Nuclear VS fossil fuels VS Solar .... Who wins?

[Exnihiloest]

You're better at thermodynamics than witches moving on their brooms, much better!

Remundo, since you complain about the discussions that drag on bickering, it is perhaps on this kind of post that we should intervene, right?

+1

and there is much worse, example, or another example ou yet another example ah, hey, still the same, the darling of the "moderators"?

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

(Small insults worse than the wishes of you or even die, the old debris is priceless ...)

[Obamot]

All because its infused science has been dented by my post Agriculture / and-so-on-bio-was-a-lure-euuuuuh-t15738-830.html # p444490 who knocked her out of her splendor well obliged to admit that he was not saying exact things (while sticking to his positions) I was not on bad terms with him, but this sneaky little revenge is an infection and says lng about the guy (so that I was rather nice). I could well change my mind ...

PS: and the post he quotes dates from Methuselah

[Exnihiloest]

What weathervanes! The "Grünen" Veronilka Wendland and Rainer Moormann, who campaigned against nuclear power in the 1990s, are now campaigning for! They only took 25 years to understand the situation, the dead end to which they were leading us, and the need for nuclear power. In the political world of the Greens, if you come across anything other than puppets, let me know, I'll be curious to find out.
http://www.economiematin.fr/news-ecolog ... -redacteur

[Obamot]

For Blédina 1 + 1 = ALL

Hidden content

You must be registered and logged in on this forum to see the hidden content.

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

The reason ? Renewable energies are not, according to them, still sufficiently developed, at the present time - in particular to meet the increase in demand during the winter period.

http://www.economiematin.fr/news-ecolog ... -redacteur

[Exnihiloest]

For Blédina 1 + 1 = ALL

If Onabot had read the article, it would have allowed him to respond intelligently.
When only "1 + 1" are able to "create discord" in their own camp, it means that they are not the only ones and that even the most idiots are wondering!

[Exnihiloest]

The reason ? Renewable energies are not, according to them, still sufficiently developed, at the present time - in particular to meet the increase in demand during the winter period.

They are not going to say that they are all wrong, obviously, we have to be delusional. Renewable energies are intermittent energies, they will never be able to meet demand since their limits do not depend on their development, but on the weather. And they will be obsolete when the merger takes over.

In short, renewable energies are not complementary energies but superfluous energies, since it is necessary to be able to ensure full production even when they do not provide anything.

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

The reason ? Renewable energies are not, according to them, still sufficiently developed, at the present time - in particular to meet the increase in demand during the winter period.

http://www.economiematin.fr/news-ecolog ... -redacteur

[Exnihiloest]

The reason ? Renewable energies are not, according to them, still sufficiently developed, at the present time - in particular to meet the increase in demand during the winter period.

All wrong, for the good reason that:

their limits do not depend on their development, but on the weather

Probably the Greens think that in the absence of winds, a million wind turbines produce more than ten thousand.
The "science" of the Greens is the science of zeros: a million times zero is greater than ten thousand times zero.