Advances in the fight against the coronavirus

How to stay healthy and prevent risks and consequences on your health and public health. occupational disease, industrial risks (asbestos, air pollution, electromagnetic waves ...), company risk (workplace stress, overuse of drugs ...) and individual (tobacco, alcohol ...).
VetusLignum
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1690
Registration: 27/11/18, 23:38
x 760

Re: Advances in the fight against the coronavirus




by VetusLignum » 21/04/21, 01:22

VetusLignum wrote:An article on macrolides, and in particular azithromycin.
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10 ... 42313/full


And also an article on fluvoxamine:
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10 ... 52688/full

And another on ivermectin:
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10 ... 63586/full
1 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79360
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11060

Re: Advances in the fight against the coronavirus




by Christophe » 21/04/21, 02:40

Obamot wrote:"Anti-depress" oneself, without chemical molecules (going for a walk, having confidence and joie de vivre, getting out of stress, sleeping well and eating well, etc.)
it also works great!


It is not the subject but you forgot the fundamental of a depression: the environment and human support!

Some say that before diagnosing depression you need to check not to be surrounded by assholes ! And they are right...

How has humanity done for 50 years without anti-depressants? : Cheesy: : Cheesy: : Cheesy:

Read pollution-prevention-health / psychology-screening-for-depression-by-blood-test-t16825.html
0 x
User avatar
Macro
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6524
Registration: 04/12/08, 14:34
x 1641

Re: Advances in the fight against the coronavirus




by Macro » 21/04/21, 06:55

Christophe wrote:
Some say that before diagnosing depression you need to check not to be surrounded by assholes ! And they are right...

How has humanity done for 50 years without anti-depressants? : Cheesy: : Cheesy: : Cheesy:



By limiting his contact with others : Cheesy: : Cheesy: : Cheesy: Barrier gestures protect against many pathologies
0 x
The only thing safe in the future. It is that there may chance that it conforms to our expectations ...
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79360
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11060

Re: Advances in the fight against the coronavirus




by Christophe » 21/04/21, 10:32

It depends ... because in the case of depression: isolation and loneliness are aggravating causes!

I believe I heard that 30% of adults in France were taking "psychological" treatment since the covid crisis (+ or - heavy) ... so that the crisis had exploded the figures! : Arrow: health-pollution-prevention / covid-psychological-debates-aids-and-supports-t16624.html

France was already the world champion in per capita consumption ... before the covid, I believe that 5% of French people were permanently in depression (that's because of the assholes around them!) ... to check !
0 x
User avatar
Macro
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6524
Registration: 04/12/08, 14:34
x 1641

Re: Advances in the fight against the coronavirus




by Macro » 21/04/21, 10:43

Out of 10 people you meet in the street ... 3 would need psycho care and do not have it ... So not surprisingly the figure of 30% of the population who consume ad ...
0 x
The only thing safe in the future. It is that there may chance that it conforms to our expectations ...
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Advances in the fight against the coronavirus




by Obamot » 21/04/21, 12:37

Christophe wrote:
Obamot wrote:"Anti-depress" oneself, without chemical molecules (going for a walk, having confidence and joie de vivre, getting out of stress, sleeping well and eating well, etc.)
it also works great!


1 This is not the subject, but you forgot the fundamentals of depression: the environment and human support!

2 Some say that before diagnosing depression you need to check not to be surrounded by assholes ! And they are right...

3 How has humanity done for 50 years without anti-depressants? : Cheesy: : Cheesy: : Cheesy:

Read pollution-prevention-health / psychology-screening-for-depression-by-blood-test-t16825.html

1) It was not me who started it, but YES it is partly the subject since the precariousness and the promiscuity are a favorable ground for the ecosystem of the virus. It has become a responsibility to solve the problem of poverty.

2) It's always possible. When you live in an apartment. you depend on this apartment.
So if there are con (flits) in the apartment. each pays a certain price for it.

3) Indeed, it is the societal problem which relates to the human being and which is partly due to the fact that to live in society, one must accept / manage certain constraints, and that, moreover, the fact of having bathed in constraints from even before birth (in the mother's womb, since the fetus is completely dependent on the mother's state of mental and physical health) means that we NEED coercion (the “need for coercion” of A. Masslow, cited in the courts, but who does not appear in his pyramid of needs). Moreover, certain constraints save our lives.

