Understanding the covid test (serological, pcr, antigenic) of Sars-Cov2 (and its variants)

[Janic]

RAJ

They are not sick / symptomatic (that's what he meant, I guess)

No, this is about the unreliability of tests that detect nucleic acids that can be attributed to covid while belonging to other antigens. This is what calls him into question exactly as with the Elisa tests during the wave of fear at the time of AIDS which tested sometimes positive, sometimes negative. Any test should be controlled by some other method; as a serology, to confirm or deny it. but it is expensive!
https://www.cerballiance.fr/fr/blog/act ... e-covid-19
abcon

you who seem to understand janic a little better than me?

anyway you never understand anything, except your sect> AFIS, there you swallow the pill dry!

[ABC2019]

RAJ

They are not sick / symptomatic (that's what he meant, I guess)

No, this is about the unreliability of tests that detect nucleic acids that can be attributed to covid while belonging to other antigens.

According to you there is what proportion of positive cases which are really contaminated then?

[Janic]

abcon

According to you there is what proportion of positive cases which are really contaminated then?

a number, obviously!

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

According to you there is what proportion of positive cases which are really contaminated then?

According to you there is what proportion of positive cases that are not contaminated (stupid question for stupid question, let's go cheerfully!).

[ABC2019]

According to you there is what proportion of positive cases which are really contaminated then?

According to you there is what proportion of positive cases that are not contaminated (stupid question for stupid question, let's go cheerfully!).

the question is not stupid, it is important ...!

https://www.sciencepresse.qc.ca/actuali ... e-pandemie

According to an assessment by the Ontario Ministry of Health last summer, the false positive rate in its territory is less than 0,01%.

certainly a lot less than untested contaminants anyway.

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

(Bozo "the return": Figures, oh not even, "certainly less" ... long live science in infusion!)

[Obamot]

According to you there is what proportion of positive cases which are really contaminated then?

And how do you think we detect that? And you must know it you who regularly publishes magnificent curves taken from a hat ...

[ABC2019]

(Bozo "the return": Figures, oh not even, "certainly less" ... long live science in infusion!)

it's true that guignoldebois, he gives him plenty of figures

less than 0,01% is a figure, and we are still waiting for those who claim that the epidemic is very overestimated ...

https://www.ft.com/content/a2901ce8-5eb ... df5b386938

[ABC2019]

According to you there is what proportion of positive cases which are really contaminated then?

And how do you think we detect that? And you must know it you who regularly publishes magnificent curves taken from a hat ...

if you don't know, what is the basis for claiming that they are false then?

[Obamot]

It has not changed, still in relation to hospital lethality ... => on a number of real cases for “X” cases certified / 1'000 inhabitants.

Which does not prevent you from answering us!