sen-no-sen wrote:Child pornography photos on the computers of Chérif Kouachi and Coulibaly
In fact, in the first instance, the first time that the news was disseminated, the news that the images were decoys to hide something there, was not mentioned (either by journalists' ignorance, voluntarily or not)
sen-no-sen wrote:Several hypotheses, in order of relevance
1)the two terrorists stashed data via pedophile images in a "smokescreen", therefore unrelated to any activity of this kind ... bizarre however because this kind of site is monitored.
That was what was given as a clue then (I heard it on the TV.)
sen-no-sen wrote: 2) this case came out again to permanently soil terrorists, a manipulation strategy very often used, in order to symbolize the enemy in the form of an absolute evil
a) it is indeed a common practice, in particular by the C! A.
b) these attackers have already dirty themselves (such crimes are not "clean") even if the proportion is not comparable to the immeasurable crimes committed by the West (already 2 million dead in Iraq according to some sources and creation of a "pseudo-state" in the vacuum left, was there not a more "political" solution, without counting the irreparable psychological damage within the population. The worst being probably the destruction of the historic sites to cut populations off from their roots?);
c) and of course, we come back to it every time, the deficiency of a Palestinian rule of law, which constitutes an alibi for all kinds of challenging grounds and in particular of the movements that we know and whose effects we see;
sen-no-sen wrote:3)His images were intentionally placed at the end of making them "sing".
Hiding info in any type of image is indeed a technique for going unnoticed. So there ... I still have some reservations about the interest there would be in disseminating this type of information (may be intended for parents who have kids who ... and that parental control would discover this stuff ...)
sen-no-sen wrote:4)The facts are true, which would confirm the principle that "the greatest moralizers are the greatest perverts"
A little bit of all these points, right?
This is one of the reasons why we must be careful not to take a position on the issue of alleged terrorism (which does not mean not taking action). If the horrors are true (proof of a great distress), the manipulations (conscious one not that they are voluntary or not, etc) are only vast attempts to rally the opinion (that all that is guided or not ).
And this, whoever is there last and whatever the motives. This is why there is no need to react, nor to take to the street (I nevertheless liked the "Je suis Charlie" walk) simply because we do not know who is behind.
I have not stopped seeing attempts to recover and instrumentalize this, whatever its ends (but the most disgust was by the politicians: because they are aware of many things and they keep quiet ...)
Finally, the most notorious was the voluntary absence of an invitation to Netanyaou (who invited himself) and the absence of Obama. It means what it means ...
But then the big "we all love each other" then recovered as best as possible
Ditto for autism on "big subjects" (and especially by some governments).
Mébon, it is not so much that it is cultural in the broad sense (and not at all "cult"), it is our theoretical model which wants that and for the blow, one only has the world which one has " deserved"...
