JT TF1 20h of the 28.02: presidential candidate pantonized

[Other]

Hello,
After listening to the candidate's message (panton)
I understand that 5 millions of young people are not registered on the electoral list?
If I rely on the local list of the section that I am, on 44000 voters it returns annually 360 has 380 young people who reach the 18ans and at the moment it dies more than 400, but it arrives of the new besides the figures remains stationary or in slight decrease all old ...
That would correspond to the same ratios as here

Andre

[Christophe]

I finally integrated the video on the site: https://www.econologie.com/rachid-nekkaz ... -3360.html

and here is the new correspondent: https://www.econologie.com/rachid-nekkaz ... -3361.html

[gegyx]

http://tf1.lci.fr/infos/elections-2007/ ... hire-.html

[Christophe]

A good guy this Rachid ... as he is already rich (his goods he sold were worth 1,4M € if I understand correctly) he runs not after money like all the others ... or almost

[Christophe]

It seemed to me that Nekkaz said to have his 500 signatures, so I was surprised not to see him in the final list.

This morning I received this "spam" email to be taken with a grain of salt (but still ...):

SCANDAL AROUND SPONSORSHIP

On Monday 19 March 2007 at 17h30, the Constitutional Council released the list of presidential candidates having obtained more than 500 sponsorships. No independent ecologist candidate could obtain the 500 sponsorships (France Gamerre, Antoine Waechter, Jean Marc Governatori).

2 candidates were very surprised not to have obtained the 500 sponsorships:
- Rachid Nekkaz (700 pledges of sponsorship)
- Jean Marc Governatori, member of the UCE (more than 800 promises of sponsorship)

The Constitutional Council decided to publish neither the number nor the names of the elected representatives who granted their sponsorship to candidates who obtained less than 500 sponsorships (which was not the case in the three previous presidential elections)

Rachid Nekkaz appealed to the Constitutional Council on March 21, claiming that pressure had been exerted on elected officials.
His claim was rejected but it revealed the number of sponsorships that had been validated by the Constitutional Council: 13 only (on 700)

Disturbingly, we can note that Jean Louis Debré was appointed head of the Constitutional Council on February 23, the day after the start of the registration of sponsorships by the Council.

However one of the members of the Constitutional Council revealed to the councilor of Jean Marc Governatori that the Constitutional Council would have registered only 11 sponsorships to his name (on more than 800 promises!).

Three hypotheses have therefore appeared:

• Most elected officials have not kept their promises
• most sponsorships have been invalidated by the Constitutional Council, which is highly unlikely as there is usually only 1% of disabled referrals
• Most of the sponsorships have never reached the Constitutional Council because the letter sent to the Constitutional Council has mysteriously disappeared.

THE CASE CORSES:

Wednesday 21 March 2007 in the morning, the adviser of Jean Marc Governatori raised these hypotheses with the candidate by telephone, and suggested to him to file an appeal, knowing that it was possible to know the number of elected officials who had sent a sponsorship to the Constitutional Council by asking them directly.

A few hours later the secretariat of Jean Marc Governatori received an anonymous call saying: "We are aware of the telephone conversation this morning and we urge you not to start an appeal procedure, if you want to stay alive . Forget the presidential election. This is a reserved area. "

Following this, Jean Marc Governatori decided not to start an appeal procedure to calmly prepare the parliamentary elections with its movement "France in action".

The threats sent to Jean Marc Governatori seem to prove that he had in fact obtained the 500 sponsorships, but that his candidacy bothered a lot of people. This would also explain why he had so little access to the media in recent months, and especially why some TV recordings were cut at the editing. Clearly, the program worn by Jean Marc Governatori is a great inconvenience to the rulers in place and they have done everything they can to make it known to the general public. (New education for youth, therapeutic freedom, accomplished democracy, ...)

Clearly, in this election, only one candidate who had control over the general information (and thus "wiretaps") and secret services (and thus the possibility of intercepting mail destined for the Constitutional Council) made sure to eliminate all the candidates who bothered him (and in particular Nicolas Dupont Aignan, Rachid Nekkaz and Jean Marc Governatori). He also helped some candidates whose attendance at the 1 er tour was arranging him to get the 500 referrals.

But beyond the anger that such an injustice and contempt for democracy can provoke, we have the power to restore justice and democracy, by our vote on 22 APRIL 2007, but also by enlightening citizens on the personality of this country. candidate, by spreading this message to the greatest number.

Decisions we will make in the coming days and weeks depend on the fate of France and the future of our children and our planet. They can be the worst as the best.

For France in Action, Paris, the 25 March 2007

[Targol]

Telephone tapping, embezzlement of official mail, death threats, all for a candidate who would not have exceeded the 1%: it still seems a little big ....

[Christophe]

Well, it's clear ... for Nekkaz ... mystery ... because in the interview of BFMTv he said he had greatly exceeded the 500 already at the time ... Now it's a word of the candidate ( understand this is worth it)

[Christophe]

Oula ...

http://www.1933-2007.net/