So "humanity" it has come to terms with it, it has adapted, besides Darwin's theory of evolution, is it not based on the principle: constraint => adaptation.

For the covid, those responsible (up to the highest level of the state) who have not seen that to immerse themselves every day in the universe anxiety inducing mainstream contamination and poisoning curves of “Perpetual rehashing of the message”, had jumped mortality by 6x via the explosion of other pathologies, should become more aware that it is necessary to slow down the field of verbal contamination of have-you-saw me assholes and not the other way around. This is what the managers of the (as) social networks - which are used by the so-called “assholes”, have not understood. like a weapon, to harm their neighbor - and those who saw the windfall, have therefore instrumentalised certain “assholes” for political and even economic or even criminal ends. It appears in several niches, whenever there is a way to leave comments on the web.

The “assholes” are like metastases, like a virus, in the absence of early treatment of the causes, we pay the price then.

When it's not possible to do otherwise than “manage” them, yes, ... let's run away from the idiots : Mrgreen:
0 x
sicetaitsimple
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9836
Registration: 31/10/16, 18:51
Location: Lower Normandy
x 2673

Re: Advances in the fight against the coronavirus




by sicetaitsimple » 21/04/21, 13:00

Obamot wrote:For the covid, those responsible (up to the highest level of the state) who have not seen that to immerse themselves every day in the universe anxiety inducing mainstream contamination and poisoning curves of “Perpetual rehashing of the message”, had jumped mortality by 6x through the explosion of other pathologies,


Oh well, has mortality jumped six times? Where, when, what pathologies, and especially sources?
0 x
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13716
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1525
Contact :

Re: Advances in the fight against the coronavirus




by izentrop » 21/04/21, 15:37

Droplet or aerosol?
Advances in knowledge of virus transmission in the air according to Lancet study (machine translation)
Decades of painstaking research, which did not include the capture of living pathogens in the air, has shown that diseases once thought to be spread by droplets are airborne.4 Ten data sources collectively support the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 is transmitted mainly by air transport. 5 (by aerosol)
10 point explanation
- First, the over-threading events explain a significant transmission of SARS-CoV-2; indeed, such events may be the main drivers of the pandemic.6 Detailed analyzes of human behaviors and interactions, room sizes, ventilation and other variables in choral concerts, cruise ships , slaughterhouses, nursing homes, and correctional facilities, among others, have shown patterns, for example, long-range transmission and overdispersion of the basic reproduction number (R0), discussed below, consistent with the airborne spread of SARS-CoV-2 which cannot be adequately explained by droplets or fomites.6 The high incidence of such events strongly suggests the dominance of aerosol transmission.

- Second, long-range transmission of SARS-CoV-2 between people living in adjacent rooms, but never in the presence of each other has been documented in quarantine hotels.7 Historically, it was not possible to prove long-range transmission than in the total absence of community transmission.4

- Third, asymptomatic or presymptomatic transmission of SARS-CoV-2 by people who do not cough or sneeze is likely to account for at least one-third, and possibly up to 59%, of all transmission to the virus. global scale and is a key means of spread of SARS-CoV-2 worldwide, 8 from a predominantly airborne mode of transmission. Direct measurements show that talking produces thousands of aerosol particles and few large droplets, 9 which takes over the air route.

- Fourth, the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is higher indoors than outdoors10 and is considerably reduced by indoor ventilation.5 Both observations support a predominantly airborne route of transmission.

- Fifth, nosocomial infections have been documented in healthcare organizations, where there have been strict contact and droplet precautions and the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) designed to protect against exposure to droplets, but not aerosols.11

- Sixth, viable SARS-CoV-2 has been detected in the air. In laboratory experiments, SARS-CoV-2 remained infectious in air for up to 3 h with a half-life of 1 h. 1 Viable SARS-CoV-12 has been identified in air samples from rooms occupied by covid-2 patients in the absence of aerosol-generating healthcare procedures19 and from air samples from the car of an infected person.13 Although others Studies have failed to capture viable SARS-CoV-14 in air samples, as is to be expected. Sampling for airborne virus is technically difficult for several reasons, including the limited effectiveness of some sampling methods for the collection of fine particles, viral dehydration during collection, viral damage due to forces. impact (resulting in loss of viability), the re-aerosolization of the virus during viral collection and retention in the sampling equipment.2 Measles and tuberculosis, two predominantly airborne diseases, have never been cultivated in the air of the room.3

