Take the context where he expresses an act of faith and where he affirms that he cannot certify NeitherHowever, it is clear.The only criticism, indeed, is that it expresses an act of religious faith when it is not the place to do so.Sorry Janic, I don't spend my time with hopeless cases ... he claims his arm can grow back? Ok ... Next! Maybe in a few decades yes ... but not today ...
Too bad, once again, that you let yourself be caught in the trap of the same kind of speech (and by the same for that matter) as on the principle of vaccination which also comes from the same act of faith in a miraculous means that would save the individuals of a possible disease without doing anything other than to be injected with a kind of extraordinary product like a host or a baptism of "holy" water, all acts of faith too.
and I do not believe in the hosts, nor in holy waters for that matter, which have undergone the same distortions of meaning as what is reproached to this C.