[...]On the one hand, it is not scientifically established that human activities are solely responsible for climate change. [...]
Even if this is partly true (we do not know enough about the climate and its variations to establish a formal relationship of type a + b = c), it looks far too much, for my taste, as a way to clear the automobile to be able to defend it, because it seems to me that it is, ultimately, the main purpose of this duck ...
In my opinion, the editor could have got out of it in a less ugly way by simply recalling that the automobile was not (and by far) the only contributor to this change, and that it could evolve to participate even less ...
But no ! There he chooses to start the editorial of his N ° 1 by sowing doubt among his readers ... It does not encourage me to continue reading, but I would do it anyway to have a reasoned opinion on this magazine.