Bonjour Christophe
Hello André
Bonjour à tous
Why André ... it's simple
From what I have read here and there ... a lot there, on econology ... an increasingly obvious term ... econology ... it's you Christophe
if yes Hat ... otherwise hat !!!!
Sorry ... I'm getting lost
André, it seems to me that you like big nags, I came across it by chance!
In 1993 in search of a renault space I found only wrecks at crazy prices and there a V6 ... KRA IS LER in addition ... soon a Museum piece if Daimler fout nettles ... BRIEF ...
A Chrysler V6 3 liter petrol injection ... automatic gearbox
Nothing to fall on your knees ... Wait, let me get up
Currently 150 Kms ... Squeaks a bit in the corners, but little more than me.
Question to andré
I'm coming
This morning, in a good mood, even if it is raining, I equip myself with a 5 liter can of water, a 2 ml hose of about 3 to 4 mm in diameter and transparent.
I open the hood ... YES
And I connect the pipe to the intake manifold of the V6, to the "assisted" braking depression socket
With the engine running, I immerse the hose in the water container ...
And there in less than 30 s, the V6 sucks a good glass of water without flinching.
I did not dare to operate the throttle valve, for fear of possible damage ...
The engine has absolutely not flinched, apart from the white steam coming out of the pot ...
And this is André where I need your experience ...
According to you what are the risks of massively sending water into an engine
Is there a problem for the catalytic converter
Subsidiary question ... if you don't mind
Why a fuel-poor mixture can be dangerous for an engine ... Hep, we don't laugh.
In any case, Thank you for your attention
Good night
This morning, in a good mood, even if it is raining, I equip myself with a 5 liter can of water, a 2 ml hose of about 3 to 4 mm in diameter and transparent.
I open the hood ... YES
And I connect the pipe to the intake manifold of the V6, to the "assisted" braking depression socket
With the engine running, I immerse the hose in the water container ...
And there in less than 30 s, the V6 sucks a good glass of water without flinching.
I did not dare to operate the throttle valve, for fear of possible damage ...
The engine has absolutely not flinched, apart from the white steam coming out of the pot ...
And this is André where I need your experience ...
According to you what are the risks of massively sending water into an engine
Is there a problem for the catalytic converter
Subsidiary question ... if you don't mind
Why a fuel-poor mixture can be dangerous for an engine ... Hep, we don't laugh.
In any case, Thank you for your attention
Good night
0 x
Hello,
You should know that the GM V6, Chrysler, the vacuum hose communicates only with a group of 3 cylinders
that at idle the depression is enormous, that the engine is able to swallow a lot of water the limit is misfires.
water sent like this directly into the engine does nothing but cleaning it does not improve consumption.
The entry door into V6 is the hole in the ERG valve which is right next to it.
It is not recommended to wash the engine with liquid water
when the speed will increase it will draw less water, the depression decreases, but these engines like mine 3,8 liters
it rolls at 100kmh at 1800 rpm and the depression is at half atmospheric pressure. (0,5 bar)
In the 60s, what some people did with infusion sets, he allowed the engine to drip water away.
by a vacuum pipe which of course communicates in the 6 cylinders, but it is difficult to adjust it takes very little water.
it would be better to spray it before entering the engine.
For the big engines it is not that I like that it is because I do not have any other on hand .. (It would be necessary that I rejuvenate my vehicles and for the experiments I think that the old ones are pretend better)
Andre
You should know that the GM V6, Chrysler, the vacuum hose communicates only with a group of 3 cylinders
that at idle the depression is enormous, that the engine is able to swallow a lot of water the limit is misfires.
water sent like this directly into the engine does nothing but cleaning it does not improve consumption.
The entry door into V6 is the hole in the ERG valve which is right next to it.
It is not recommended to wash the engine with liquid water
when the speed will increase it will draw less water, the depression decreases, but these engines like mine 3,8 liters
it rolls at 100kmh at 1800 rpm and the depression is at half atmospheric pressure. (0,5 bar)
In the 60s, what some people did with infusion sets, he allowed the engine to drip water away.
by a vacuum pipe which of course communicates in the 6 cylinders, but it is difficult to adjust it takes very little water.
it would be better to spray it before entering the engine.
For the big engines it is not that I like that it is because I do not have any other on hand .. (It would be necessary that I rejuvenate my vehicles and for the experiments I think that the old ones are pretend better)
Andre
0 x
-
- Similar topics
- Replies
- views
- Last message
-
- 17 Replies
- 8992 views
-
Last message by Aumicron
View the latest post
14/04/10, 09:56A subject posted in the forum : special motors, patents, fuel consumption reduction
-
- 5 Replies
- 5255 views
-
Last message by Macro
View the latest post
18/01/10, 08:33A subject posted in the forum : special motors, patents, fuel consumption reduction
-
- 3 Replies
- 2525 views
-
Last message by Christophe
View the latest post
18/08/08, 10:13A subject posted in the forum : special motors, patents, fuel consumption reduction
-
- 1 Replies
- 4134 views
-
Last message by zac
View the latest post
20/10/05, 17:47A subject posted in the forum : special motors, patents, fuel consumption reduction
Back to "Special motors, patents, fuel consumption reduction"
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 226 guests