... since it is a mining energy, therefore fossil and exhaustible ...
You forget to specify that this does not ensure national energy independence either, unless you consider Niger as an overseas territory ...
... since it is a mining energy, therefore fossil and exhaustible ...
Ahmed wrote:Christophe, you write:... since it is a mining energy, therefore fossil and exhaustible ...
You forget to specify that this does not ensure national energy independence either, unless you consider Niger as an overseas territory ...
Christophe wrote:I did not know that nuclear power was simply part of an option in the plan energetic transition... since it is a mining energy therefore fossil and exhaustible ...
sen-no-sen wrote:To use the answer again, yes, we can make the ecological transition without nuclear power ... the other question is how long and in what type of society?
GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:phil59 wrote:GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:If it's recyclable, who cares?
Usually, to recycle, we consume energy.
Extending the lifespan, "of any device", without relentlessness, however, is undoubtedly better.
It's true, you're right, long live the disposable, but of quality.
Go back to "Fossil energies: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)"
Users browsing this forum : A.D. 44 and 273 guests