What does this mean in detail compared to the “94-95%” vaccine efficacy of Pfizer?
What exactly do these “94-95%?” to say that we would be stupid, you have to prove it
Because if he claims that we are so “bad” we have to summon him to explain himself.
Otherwise it's too easy to pass for a pseudo-expert, and us for perpetual idiots. That's enough: he no longer has a place here.
I won't let go... It's going to heat up if he thinks we're suckers, the sucker!
Otherwise you are useless and queek