- Seventh, SARS-CoV-2 has been identified in air filters and construction ducts in hospitals with patients with COVID-19; these locations could only be reached by aerosols.16

- Eighth, studies of infected caged animals that were linked to uninfected caged animals through an air duct have shown the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 which cannot be adequately explained. than by aerosols. 17

- Ninth, no study to our knowledge has provided strong or consistent evidence to refute the hypothesis of airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Some people have avoided infection with SARS-CoV-2 when sharing air with infected people, but this could be due to a combination of factors, including variation in the amount of viral shedding between infectious people by orders of magnitude and different environmental conditions (particularly ventilation) .18 Individual and environmental variations mean that a minority of primary cases (especially individuals who exert high levels of the virus to the indoor, overcrowded environments with poor ventilation) account for the majority of secondary infections, which is supported by high-quality contact tracing data from several countries.19, 20 Large variation in respiratory viral load of SARS- CoV-2 countered arguments that SARS-CoV-2 cannot be airborne because the virus has a lower R0 ( estimated at around 2 · 5) 21 measles (estimated at around 15), 22 especially since R0, which is an average, does not take into account the fact that only a minority of infectious individuals lose large amounts of the virus. Overdispersion of R0 is well documented in COVID-19.23

- Tenth, there is little evidence to support other dominant routes of transmission, i.e., respiratory droplet or fomitis.9, 24 Ease of infection between people in close proximity to each other. others has been cited as evidence of respiratory transmission of SARS-CoV-2 droplets. However, near transmission in most cases as well as distant infection for a few when sharing air is more likely to be explained by the dilution of exhaled aerosols with distance from an infected person. 9 The mistaken assumption that proximity transmission involves large respiratory droplets or fomites has always been used for decades to deny airborne transmission of tuberculosis and measles.15, 25 This has become medical dogma, ignoring the direct measurements of aerosols and droplets that reveal defects such as the overwhelming number of aerosols produced in respiratory activities and the arbitrary particle size limit of 5 μm between aerosols and droplets, instead of the correct limit of 100 μm. 15, 25 It is sometimes argued that since respiratory droplets are larger than aerosols, they must contain more virus. However, in diseases where pathogen concentrations were quantified by particle size, smaller aerosols had higher pathogen concentrations than droplets when both were measured.15

In conclusion, we propose that it is a scientific error to use the absence of direct evidence of SARS-CoV-2 in some air samples to cast doubt on airborne transmission while neglecting the quality. and the strength of the overall evidence base. There is strong and consistent evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is spread by air transmission. While other routes can help, we believe the air route is likely to be dominant. The public health community should act accordingly and without further delay. the study
0 x
ABC2019
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12927
Registration: 29/12/19, 11:58
x 1008

Re: Advances in the fight against the coronavirus




by ABC2019 » 21/04/21, 17:31

sicetaitsimple wrote:
Obamot wrote:For the covid, those responsible (up to the highest level of the state) who have not seen that to immerse themselves every day in the universe anxiety inducing mainstream contamination and poisoning curves of “Perpetual rehashing of the message”, had jumped mortality by 6x through the explosion of other pathologies,


Oh well, has mortality jumped six times? Where, when, what pathologies, and especially sources?

weird, we don't see anything on euromomo apart from the covid peaks ...
0 x
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)

Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)
User avatar
Adrien (ex-nico239)
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9845
Registration: 31/05/17, 15:43
Location: 04
x 2150

Re: Advances in the fight against the coronavirus




by Adrien (ex-nico239) » 21/04/21, 19:31

UK government official website launches Antiviral Task Force to find early treatments for covid before fall

The principle of early treatment is therefore no longer dismissed with a dismissive backhand ... times are changing and mentalities are evolving.
Too bad it was a year late, but hey had to sell the vaccine first

original version
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/gove ... his-autumn

the translation
https://translate.google.com/translate? ... &sandbox=1
1 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 347 guests