The post-Coronavirus world

[Obamot]

PS: morality, all this gives the feeling that viruses that are too nasty are plagues for pharmacies in the current state of knowledge (since they are at the crossroads of immune issues, and as Janic would say “we can't find anything until we look in the right place...), and the interview only shows the bottom, how it is financed hard, some premises that show how it can bring in a crazy dough. In this regard, it is astounding to see how the lines of research work, what motivates them and with what amateurism all this is governed by the mechanism of competitiveness applied to the resolution of our physiological problems and while we believe trusting “science” (represented by the labs) as the supreme discipline in which we should have blind trust. While the human being in all his transcendence is absent from this debate of “scientism” which is coldly like a forensic scientist, and above all does not tackle the real basic problem of PUBLIC HEALTH of poisoning populations at large. scale (and slowly) - with the covid they were very pissed off last year (admitting the fortuitous aspect of the syndemia, which is far from being clear as we see above), because they do not 'had nothing on hand right away (and we had to kill off-labels who don't bring in enough money) - anyway, their thing doesn't solve anything since it doesn't correct the causes ( which is precisely the goal to have patients "captive of treatment", because this type of virus kills co-morbidities too quickly, which then do not bring in enough money). We will see the plan, but there people are tired, it slackens, they begin to understand the scam.

[Janic]

obamot +10
the sick are like the hunters of strangers. There are the good patients, those who are and will remain so as long as possible and even until their death (the runaways) and there are the bad patients, those who die too quickly or worse who recover to destroy the business. It's shameful, we should make them stay sick, but how? .... Ah yes, vaccines! With that we are guaranteed to have customers for life for the petroleum brothers who rap everything! Petroleum in the food , petroleum in the fields, petroleum in medocs, petroleum in vaccines, petroleum in water, air and even heat engines, petroleum everywhere!

[Obamot]

Hence the new saying:

- “Petroleum overdose will lead you to linoleum“ _

[ABC2019]

Wuhan's corona has disappeared. We have mutants.

The current massive vaccinations create numerous variants and numerous asymptomatic ones. And so on.

The observation will become obvious from countries with syringes: Israel, USA, England ...

In the lottery, the bad picks will fall with more severe variants.

Do not dramatize, the severity of the variants will not increase ad infinitum: at best, we will manage to adapt the vaccines each year like the flu. At worst, it will stop when all the fragile people developing a fatal reaction to the virus have died, and the others will gradually become immune, with a usual batch of deaths each year, but bearable by society - like all coronaviruses already having exist.
With 0,1 to 0,2% mortality, it is not an apocalypse. It is just enough to saturate our health systems, but if we had not had these health systems, we would have had nothing to saturate and it would have been a very bad flu among others (and having had less of old people we would have had fewer deaths). This epidemic remains a problem for a rich country.

[Obamot]

People can't take it anymore ...

And ... next year the elections, it will be the “big reset” for Micron

"Things will never be the same again, no matter what. It is highly unlikely that our democracies will emerge from this techno-security plunge unscathed."

Before what? we just found out how things just “are” NOW. So as before is now, let's do like the Africans for whom tomorrow does not exist ...

If the tussle continues (there we have exceeded 20 million deaths with the resulting deaths ...) there will be a purge one day or the next ...

It can only get better. ( )

[Janic]

Do not dramatize, the severity of the variants will not increase ad infinitum: at best, we will manage to adapt the vaccines each year like the flu. At worst, it will stop when all the fragile people developing a fatal reaction to the virus have died, and the others will gradually become immune, with a usual batch of deaths each year, but bearable by society - like all coronaviruses already having exist.

and here is what ABC believes to be doing the second degree whereas it is precisely the first which sums up the situation well.

With 0,1 to 0,2% mortality, it is not an apocalypse. It is just enough to saturate our health systems, but if we had not had these health systems, we would have had nothing to saturate and it would have been a very bad flu among others (and having had less of old people we would have had fewer deaths). This epidemic remains a problem of a rich country.

human immortality does not exist and when it is the time, it is the time to change plans. However, the rich and the poor alike in poor health or co-morbidities are equal in the face of death and the fear of dying does not improve the living situation, quite the contrary, and all these anxiety-provoking speeches for more than a year have had something to do with it. thing by their indisputable nocebo effect. Indeed if there were not so many comorbidities, the hospitals would not be saturated.

[Christophe]

The violence is progressing ... it is not only because of the Covid but it will not help matters !!!

Alain Bauer: "There is no feeling of insecurity, there is a climate of insecurity"

"Over twenty years, we have gone from a little less than 3 incidents per year to almost 000"

The criminologist returns to the statistics of violence and draws attention to the rise of "homicidity", which in 2020 reaches its highest level since 1972

https://www.lexpress.fr/actualite/socie ... 51109.html



There are no reliable or stable tools for calculating crime and delinquency. It does not exist. There are only partial, fragmented and partial tools. They only take into account part of the crime, the part known or declared. They are used for political reasons, not as a tool for understanding crime, but for analyzing the effectiveness of the public response to crime. To have a reliable tool, you need a device that includes both the declarative tool, what people declare, the observation tool, what the police seek and find, and the victimization tool, what the people say they have suffered even when they have not reported it. What we know the least, for example, is physical and sexual violence in the home. There are 9% of complaints compared to the whole of declared victimization. We complain much more of theft of a rear-view mirror than of repeated physical violence at home. When you have these three tools, you are getting closer to reality. When we do not have them, we are left with homicide, the only stable tool for analyzing the ultimate violence in a society. In five centuries, we have gone from 150 homicides per 100 inhabitants to less than 000. A reduction by 2.

[Christophe]

Explosion in the price of lumber in the USA ...

prix_bois_construction.jpg (158.66 KiB) Viewed 1006 times

[Christophe]

Very well !!!

These French people who no longer want to work ...
They experienced June 9, the date of returning to the office, as a constraint, even a punishment. Does the demotivation of many employees, away from work for months, threaten the French recovery? Investigation

199271589_10157970296635703_3523519462324069788_n.jpg (456.61 KB) Viewed times 888

https://journal.lepoint.fr/sommaire-2548

[Christophe]

No kidding...

... as well as nuclear bombers ...