"We must, say Dominique Bourg and Kerry Whiteside," not replace but complete representative democracy by institutions where experts and NGOs play the leading role, not elected officials".
[...]
This is what the sociologist Jean-Pierre Le Goff sums up by the expression "ecofascism". "
The NGOs are not representative of the people, those who enter it is because they are already in agreement with the ideology defended by these NGOs. And they would become judges and parties in decisions that engage society ?! In addition supported by "experts" therefore technocrats who should be given carte blanche on the pretext that the people would not understand anything about technical issues or would refuse options that these NGOs and these "experts" would consider essential ?!
Wanting to have the future of society decided by "experts" and "NGOs", instead of citizens and their elected representatives, is obviously fascism, it is ecofascism in the sense of Jean-Pierre Le Goff. And this ecofascism is hypocritical, presenting this development dispossessing the citizen of the little power he already had, as going "Towards an ecological democracy", title of the work of the two ecologists in question, which however has nothing more to do with it. to do with democracy.
The simple fact of adding a label to "democracy" is to limit it, to limit it to the sole whim of those who label it. Ecology cannot be claimed to be the only framework or the dominant framework for the organization of society, human life is not reduced to it.
This call for ecofascism is a leitmotif coming from environmentalists themselves. Their recurring message is that, since there would be a threat to humanity - heating, pollution or others - that the threat would be unstoppable if we do not follow their recommendations, and that elected officials are unable to enforce them. , or refuse them, then it would be necessary to impose them by a "strong" power.
GuyGadebois and his outrageous remarks against people who speak out or his calumnies of organizations like the UNSCEAR of the UN, without any evidence, exactly crystallizes this ecofascism: they are only abject Stalinist trials.
the contempt he has for humans and living things in general. You no longer exist, Tryphon.
Here is the typical reaction of the Green Khmer: to put in the gulag, even to eliminate completely, with a blow of lawsuit of intention, of subjective and crappy interpretations, of slander and denial of humanity among those who do not think like him.
It is because the Khmer Vert claims to have the monopoly of humanity, the monopoly of the knowledge of the good for all, and the monopoly of the truth.
So those who do not agree with the Khmer Vert is that they would be angry with humanity, and not that they would prefer for it a whole other path that they would consider much better.
This is exactly why we talk about ecofascism. CQFD.
Thank you for having fallen so low, GuyGadebois, it is very illuminating the drift of ecologism towards a neo-Stalinism, but it will not have been necessary to push you much.