Nah, I have absolutely nothing to care about BIO, it's not enough for me.
I just tried to successfully demonstrate that you were doing propaganda (and since you have to lie).
The Swiss source was there only as an example. I have since substantiated with completely different sources, so you are in very bad faith. Especially since this source was only there because it was a screenshot of what the first search results from google give, which doesn't really care what types of sources it is . It gave a global vision without bias, that's what I wanted (contrary to what you claim).
It is therefore NOT a compilation of data that I made personally, but what is a selection of the search engine. Which dismantles your iniquitous and false intention.
So you dispute that
the increase in market share is slower than before”. Which is a REASONABLE approach and difficult to dispute, you don't bring any element to demonstrate anything.
You dispute that the organic is on sale increasing in the hard-discount. This is almost impossible to dispute, since the offer is physically present on the stalls and virtually on the web (which proves that there is strong demand and a large supply with accessible prices of around €2 )
https://www.lidl.fr/la-variete-lidl/not ... oduits-bioYou challenge the sources provided by google without telling us what they would have wrong in detail, you just reject them.
In short, the usual brainwashing of GMO supporters. And I'm not going to spend hours there so I really stop there in the face of a liar. Just in case, I blocked you in view of your caricatural objections, so I no longer see your answers since your positions are not scientific (there you don't make the weight — like with your crashes on the Vit. C — and other evasions) nor honorable while continuing to attribute to you a kind of “monopoly on truth”... You are not authoritative here, it's quite the opposite.